So about ESG.

prize pool about as much as was spent on the ac.

taeyeoNNNNNN wrote: »

Hopefully ESG is a p2p league, that way people will take it more seriously and the $$ will look appealing.

and less cheaters .

Sounds like a good idea wouldn't mind paying a few bucks for a great ac and a good league.

DatMuffin wrote: »

How much do you guys think the prize pool is?

I'm guessing millions and millions of dimes.

still 100,000........

the competitive scene will be officially dead if esg becomes a paid league. there is a reason why wogl took that off

loneB wrote: »

That isn't the reason, and that 1 event helped sponsor 3-4 other events.

don't remember the reason but the amount of people who wanted it to remain a p2p league was miniscule to the amount of people who would have played if it were f2p

moch_D wrote: »

The way I see it, having to pay for something discourages cheaters.
$10/player minimum 5 players = $50. Who'd pay $50 to cheat? (other than instinct)

or would winning a huge amount of money for a low fee help incentive a cheater to play?

moch_D wrote: »

The way I see it, having to pay for something discourages cheaters.
$10/player minimum 5 players = $50. Who'd pay $50 to cheat? (other than instinct)

People pay more than that for VIPs why would they NOT try to pay to win money. ? A loss of 10$ is nothing for someone who has money to spend on VIPs. Low cash entrance fees encourage cheaters because they can win something out of it with minimal loss.

when you put it that way, true

p2p .