Please make 2nd LT or higher only server
Comments
-
I'm all for it.
Butterstick or something, not higher, not lower. Even if you stole it, losing a butterstick-account hurts.
It shouldn't be +GP or +EXP though, there should be no incentive to cheat on the server.
Hackers will soon find that they might as well cheat on rookie, because they'll get reported faster, kicked more often and earn less than on the GP+ servers. -
I'm all for it.
Butterstick or something, not higher, not lower. Even if you stole it, losing a butterstick-account hurts.
It shouldn't be +GP or +EXP though, there should be no incentive to cheat on the server.
Hackers will soon find that they might as well cheat on rookie, because they'll get reported faster, kicked more often and earn less than on the GP+ servers.
yaay a mod supports the idea -
No, its already built in to the game its probably just a matter of deciding players that won't be allowed on there versus player that would play there, and if that math turns out to profit.Cant take much coding to change Uk 5 to second or first lt only.
UK 5 is sitting empty 23 hours a day - still costing a lot of money keeping it up - so to me its easy enough math.
Would make a server that is not being used in to one of the most used servers, and probably with a fair amount of ZP spent on EXP+ items, making the decision highly profitable. -
No, its already built in to the game its probably just a matter of deciding players that won't be allowed on there versus player that would play there, and if that math turns out to profit.
UK 5 is sitting empty 23 hours a day - still costing a lot of money keeping it up - so to me its easy enough math.
Would make a server that is not being used in to one of the most used servers, and probably with a fair amount of ZP spent on EXP+ items, making the decision highly profitable.
That is one of very few things i agree with you on.
I think its a good idea but its down to the gms to decide to do it or not
Hopefully one will see this thread and have a think about it 
-
No, its already built in to the game its probably just a matter of deciding players that won't be allowed on there versus player that would play there, and if that math turns out to profit.
UK 5 is sitting empty 23 hours a day - still costing a lot of money keeping it up - so to me its easy enough math.
Would make a server that is not being used in to one of the most used servers, and probably with a fair amount of ZP spent on EXP+ items, making the decision highly profitable.
We have a UK SERVER 5 ? W00t Oo Never noticed it -
-
-.- and where to find players to join your game?
oh gosh just make your own room with password.Its safe and hack free.Is it so easy? yes90% less hackers, 98% less players. Even Delta doesn't get more than 2 servers full (Excluding D9)on a regular weekday. A 2nd LT server would be a ghost city.
I asked a lot of players in game if they would be interested in LT and higher only server and all of them agreed. I don't think that server would be empty.Suhu_uNknoWn wrote: »WDF guys, stp being so ignorant !
Yeah you have seen 10 major hackers, you ve seen many 2nd LT hacking, but MOST hackers are lower ranks, deal with it or buy some logic lessons, nabs. 100% agreeHitman_XLVII wrote: »Thats big...
I aint no where near a 2nd liutenant
does that mean i have to live with the hackers? QQ
There are so many servers, why do you want to play on that LT only server?I'm all for it.
Butterstick or something, not higher, not lower. Even if you stole it, losing a butterstick-account hurts.
It shouldn't be +GP or +EXP though, there should be no incentive to cheat on the server.
Hackers will soon find that they might as well cheat on rookie, because they'll get reported faster, kicked more often and earn less than on the GP+ servers.
You are my favourite MOD now. -
-
but if they make a 2nd lt + server , the ammount of hacks on it will be soo low every 2nd lt + go to the server,all the other servers will become noobish and unplayable since, most of the fair playing , and friendly community is mainly 2nd lts +..., most of the hakers wont be kiked and more pros will get kiked in the other servers..not fair for the innocent low levels. so i DISAGREE with this idea.
-
newtonking wrote: »but if they make a 2nd lt + server , the ammount of hacks on it will be soo low every 2nd lt + go to the server,all the other servers will become noobish and unplayable since, most of the fair playing , and friendly community is mainly 2nd lts +..., most of the hakers wont be kiked and more pros will get kiked in the other servers..not fair for the innocent low levels. so i DISAGREE with this idea.
I never thought about that.
Now I want this server even more lol -
Gh0st_Slay3r wrote: »That is one of very few things i agree with you on.
I think its a good idea but its down to the gms to decide to do it or not Hopefully one will see this thread and have a think about it
Naw, most of my opinions are agreeable, this one is hard to misunderstand though.NanoCooper wrote: »We have a UK SERVER 5 ? W00t Oo Never noticed it
This is exactly why making it a higher ranked server wouldn't be a loss, people barely know it exists.
bump in disguise -
People say they have seen a lot of high ranked hackers, but the amount of high ranked hackers is DWARFED compared to alternate/ low ranked accounts.
Additionally, having higher ranked players in a room, and one hacker showing up, most people would have the sense to kick him immediately. -
ya it's a good idea, but that server should be for captains and higher ranks.
no, i don't have rank captain so don't even try to troll.
nahh captain is a bit too high, i dont even see many butterbars hacking, ill see one now and again but its very rare. Im captain and still disagree with the required rank to be that high. -
Thats just because there are very few captains.because there are many players with 2nd and 1st LT that have 1 shot kill or other types of hak.
i saw just few captains hacking...
If one out of ten smileys cheat, and one out of ten captains cheat, you're gonna see a lot more smiley cheaters.
Because there are thousand and thousands of smileys, but a lot less captains. -
Sounds like a good idea, but if it was going to be just a UK server then it would not help me much living in the US, my ping would be a lot higher. never played in a UK server but i know my ping would be over 100.
one of the NA servers should be 2nd lt and one of the UK servers 2nd lt -
Thats just because there are very few captains.
If one out of ten smileys cheat, and one out of ten captains cheat, you're gonna see a lot more smiley cheaters.
Because there are thousand and thousands of smileys, but a lot less captains.
ya that's true, but when server is restrict to ''captains and higher ranks'' we can easily report if someone hacks, because more players value their accounts and they won't hack.
today i played 6 matches..and i found 1 master sargent and two 2nd LT killing from base with 1 shot kill. Is that my bad luck or there are a lot hakers with 2nd LT rank ??
-
This would only solve problems for players ranked 2nd LT+. It wouldn't actually solve anything for the game itself, except give the higher ranked players more freedom from hackers. Even then some of those people who are 2nd LT+ hack.
at im not alone now..
![[dot]](https://forum.z8games.com/uploads/customavatars/27/navatar_2942827.gif){kind=avatar}
![]Kevin](https://z8games.akamaized.net/cfna/forum/customavatars/44/navatar_7763944.jpg){kind=avatar}
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 955 CrossFire Announcements
- 950 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 602 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 705 CrossFire Support
- 52 Suggestion
- 116 Bugs
- 29 CrossFire Guides
- 166 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic