Don't believe FinalShotReviews
Comments
-
[MOD]Talonblaze wrote: »Essentially CF is just a 3D shooter Chess game.
Wrong, it's more so a point and click adventure game. Those who are more aware of what's going on and can click things faster and more accurately than the one's they are playing against win.
-
Wrong, it's more so a point and click adventure game. Those who are more aware of what's going on and can click things faster and more accurately than the one's they are playing against win.
Yes, thats why LL and other competitive teams win so much right? They see and tape the mouse down? lol.
Just like Chess, CF requires a bit of thought if you want to be even decently successful.
Knowing your opponent and knowing your tools and field of play. That's always what it boils down to. Same thing with Chess. -
[MOD]Talonblaze wrote: »Yes, thats why LL and other competitive teams win so much right? They see and tape the mouse down? lol.
Just like Chess, CF requires a bit of thought if you want to be even decently successful.
Knowing your opponent and knowing your tools and field of play. That's always what it boils down to. Same thing with Chess.
QFT, i really liked ur example. -
[MOD]Talonblaze wrote: »Yes, thats why LL and other competitive teams win so much right? They see and tape the mouse down? lol.
Just like Chess, CF requires a bit of thought if you want to be even decently successful.
Knowing your opponent and knowing your tools and field of play. That's always what it boils down to. Same thing with Chess.
Yea which is why I said those that are more aware win. Lol. Yes it's about strategy but even the best strat can be upset by a kid getting a 4k while holding B site when BL rushes. -
Who cares about realod time, fire rate, etc?
If we want this stats, is more simple to open a thread and let a GM to respond us :-j
Reviews should be only "HOW THE GUN BEHAVES IN A BATTLE SITUATION" (not game play) - This can't pe explain by words.
I say here abbout tap, burst, RAMBO SPRAY and acouracy.
A GM is not going to tell you these things. Go ahead and try it.
How a gun behaves in a battle situation is personal preference a lot of the time.fsr are funny guys, and their reviews are amazing ,(not stats and others) ,actually its a game guys wtf ?, and you sir GoDZGUNman are a rat ? to post that **** in forums ? you are like a little girl --aaaa very is my candy mooomy .... just be a man !
QQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQQ
anybody that honestly think fsr is that funny shouldn't watch my reviews. You're clearly too immature for them.lmao dude do u know that they dont even care about cf anymore? dont take it to the head, and to tell you teh truth .03 seconds do not count anyway in this game, like dont get mad cause there off by about .1 -.4 seconds cause it really doesnt count anyway, and even if thier reviews are still good cause it gets to the point saying if you should buy it or not, and even if its still up to the person to buy the gun or not
It's not JUST about the exact statistics, they also say things like the minimi does the same damage as an m4a1, when it actually does the same damage as an ak-47. they say the golden desert eagle does more damage than the desert eagle scope. they say the m16a2 reloads slower than the m4a1.
you simply can't believe anything they tell you.I didn't watch FSR for the information i watched them because they were funny and entertaining >.< I'd prefer an entertaining reviewer that gets some things wrong over a boring one who is always correct.
then keep watching them.TeleTubby95 wrote: »Who the fck cares if they tell the reload time 0.00000000001 seconds wrong. Their reviews are so hilarious.
As I said above:
anybody that honestly think fsr is that funny shouldn't watch my reviews. You're clearly too immature for them.I thought we were talking about FSR, not you?
how am I biased, ignorant or egotistical?
biased: I'm finding out facts, and facts are never biased.
ignorant: Once again I'm finding out facts, therefore I'm not really ignorant either (depends on what you're talking about)
egotistical: I'm only posting this so that people don't believe what finalshotreviews says which will in turn lead the people that believe them to tell other people wrong info. It's like spreading a rumour. -
Yea which is why I said those that are more aware win. Lol. Yes it's about strategy but even the best strat can be upset by a kid getting a 4k while holding B site when BL rushes.
Indeed.
It's a game, after all, most games have quite alot of variables. I'm pretty sure there were some tables flipped during some heated Chess matches from supposedly younger and less talented players beat them.
Was mainly pointing out that, at its core. CF has a bit more depth than just point and click, just like Chess is more than moving pieces along a square board. ;p
Haha a bit off topic though; Any GR camping a site will probably get reamed for his strat. (Its legit after all). Haha so chances are the 4k will be short lived when the kickvote somes. -
ikr... It's probably God's hobby... you know, making reviews for pixelated guns on a fps game that will have no NA's within a while.
people have been saying that the game's going to die (and I'm pretty sure all the NA's leaving) since 2010.
I doubt the game will die within a few years. -
-
Well obviously FSR Reviewers have what we like to call, lives... They don't just sit there for days/weeks crunching the numbers, calculating the figures, blah blah blah, no they review guns on their effectiveness in-game. And I guess I am immature because I enjoy the comedy they inject into their reviews (makes them less boring, unlike yours....) People do want to be enformed and shown how good a gun is statistically and effectiveness in-game. They however want to have FUN in this game, not be forced to be given a history lesson, on every darn aspect of a gun, with a mile long sheet of the figures that "you" found.... Plus your voice on your reviews, is well like my math teacher when I was in highschool, very monotone and drab, with little to no excitement value what so ever... And another thing, calling out someones videos who have been a source of entertainment for a while now, and yelling from the rooftop on how they frigged up on the FEW videos that you have actually watched, and tooting your own horn, and proclaiming yourself the review messiah of CF, is egotistical and childish. I however wish you the best of luck with your reviews, and hopefully you will start interjecting some entertainment value and humor into them, so that not just the nerds of cf will enjoy them...
-
[MOD]Talonblaze wrote: »Indeed.
It's a game, after all, most games have quite alot of variables. I'm pretty sure there were some tables flipped during some heated Chess matches from supposedly younger and less talented players beat them.
Was mainly pointing out that, at its core. CF has a bit more depth than just point and click, just like Chess is more than moving pieces along a square board. ;p
Haha a bit off topic though; Any GR camping a site will probably get reamed for his strat. (Its legit after all). Haha so chances are the 4k will be short lived when the kickvote somes.
Man I held B site in Factory against a LL ext clan once. Oh that was a good scrim xD Rest of my team went mid/A and I had to hold it. We lost the scrim but that was a beautiful round.
And I've actually seen a kid flip over a chess match, threw the pieces everywhere. (#funny)
Also my two cents on the fsr thing. I think his reaction is justified if you kept trying to publicly humiliate them. I would insult you as well if you did that on every single one of my videos calling out 0.001 second discrepencies which could be put down to random error. There are uncertainties in even the most accurate of experiements. Which is what these reviews are at their core, an experiment with the gun to see how it performs in most general circumstances. -
Let ´em whine ther li´l hearts out -.-
Just two wannabes that make todays teens look worse than they actually are. (Or maybe I need glasses ?)
I think both of you take it too seriously, it is after all a game. As such I see it as a form of entertainment. (In this case I am lying to myself, but still, gaming is supposed to be entertaining..)
Y´all need to calm down methinks
-
I think you both put a little to much time and effort into even talking to each other ha ha but I think anyone who is approving of this guys like G4 should now leave him in the dust because I do not want to attract anymore people like that to our community.
-
I think you both put a little to much time and effort into even talking to each other ha ha but I think anyone who is approving of this guys like G4 should now leave him in the dust because I do not want to attract anymore people like that to our community.
Yeah because "OUR" community is so effing good right now.... -
DerpToDaMAX wrote: »Yeah because "OUR" community is so effing good right now....
in my opinion anyone that prefers FinalShotreviews' more than mine is what is ruining the community. People that prefer my reviews are sensible, people that prefer finalshots' reviews are 99% of the time bored kids. -
GodsGunman wrote: »in my opinion anyone that prefers FinalShotreviews' more than mine is what is ruining the community. People that prefer my reviews are sensible, people that prefer finalshots' reviews are 99% of the time bored kids.
Your reviews are OK, but you need to add some fun to it. Right now, my favorite reviewer is Guiden, even though hes not that active. I like reviewers that would talk normally (not so formally) and in the same time say the right facts. -
Your reviews are OK, but you need to add some fun to it. Right now, my favorite reviewer is Guiden, even though hes not that active. I like reviewers that would talk normally (not so formally) and in the same time say the right facts.
I have no problem with people liking Guidenable, his reviews are good for the most part.
and btw my video(s) are without much expression because I edit the **** out of the audio lol. You can't tell, but every sentence or so there's a different audio clip (sometimes in the middle of the sentences I switch it out if I **** up xD)
I'm not good at public speaking or talking for a long period of time so I have to make-do with what I can do. -
^ I actually laughed in real life. Let me throw on my best country boy accent that I possibly can. "Boy, lemme tell ya what. I been firin' guns since befo you was born son. I's lived on dis her' farm fo quite some time now, ya hear? Them cows dun shoot themsefs when they dun gone bad. Dun need nuthin' but ol betty mah 10 gauge shat-gun" For me, yes I have fired "a gun" before. Most people have either been hunting, or have fired for fun. You are probably one of those people that has fired a glock and thinks he is gangsta.
Glock? Lmao, are you kidding me? A Glock?
I am highly confident that one of the many rifles I have fired can put anything you've fired to shame. Have you ever heard of James Purdey? If not, gtfo. -
GodsGunman wrote: »in my opinion anyone that prefers FinalShotreviews' more than mine is what is ruining the community. People that prefer my reviews are sensible, people that prefer finalshots' reviews are 99% of the time bored kids.
You know why I "Prefer" FinalShotReviews over yours? They have been out a lot longer than yours, they have a lot more reviews, than yours. Their reviews are way more entertaining than yours are, plus they making learning about CF's guns enjoyable, compared to your "Sensible" dribble and boring as heck informative threads, and video(s). I am not saying that your reviews are crap, just would like to see some entertainment value and humor put in, so that your reviews will have info (for the older CF players) and entertainment value (for the younger CF players, who outnumber the older ones) Also posting on their video's and calling them out for inaccurate information ect. and then them responding the way they did, is childish on both sides, yes they responded poorly, but you blatantly calling them out and saying their 100% wrong on their numbers, and expecting them to respond with butterfly's and rainbows is wrong to expect out of them, since you pointed out their just some dumb teenagers... And be careful of who you call a kid, kid... -
GodsGunman wrote: »I have no problem with people liking Guidenable, his reviews are good for the most part.
and btw my video(s) are without much expression because I edit the **** out of the audio lol. You can't tell, but every sentence or so there's a different audio clip (sometimes in the middle of the sentences I switch it out if I **** up xD)
I'm not good at public speaking or talking for a long period of time so I have to make-do with what I can do.
I don't want you to not cut off the awkward/screw-ups. But.. try adding some jokes to it, you know what I mean?
-
[MOD]Talonblaze wrote: »It's a science. And usually when people are lead astray, people get angry its wrong.
If you can calculate damage, distance and accuracy with your bullet quantity, the only thing left is to also examine player speed and capabilities. Timing is also key.
All such information can be key in the competitive scene since precision is whats needed.
Think of it like chess. (If that isn't too old school for you.) People have studied that to the letter for strategies and numerous methods to beat opponents with the pieces capabilities they ahve at their disposal.
Essentially CF is just a 3D shooter Chess game.
Comparing CF to Chess?
That has got to be the worse comparison I have ever seen.
Chess is a game of intelligence, CF is a game of having reflexes and knowing where to and not to go. Chess requires you to think. CF just requires you to do this: "Hey, I've been going A for 3 rounds straight, lets go to B now." -
I think at the end of the day, most people want to get a gun that's good before buying it. That's the reviewer's job, to comment on the gun's performance and whether people should get it or not. Basically the more accurate the gun's stat, the better, so people won't complain after they found that the review isn't correct. I myself found frustrating because FSR said de gold has more power but it does not...And some of their review didn't point out the stat completely, such as wall bang, whether it's 1 shot head shot etc. IMO a perfect review should include all the stat while mixing with fun details.
-
GodsGunman wrote: »I have no problem with people liking Guidenable, his reviews are good for the most part.
and btw my video(s) are without much expression because I edit the **** out of the audio lol. You can't tell, but every sentence or so there's a different audio clip (sometimes in the middle of the sentences I switch it out if I **** up xD)
I'm not good at public speaking or talking for a long period of time so I have to make-do with what I can do.
good? are the best reviews from crossfire. -
Comparing CF to Chess?
That has got to be the worse comparison I have ever seen.
Chess is a game of intelligence, CF is a game of having reflexes and knowing where to and not to go. Chess requires you to think. CF just requires you to do this: "Hey, I've been going A for 3 rounds straight, lets go to B now."
We'll see how well your next competitive section goes and then tell me its just tape a mouse button down and then choose A or B.
I'll be expecting your win.
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.3K CrossFire
- 990 CrossFire Announcements
- 985 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 121 Modes
- 611 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 718 CrossFire Support
- 54 Suggestion
- 120 Bugs
- 29 CrossFire Guides
- 169 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic