German and Japanese
Comments
-
-
Explains the term h-manga, good to know.
The term hentai is generally used as slang in japanese for pervert or perverted also. The correct or direct translation would be what Rawr said. However when you say "h-manga* it's perverted manga. Ecchi is used also although I'm not sure what the direct comparison is. -
The term hentai is generally used as slang in japanese for pervert or perverted also. The correct or direct translation would be what Rawr said. However when you say "h-manga* it's perverted manga. Ecchi is used also although I'm not sure what the direct comparison is.
Ecchi pretty much means the same thing.
The whole thing with people thinking that these words mean something else came as a result of chan and newfags. -
RawrJafrikan wrote: »Ecchi pretty much means the same thing.
The whole thing with people thinking that these words mean something else came as a result of chan and newfags.
Meh. You CAN use them to say those things, calling someone hentai does mean that you are calling them perverted but it is a word with a more broad meaning. -
RawrJafrikan wrote: »How does that have anything to do with how well or how bad my sources are? If anything, the sources you have are going to be completely skewed beliefs, backed by personal insight rather than numbers.
Get me some numbers before you claim something as obscure as that.
Only the Dango. I still like Tokyo's life better than that of Kyoto. That and everytime I go, I usually stay at my Grandma's house which is in Hitachi.
Ahhh the misconceptions. Hentai just literally means "Weird make up of" or "Weird principled", it doesn't necessarily have to refer to manga and that, but rather any type of perverted thoughts.
How are books and diaries skewed.......... and what is your source -
How are books and diaries skewed.......... and what is your source
http://www.amazon.com/Japans-Secret-Aircraft-Carrying-Strike-Submarine/dp/1902109457
http://www.amazon.com/Luftwaffe-Advanced-Aircraft-Projects-1945/dp/1857802403/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1320274966&sr=1-2
http://www.amazon.com/Japanese-Secret-Projects-Experimental-1939-1945/dp/1857803175/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1320274966&sr=1-1
And then like a bunch of History channel documentaries on these beasts.
I've also read a bunch of other texts concerning Japan (how it was able to become a superpower) and their economy:
http://www.amazon.com/Enigma-Japanese-Power-Politics-Stateless/dp/0679728023/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1320275036&sr=1-1
http://www.amazon.com/Modern-History-Japan-Tokugawa-Present/dp/0195339223/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1320275070&sr=1-2
http://www.amazon.com/Japan-J-Lewe-van-Aduard/dp/9024704006/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1320275144&sr=1-2
^The first two of these texts (Enigma and Modern History) I own, the others I got from the library.
Most of these are mostly skewed to support the whitewashed Japan/American history, but Karel does give some light on topics which are usually briefed such as Japan's wartime mentality, nihonjinron, etc. -
RawrJafrikan wrote: »http://www.amazon.com/Japans-Secret-Aircraft-Carrying-Strike-Submarine/dp/1902109457
http://www.amazon.com/Luftwaffe-Advanced-Aircraft-Projects-1945/dp/1857802403/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1320274966&sr=1-2
http://www.amazon.com/Japanese-Secret-Projects-Experimental-1939-1945/dp/1857803175/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1320274966&sr=1-1
And then like a bunch of History channel documentaries on these beasts.
I've also read a bunch of other texts concerning Japan (how it was able to become a superpower) and their economy:
http://www.amazon.com/Enigma-Japanese-Power-Politics-Stateless/dp/0679728023/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1320275036&sr=1-1
http://www.amazon.com/Modern-History-Japan-Tokugawa-Present/dp/0195339223/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1320275070&sr=1-2
http://www.amazon.com/Japan-J-Lewe-van-Aduard/dp/9024704006/ref=sr_1_2?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1320275144&sr=1-2
^The first two of these texts (Enigma and Modern History) I own, the others I got from the library.
Most of these are mostly skewed to support the whitewashed Japan/American history, but Karel does give some light on topics which are usually briefed such as Japan's wartime mentality, nihonjinron, etc.
and do you honestly believe that america didn't have any of this technology? -
and do you honestly believe that america didn't have any of this technology?
Most of the technology, American companies did not have, as these books state.
Nearly all modern day technology was taken from Germany, and then adapted for Cold war purposes. The Russians did the same exact thing.
Its one more reason that the Americans dropped the Atomic bomb twice. They didn't want any Russian influence whatsoever in Japan for primarily economic and political reasons, but also due to the large specialized middle class that Japan had to offer. -
RawrJafrikan wrote: »Most of the technology, American companies did not have.
Nearly all modern day technology was taken from Germany, and then adapted for Cold war purposes. The Russians did the same exact thing.
Its one more reason that the Americans dropped the Atomic bomb twice. They didn't want any Russian influence whatsoever in Japan for primarily economic and political reasons, but also due to the large specialized middle class that Japan had to offer.
actually most of the stuff we get that is important is from Japan, me and my dad both work on projects for the military and car companies, some of it is german as far as the engineering but most of the electronic parts is Japanese and programming, they also had a 3rd bomb that no one talks about
, also it is said we had a stealth fighter jet toward 1944, which turned into this later
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-117_Nighthawk
declassified in the 80s
it would blow your mind away to see what the military has now and it won't be released any time soon, that is why the american's didn't look so advanced during the war.. -
also it is said we had a stealth fighter jet toward 1944, which turned into this later
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-117_Nighthawk
declassified in the 80s
it would blow your mind away to see what the military has now and it won't be released any time soon, that is why the american's didn't look so advanced during the war..
Yes but the initial design was by the Germans I'm pretty sure with the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horten_Ho_229
It probably would, considering that the US military has a giant ass budget with nearly 50 billion dollars with the Pentagon saying that they can't account for where that money went.
Boeing has a similar plane with their http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/b2bomber/ and that plane literally has like 122 feet of wingspan ( don't quote me on that) and has the radar signature of a goose. -
RawrJafrikan wrote: »Yes but the initial design was by the Germans I'm pretty sure with the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horten_Ho_229
It probably would, considering that the US military has a giant ass budget with nearly 50 billion dollars with the Pentagon saying that they can't account for where that money went.
Boeing has a similar plane with their http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/b2bomber/ and that plane literally has like 122 feet of wingspan ( don't quote me on that) and has the radar signature of a goose.
still waiting for boeing to implement a shopping cart on their website -
RawrJafrikan wrote: »Yes but the initial design was by the Germans I'm pretty sure with the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horten_Ho_229
It probably would, considering that the US military has a giant ass budget with nearly 50 billion dollars with the Pentagon saying that they can't account for where that money went.
Boeing has a similar plane with their http://www.boeing.com/defense-space/military/b2bomber/ and that plane literally has like 122 feet of wingspan ( don't quote me on that) and has the radar signature of a goose.
B-2 is a fcking waste of money and of no strategical value what so ever in any war the US will have.
First, the US would be scared to use it, since it costs 2 billions dollars.
Second, there is already the F-117. -
B-2 is a fcking waste of money and of no strategical value what so ever in any war the US will have.
First, the US would be scared to use it, since it costs 2 billions dollars.
Second, there is already the F-117.
Maybe, but now they have drones. Much better. -
-
-
RawrJafrikan wrote: »AWR is a very heated individual.
And Jig, you are a bigger troll than most people here.
Can't wait for you to respond with a even more smart ass comment about how you are not a troll.
InB4 CSB
I even shout on TS when I die in FFA.
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 971 CrossFire Announcements
- 966 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 603 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 713 CrossFire Support
- 54 Suggestion
- 118 Bugs
- 29 CrossFire Guides
- 168 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic