Pings Needed from South American Players updated

INGverruckt · July 2011

Montecarlo, Misiones, Argentina
the ping for me is worse than in south, im 160 in south but in brazil 282 and its close than usa :S why, im just going to stop playing this game if my ping is worse

Haciendo ping a 200.145.1.9 con 32 bytes de datos:
Respuesta desde 200.145.1.9: bytes= 32 tiempo= 282ms TTL=53
Respuesta desde 200.145.1.9: bytes= 32 tiempo= 283ms TTL=53
Respuesta desde 200.145.1.9: bytes= 32 tiempo= 282ms TTL=53
Respuesta desde 200.145.1.9: bytes= 32 tiempo= 283ms TTL=53
Estadisticas de ping para 200.145.1.9:
Paquetes enviados = 4, recibidos = 4, perdidos = 0
<0% perdidos>,
Tiempos aproximados de ida y vuelta en milisegundos:
Minimo = 282ms, Maximo = 283ms, Media = 282ms

Haciendo ping a 64.209.90.71 con 32 bytes de datos:
Respuesta desde 64.209.90.71: bytes= 32 tiempo= 257ms TTL=120
Respuesta desde 64.209.90.71: bytes= 32 tiempo= 256ms TTL=120
Respuesta desde 64.209.90.71: bytes= 32 tiempo= 256ms TTL=120
Respuesta desde 64.209.90.71: bytes= 32 tiempo= 256ms TTL=120
Estadisticas de ping para 64.209.90.71:
Paquetes enviados = 4, recibidos = 4, perdidos = 0
<0% perdidos>,
Tiempos aproximados de ida y vuelta en milisegundos:
Minimo = 256ms, Maximo = 257ms, Media = 256ms

faife · July 2011

TopSecret™

Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=43ms TTL=52
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=46ms TTL=52
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=45ms TTL=52

Country: Brazil
State:Parana
City:Cascavel

please BR server ;D

OwneDSpaawN · July 2011

Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brasil

Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brasil

Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=57ms TTL=55
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=58ms TTL=55
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=58ms TTL=55
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=59ms TTL=55

Niiick05 · July 2011

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=28ms TTL=55
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=29ms TTL=55
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=28ms TTL=55
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=29ms TTL=55

Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=143ms TTL=121
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=140ms TTL=121
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=151ms TTL=121
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=150ms TTL=121

lucasveizss · July 2011

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.

Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=19 TTL=54
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=19 TTL=54
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=19 TTL=54
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=19 TTL=54

dedealop · July 2011

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

ping 200.145.1.9

Disparando 200.145.1.9 com 32 bytes de dados:
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=30ms TTL=55
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=32ms TTL=55
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=29ms TTL=55
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=31ms TTL=55

ping 64.209.90.71

Disparando 64.209.90.71 com 32 bytes de dados:
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=168ms TTL=123
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=171ms TTL=123
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=172ms TTL=123
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=171ms TTL=123

covinha · July 2011

Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

ping 200.145.1.9

Disparando 200.145.1.9 com 32 bytes de dados:
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=29ms TTL=56
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=30ms TTL=56
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=31ms TTL=56
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=30ms TTL=55

ping 64.209.90.71

Disparando 64.209.90.71 com 32 bytes de dados:
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=168ms TTL=124
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=155ms TTL=124
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=161ms TTL=124
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=158ms TTL=124

Alucinadorrr · July 2011

Osasco, SP.
Brasil.

Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=44ms TTL=54
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=43ms TTL=54
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=265ms TTL=54
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=42ms TTL=54

Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=213ms TTL=119
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=209ms TTL=119
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=207ms TTL=119
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=231ms TTL=119

xShadows10 · July 2011

Gama, Brasília - Brazil
Ping 200.145.1.9
Disparando 200.145.1.9 com 32 bytes de dados:

Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=23ms TTL=55
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=23ms TTL=55
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=24ms TTL=55
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=24ms TTL=55

ping 64.209.90.71

Disparando 64.209.90.71 com 32 bytes de dados:

Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=132ms TTL=121
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=132ms TTL=121
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=132ms TTL=121
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=132ms TTL=121

RedBlack13 · July 2011

Brasil, São Paulo, Cubatão.

Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=58ms TTL=54
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=46ms TTL=54
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=46ms TTL=54
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=46ms TTL=54

Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=211ms TTL=119
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=218ms TTL=120
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=234ms TTL=120
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=218ms TTL=120

itachiuzumak · July 2011

Brasil,São Paulo,São Paulo.

Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=11ms TTL=56
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=11ms TTL=56
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=11ms TTL=56
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=11ms TTL=56

Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=168ms TTL=119
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=169ms TTL=119
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=170ms TTL=119
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=168ms TTL=119

Erwin010 · July 2011

Santa Cruz, Bolivia
Lol only Brazilians get low ping -.- ...

Respuesta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=260ms TTL=51
Respuesta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=271ms TTL=51
Respuesta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=269ms TTL=51
Respuesta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=273ms TTL=51

Respuesta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=203ms TTL=120
Respuesta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=190ms TTL=120
Respuesta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=188ms TTL=120
Respuesta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=191ms TTL=120

lukinhavf1 · July 2011

Crossfire Brasil

País: Brasil
Estado: SP
Cidade: São Paulo
Idade: 16 anos
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=35ms TTL=54
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=37ms TTL=54
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=34ms TTL=54
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=34ms TTL=54

Country: Brazil
State: SP
City: Sao Paulo
Age: 16 years
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes = 32 time = 35ms TTL = 54
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes = 32 time = 37ms TTL = 54
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes = 32 time = 34ms TTL = 54
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes = 32 time = 34ms TTL = 54

DupL3x · July 2011

Come server br please

Disparando 200.145.1.9 com 32 bytes de dados:
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=13ms TTL=57
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=29ms TTL=57
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=13ms TTL=57
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=13ms TTL=57

Estatísticas do Ping para 200.145.1.9:
Pacotes: Enviados = 4, Recebidos = 4, Perdidos = 0 (0% de
perda),
Aproximar um número redondo de vezes em milissegundos:
Mínimo = 13ms, Máximo = 29ms, Média = 17ms

ladygagax3 · July 2011

Ping:200.145.1.9
Resposta de 200.145.1.9:bytes=32 tempo=59ms TTL=52
Resposta de 200.145.1.9:bytes=32 tempo=55ms TTL=52
Resposta de 200.145.1.9:bytes=32 tempo=57ms TTL=52
Resposta de 200.145.1.9:bytes=32 tempo=55ms TTL=52

Ping:64.209.90.71
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: byte=32 tempo=225ms TTL=118
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: byte=32 tempo=216ms TTL=117
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: byte=32 tempo=235ms TTL=117
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: byte=32 tempo=226ms TTL=118

Cidade:Catanduva
Estado:São Paulo
Pais: Brasil

MikeDaSpike · July 2011

Pinging 200.145.1.9 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=211ms TTL=250
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=218ms TTL=250
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=206ms TTL=250
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=217ms TTL=250

Ping statistics for 200.145.1.9:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 206ms, Maximum = 218ms, Average = 213ms

Pinging 64.209.90.71 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=250
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=250
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=250
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=132ms TTL=250

Ping statistics for 64.209.90.71:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 130ms, Maximum = 140ms, Average = 133ms

I live in Lima, Perú.

SrBob · July 2011

Country: Brazil
State: São Paulo
City: São José do Rio Preto

Ping 200.145.1.9

Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=52ms TTL=53
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=51ms TTL=53
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=52ms TTL=53
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=51ms TTL=53

Estatísticas do ping para 200.145.1.9:
Pacotes: Enviados = 4, Recebidos = 4, Perdidos = 0 (0% de perda),
Aproximar um numero redondo de vezes em milissegundos:
Minimo = 51ms, Máximo = 52ms, Média = 51ms

####################

Ping 64.209.90.71

Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=214ms TTL=119
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=228ms TTL=118
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=217ms TTL=117
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=224ms TTL=119

Estatísticas do ping para 64.209.90.71:
Pacotes: Enviados = 4, Recebidos = 4, Perdidos = 0 (0% de perda),
Aproximar um numero redondo de vezes em milissegundos:
Minimo = 214ms, Máximo = 228ms, Média = 220ms

lucas00513 · July 2011

Pings Needed from South American Players Brazilians

Pinging 200.145.1.9 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=250
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=250
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=20ms TTL=250
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=21ms TTL=250

Ping statistics for 200.145.1.9:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 21ms, Maximum = 21ms, Average = 20ms

Pinging 64.209.90.71 with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=140ms TTL=250
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=250
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=130ms TTL=250
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=132ms TTL=250

freework · July 2011

Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=108TTL=53
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=99 TTL=53
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=78 TTL=53
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=102 TTL=53

Country: Brazil
State: Alagoas
City: Palmeira dos Índios

gokeeer7000 · July 2011

am from Giza,cairo,egypt near south africa we r in north aferica

pinging 200.145.1.9 with 32 bytes of data :

replay from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time =316ms TTL=48
REPLAY FROM 200.145.1.9: BYTES=32 TIME=331MS TTL=48
REPLAY FROM 200.145.1.9: BYTES=32 TIME=316MS TTL=48
REPLAY FROM 200.145.1.9: BYTES=32 TIME=322ms TTL=48

PACKETS: Sent =4, Received =4, Lost =0 (0% Loss).
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
minimum = 316ms, Max = 331ms, Average = 321ms

btw my speed is 512 kps Service provider TEData InGame Ping : 101 to 140

99887766 · July 2011

Disparando contra 200.145.1.9 bytes de dados:

Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=31ms TTL=53
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=25ms TTL=53
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=65ms TTL=53
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=31ms TTL=53

Disparando contra 64.209.90.71 bytes de dados:

Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=168ms TTL=117
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=162ms TTL=117
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=187ms TTL=117
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=270ms TTL=117

Jerônimo Monteiro, Espírito Santo, Brasil.

sssssadf · July 2011

Cidade:Rio de Janeiro
Estado:Rio de Janeiro
Pais: Brasil

Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=38 TTL=54
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=38 TTL=54
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=37 TTL=54
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=37 TTL=54

StiflerSK · July 2011

Santa Maria, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brasil.

Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=846 TTL=53
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=692 TTL=53
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=364 TTL=53
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=737 TTL=53

DocBrownRGS · July 2011

Uruguaiana, Rio grande do sul, Brasil

Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=74ms TTL=54
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=70ms TTL=54
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=71ms TTL=54
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=69ms TTL=54

jhugvyt · July 2011

Estado:Rio De Janeiro
Cidade:Rio De Janeiro
País:Brazil

Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=28ms TTL=56
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=28ms TTL=56
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=29ms TTL=56
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=28ms TTL=55

StiflerSK · July 2011

Santa Maria, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brasil

Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=195 TTL=120
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=195 TTL=120
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=195 TTL=120
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 time=225 TTL=120

m4niN · July 2011

Corumba,Mato Grosso do Sul , Brasil

Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=205ms TTL=118
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=209ms TTL=118
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=197ms TTL=118
Resposta de 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=198ms TTL=118

iNooob13 · July 2011

Contagem, Minas Gerais, Brasil
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=30ms TTL=55
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=31ms TTL=55
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=30ms TTL=55
Resposta de 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 tempo=31ms TTL=55

mateuzin_NKF · July 2011

Cidade:Rio de Janeiro
Estado:Rio de Janeiro
Pais:Brasil

Reply from 174.137.125.79: bytes=32 Time=145 TLL=235
Reply from 174.137.125.79: bytes=32 Time=143 TLL=236
Reply from 174.137.125.79: bytes=32 Time=138 TLL=236
Reply from 174.137.125.79: bytes=32 Time=132 TLL=235

ElxPaLix · July 2011

Palix

Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=248ms TTL=51
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=249ms TTL=51
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=272ms TTL=51
Reply from 200.145.1.9: bytes=32 time=249ms TTL=51

Iquique,iquique,Chile/north of chile

Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=162ms TTL=121
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=164ms TTL=121
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=144ms TTL=121
Reply from 64.209.90.71: bytes=32 tempo=147ms TTL=121

Pings Needed from South American Players updated

Comments

Categories

Pings Needed from South American Players *updated*

Comments

Categories

Pings Needed from South American Players updated