Anybody want an M4A1-S Patriot review?
Comments
-
Yeah right but he earns money from it too, at the end, the purpose is still personal benefit. Good job in using good excuses
Sorry but that story doesn't work on me because I've put in hundreds of hours into reviews and guides before I started making money (which was a couple days ago).
Get owned, son.
edit*Don't want it, I know ur a genius at doing the preview but some of them are not quite right and u never admit ur mistake so for me NO
Actually I do admit when I'm wrong, but it doesn't happen often because 99% of the time I'm basing what I say off of facts that I've found out, and facts are never wrong.
The 1% of the time I didn't base what I was saying on facts and just what I thought to be true, was the few times that I was wrong and admitted it. -
Already subbed.. I like your videos. But asking for subs on the forum will get you lots of haters saying that all you care about is subscribers more than actually helping the community. Would prefer you telling your friends to tell their friends to subscribe..
Meh I figured I'd just do this once to get a kick-start and the Patriot seemed to be a much wanted review so I figured this would be the best time to do it.
Sorry double post, got ninja'd
edit*
To add on to this, what I said in a different thread about not wanting a bunch of people to subscribe that don't care about my videos is still true, which is why I'm saying I'll review a certain weapon instead of giving out zp or something.
CrossFireDatabase has over 2000 subscribers, and my videos have gotten tens of thousands of views. I believe I have a lot more than 300 people that like my reviews but haven't subscribed, so I'm just trying to give that extra little nudge. -
-
Hm..alright.
- 20 second reload rate (same as the m4 spring)
- 100% wallbang
- Same damage as other m4.
- 1 hit head.
Need anything else, dear mod?
Us3r's point was you were implying it's bad to review overpowered guns, which was a stupid thing to say (on your part). -
phailureone wrote: »LMAO 20 Second Reload :O
2.0 Sec reload + Faster ROF and different scope
LOL. My bad typo
Edit:GodsGunman wrote: »Us3r's point was you were implying it's bad to review overpowered guns, which was a stupid thing to say (on your part).
There's really nothing to review. -
LOL. My bad typo

Edit:
There's really nothing to review.
That's for the community to decide, not me. Lots of people have been asking for for a patriot review, and I believe I would know more about what the community wants than you considering lots of them tell me. -
Does a television station ask what you want to watch before putting it on?
No.
You put it out, advertise and see who watches.
Obviously the people here that WANT to watch it will watch it once its done and out.
I find it cheap to essentially beg for subs otherwise they wont put the video out. -
Giggletron wrote: »Does a television station ask what you want to watch before putting it on?
No.
You put it out, advertise and see who watches.
Obviously the people here that WANT to watch it will watch it once its done and out.
I find it cheap to essentially beg for subs otherwise they wont put the video out.
I'm confident I'll easily get 300 subs.
And BTW I'm still making it in the mean-time while people subscribe and I will still upload it, but I might be encouraged to spend even more of my time one it and get it out faster if I get 300 subscribers. -
Im sure you will make 300 subs.
But this is cheap and lazy, to be honest.. you should really be ashamed of pulling this
You should be getting subs (and money... since that your account is/will be monetized) based on your current content... not content you may be putting out. -
Giggletron wrote: »Im sure you will make 300 subs.
But this is cheap and lazy, to be honest.. you should really be ashamed of pulling this
You should be getting subs (and money... since that your account is/will be monetized) based on your current content... not content you may be putting out.
Personally I don't see anything morally or ethically wrong with this. If people like my videos and want more, they should subscribe. If they don't really care, they shouldn't.
If I liked what someone was doing but I was hesitant to subscribe, a little extra incentive might be all I'd need to subscribe.
As I said before I don't want people that don't care about what I'm doing to subscribe, that's why I don't do the sub4sub thing. I just want to give people that like my videos incentive to sub. -
GodsGunman wrote: »Personally I don't see anything morally or ethically wrong with this. If people like my videos and want more, they should subscribe. If they don't really care, they shouldn't.
If I liked what someone was doing but I was hesitant to subscribe, a little extra incentive might be all I'd need to subscribe.
As I said before I don't want people that don't care about what I'm doing to subscribe, that's why I don't do the sub4sub thing. I just want to give people that like my videos incentive to sub.
So based on your logic here... what video are they subscribing for? You may aswell have made this a thread advertising your channel.
If youre hesitant on subscribing to someone, such as yourself, who puts out.. lets call it a series... where the videos are roughly the same idea and layout.... then why would you subscribe because they "promise" to put out another video of the same concept?
Making videos is the incentive to sub. If im subscribed to you.. I expect more videos... Saying your going to make a video is redundant.. because thats what people are expecting in the first place.
Advertise your channel. Thats great. I may have subscribed. But saying you want X amount of subscribing so that you will release X video is kind of stupid (for want of a less disrespectful word). -
Giggletron wrote: »If youre hesitant on subscribing to someone, such as yourself, who puts out.. lets call it a series... where the videos are roughly the same idea and layout.... then why would you subscribe because they "promise" to put out another video of the same concept?
...Seriously? Obviously people aren't going to subscribe if the videos are random and don't have anything to do with each other. FPSRussia for example, he has tons of subscribers, and his videos are all pretty much the same but with different guns. HDStarcraft, same thing. He comments on pro games, you can't get too creative with that, but he still has a ton of subscribers.Giggletron wrote: »Making videos is the incentive to sub. If im subscribed to you.. I expect more videos... Saying your going to make a video is redundant.. because thats what people are expecting in the first place.
Thank you for proving my point. People that are subscribed expect more videos, and I won't stop making more videos, so the people that are subscribed have nothing to worry about.
People that aren't subscribed but want more videos should subscribe, it's very simple.Giggletron wrote: »Advertise your channel. Thats great. I may have subscribed. But saying you want X amount of subscribing so that you will release X video is kind of stupid (for want of a less disrespectful word).
Your opinion. -
GodsGunman wrote: »...Seriously? Obviously people aren't going to subscribe if the videos are random and don't have anything to do with each other. FPSRussia for example, he has tons of subscribers, and his videos are all pretty much the same but with different guns. HDStarcraft, same thing. He comments on pro games, you can't get too creative with that, but he still has a ton of subscribers.
Thank you for proving my point. People that are subscribed expect more videos, and I won't stop making more videos, so the people that are subscribed have nothing to worry about.
People that aren't subscribed but want more videos should subscribe, it's very simple.
Your opinion.
You just admitted MY point.
Why offer a video at 300 subs if people are going to subscribe for the videos you put out anyway? Just put it out and get the subs.
Youre trying to squeeze as many subs as you can by this route.
Denying it will make you look even dumber.
Its stupid. No its not my opinion.. its common sense. -
Giggletron wrote: »Why offer a video at 300 subs if people are going to subscribe for the videos you put out anyway? Just put it out and get the subs.
I already stated why I was doing this, guess you didn't read:GodsGunman wrote: »Meh I figured I'd just do this once to get a kick-start
Basically this 300 subscribers thing is for the money, and I already stated I'm only doing it once.
This is the 2nd thing that I've asked from the community, the first was the header for my collection of information thread. I didn't think an extra 80 subscribers to my channel was too much to ask considering the hundreds of hours I've put into the community. -
-
-
-
-
Hm..alright.
- 20 second reload rate (same as the m4 spring)
- 100% wallbang
- Same damage as other m4.
- 1 hit head.
Need anything else, dear mod?
So in your fully correct point you're saying that ALL reviews are useless, because some stats in the screen are enough to make someone purchase or not a gun.
I get you. -
Kawaii_Nek0 wrote: »I really wished gods did a little more on the aks 74u since that gun is awesome & doens't suck like the normal 74
I was thinking of it, but then I decided not to because it wasn't an AKS-74U review :P
The end goal is to review every weapon in the game, so all hope is not lost yet :P
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 955 CrossFire Announcements
- 945 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 602 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 705 CrossFire Support
- 52 Suggestion
- 116 Bugs
- 29 CrossFire Guides
- 166 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic
