Idk if anyone noticed..

13

Comments

  • DatCookz wrote: »
    Azn maids and butlers, and after that last $3.5m dorra expansion on the property, this is now officially a mansion son, so it's to our dining hall we venture for flaminyon and lobster.

    Awwwe, was your bf unable to carry on with his intellect show and asked you for some support?
  • Nescafee wrote: »
    Awwwe, was your bf unable to carry on with his intellect show and asked you for some support?

    Come at me bro.
    DatMuffin wrote: »
    Oh, I certainly hope Sebastian hasn't bought the caviar from that dreadful market like he did last time. His argument that the caviar was only a few hours old was simply untenable.

    I wasn't too fond of that caviar either, but don't worry, I had Sebastian killed.

    He shan't be making that mistake again.
  • Nescafee wrote: »
    Did you just triple check your sentence structure again up there ---^
    Spot on? kid, I can mop the floor with your face intellectually, verbally and lets not go to physically. I truly feel sorry for you muffinboy..

    Apparently "lets" is a contraction.

    You are looking for "let's."

    If you are going to mop the floor with my face intellectually at least use intellect to do it. Although from your statement in which you immediately brought up your physical strength I can presume that you are nothing more than a brute with a G.E.D who thinks he has what it takes to fight with someone who held a 4.0 GPA throughout his education.
  • DatCookz wrote: »
    Come at me bro.



    I wasn't too fond of that caviar either, but don't worry, I had him killed.

    Shan't be making that mistake again.

    Meet me @ Starbucks Mainland Van.
  • Moofz do you remember nolifers?

    Yeah he was pretty much the last of the decent troll competition in this place, shame he left tbh.
    Nescafee wrote: »
    Meet me @ Starbucks Mainland Van.

    I'm certainly not getting in your van.
  • Nescafee wrote: »
    Meet me @ Starbucks Mainland Van.

    A Starbucks? Cookz and I would never lower ourselves to entering such a cheap and dirty establishment.

    Surely you would rather meet us at Bon Sejour.

    It is a nice little French restaurant a short drive away from our estate.
  • DatMuffin wrote: »
    A Starbucks? Cookz and I would never lower ourselves to entering such a cheap and dirty establishment.

    Surely you would rather meet us at Bon Sejour.

    It is a nice little French restaurant a short drive away from our estate.

    The pheasant they serve there is quite delightful.
  • DatCookz wrote: »
    The pheasant they serve there is quite delightful.

    I found their le veau to be to my liking. It had an excellent flavor.
  • DatMuffin wrote: »
    I found their le veau to be to my liking. It had an excellent flavor.

    Oh, I've just realised that I said "pheasant", I actually meant 'peasant'.

    Poor people are so delightfully scrumptious.
  • DatCookz wrote: »
    Oh, I've just realised that I said "pheasant", I actually meant 'peasant'.

    Poor people are so delightfully scrumptious.

    Oh my, I have just found that your instant messaging account is not logged on. How curious, is there a reason for this?
  • DatMuffin wrote: »
    Apparently "lets" is a contraction.

    You are looking for "let's."

    If you are going to mop the floor with my face intellectually at least use intellect to do it. Although from your statement in which you immediately brought up your physical strength I can presume that you are nothing more than a brute with a G.E.D who thinks he has what it takes to fight with someone who held a 4.0 GPA throughout his education.

    4.0 GPA? ROFLMFAO!!! lets can also be used without the apostrophe you dimwit. Back to high school muffin. If you have a slight bit of brain you would not be calling yourself sexy and charming not to mention having some intellect. It was supposed to be a joke when I said physically but I don't think you're smart enough to pick up on it. But hey, if I know I can beat your ass up at that too why not say right? Take your fail elsewhere kid you're no match for me.
  • DatMuffin wrote: »
    Oh my, I have just found that your instant messaging account is not logged on. How curious, is there a reason for this?

    Jefferson, you know, the delightful black fellow, hasn't connected my broadband service as he had promised.

    I'm thinking of having him sold if these shenaniggans continue.
  • DatCookz wrote: »
    Jefferson, you know, the delightful black fellow, hasn't connected my broadband service as he had promised.

    I'm thinking of having him sold if these shena****ns continue.

    9k posts? Ever heard of life before?
  • Nescafee wrote: »
    4.0 GPA? ROFLMFAO!!! lets can also be used without the apostrophe you dimwit. Back to high school muffin. If you have a slight bit of brain you would not be calling yourself sexy and charming not to mention having some intellect. It was supposed to be a joke when I said physically but I don't think you're smart enough to pick up on it. But hey, if I know I can beat your ass up at that too why not say right? Take your fail elsewhere kid you're no match for me.

    You're right, lets can be used without an apostrophe, but not in the context you were using it.

    To let means to "allow".

    Let him in. = Allow him to come in.

    The word "let's" means "let us"

    The first comes with the pronoun "us".
    The second does not come with the pronoun "us".


    She lets [allows] him to paint. = She allows him to paint.

    So the rule is that when you mean let us, or allow us, or permits us, you use let's.

    The following examples do not have the plural pronoun [us] contraction so no apostrophe is used.

    She lets me paint. = She allows me to paint.
    She lets them paint. = She allows them to paint.
    She lets him or her paint. She allows him or her to paint.
  • Nescafee wrote: »
    9k posts? Ever heard of life before?

    That's a new one, you should write a book.


    DatMuffin wrote: »
    You're right, lets can be used without an apostrophe, but not in the context you were using it.

    To let means to "allow".

    Let him in. = Allow him to come in.

    The word "let's" means "let us"

    The first comes with the pronoun "us".
    The second does not come with the pronoun "us".


    She lets [allows] him to paint. = She allows him to paint.

    So the rule is that when you mean let us, or allow us, or permits us, you use let's.

    The following examples do not have the plural pronoun [us] contraction so no apostrophe is used.

    She lets me paint. = She allows me to paint.
    She lets them paint. = She allows them to paint.
    She lets him or her paint. She allows him or her to paint.

    #shutdown
  • DatMuffin wrote: »
    You're right, lets can be used without an apostrophe, but not in the context you were using it.

    To let means to "allow".

    Let him in. = Allow him to come in.

    The word "let's" means "let us"

    The first comes with the pronoun "us".
    The second does not come with the pronoun "us".


    She lets [allows] him to paint. = She allows him to paint.

    So the rule is that when you mean let us, or allow us, or permits us, you use let's.

    The following examples do not have the plural pronoun [us] contraction so no apostrophe is used.

    She lets me paint. = She allows me to paint.
    She lets them paint. = She allows them to paint.
    She lets him or her paint. She allows him or her to paint.

    OMG!! Not only are you dumb as I thought you are, you're dumber than shiit kid.
  • Nescafee wrote: »
    OMG!! Not only are you dumb as I thought you are, you're dumber than shiit kid.

    Considering I took that entire thing directly from an English class forum you are the stupid one.

    That was written by an English professor, want the link to the forum post?

    Get off the forums you terrible troll, you are giving me a headache.

    Cookz have Sebastian fetch me the aspirins.
  • It appears that this thread is continuing for no obvious reasons.
  • Don't know if trolling.

    Or just really really dumb.




    Sebastian said we're out of aspirins.

    I'll order our private doctor from his residence, post haste.
  • DatMuffin wrote: »
    You're right, lets can be used without an apostrophe, but not in the context you were using it.

    To let means to "allow".

    Let him in. = Allow him to come in.

    The word "let's" means "let us"

    The first comes with the pronoun "us".
    The second does not come with the pronoun "us".


    She lets [allows] him to paint. = She allows him to paint.

    So the rule is that when you mean let us, or allow us, or permits us, you use let's.

    The following examples do not have the plural pronoun [us] contraction so no apostrophe is used.

    She lets me paint. = She allows me to paint.
    She lets them paint. = She allows them to paint.
    She lets him or her paint. She allows him or her to paint.

    What the sentence meant in simple English is: LET US NOT GO THERE. Did I break it down to you this time or still having some trouble?
  • i saw his alt today. I asked him why he doesnt farm, and than he answered he dont need to farm anymore. Now i know why xD
  • Nescafee wrote: »
    What the sentence meant in simple English is: LET US NOT GO THERE. Did I break it down to you this time or still having some trouble?

    IT CAN'T SAY LET US NOT GO THERE WITHOUT AN APOSTROPHE.

    That is why the apostrophe is there, it forms a contraction of two different words.

    Let and us.
  • Nescafee wrote: »
    OMG!! Not only are you dumb as I thought you are, you're dumber than shiit kid.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PTAXUYLbFYk
  • DatMuffin wrote: »
    Considering I took that entire thing directly from an English class forum you are the stupid one.

    That was written by an English professor, want the link to the forum post?

    Get off the forums you terrible troll, you are giving me a headache.

    Cookz have Sebastian fetch me the aspirins.

    I love trolling you and your bf. Don't pretend to be smart kid, its so damn obvious you're not. Come to my level then start talking. Step outside and get some fresh air already.
  • Nescafee wrote: »
    I love trolling you and your bf. Don't pretend to be smart kid, its so damn obvious you're not. Come to my level then start talking. Step outside and get some fresh air already.

    Again, its is not a contraction.

    Its is a possessive form of it and is an attributive adjective.

    It's is a contraction of the words it and is.

    You can't even do 5th grade English and you are challenging a man who made Harvard professors look bad?
  • DatCookz wrote: »
    That's a new one, you should write a book.





    #shutdown

    Kid, I don't think you blessed with enough brains to realize your post count shows the lack of life you have. Still arguing over that?
  • Wait, I thought I was the girl in this relationship?

    Kid's so forgetful.
  • Nescafee wrote: »
    Kid, I don't think you blessed with enough brains to realize your post count shows the lack of life you have. Still arguing over that?

    I don't think you blessed?

    Seriously, you are so stupid you can't even string together a dependent clause.
  • Nescafee wrote: »
    Kid, I don't think you blessed with enough brains to realize your post count shows the lack of life you have. Still arguing over that?

    Kid, I don't think you're blessed with enough brain power to realise you couldn't skip Harvard and pass like me and Moof did.
    DatMuffin wrote: »
    Again, its is not a contraction.

    Its is a possessive form of it and is an attributive adjective.

    It's is a contraction of the words it and is.

    You can't even do 5th grade English and you are challenging a man who made Harvard professors look bad?

    Poor people have nothing better to do, haven't you ever watched 'Jerry Springer' in the drawing room, with Augustus and I?