"Taxing" on Vote Kicks

After seeing talonblaze post and honestly thinking of any way it could be countered, then failing to do so. I wouldn't support this.

I approve of this.
To be fair, the only ones that I see kicking are usually older players or more experienced players who've already gotten their main guns, got extra gp saved up etc etc. Anyway, 100gp isnt exactly a major amount anyway. And I do agree with the idea that people would then buy zp to cover up if they did like to kick 24/7.

I always try to put in an incentive for z8 aswell when i make an idea :P

i would buy so much zp and spend it all on GP so that i could get a mass amount and kick every BR that enters my room

I think it's better to limit vote kicks to 1 per 10 or above games(NOT ROUNDS)

This feature of taxing should be added as good players are kicked all the time, the taxing of F11's would be a good idea too and leaving auto votes as free F12's or free/half price F12's would remedy the situation. Making F12's cost is a idiotic idea as no one would pay to F12 (why should they? why do they care?) but they will pay to F11 to kick an hacker.

As someone already stated earlier in this thread there are permanent kick votes boxes on the screen every single round in most games, the wholesale kicking of average/decent players should be unacceptable to any company wishing to provide a fair gaming environment and to provide a service to as many players as possible.

Kicking good players in Crossfire is a major problem and anyone saying otherwise is either a new player, not a very good player (thinks people are hacking when they are not), or mentally defunct.

As for those people that think "it'll be abused" or "rich people will be able to buy lots of kicks" let me tell you this; They can do exactly that now and for free which makes the situation worse, so what's your argument against it again? a failed one.

There really does need to be added, the benefits would be astounding:

1) This will enable everyone to play regardless of skill and drastically limit kick vote abuse.

2) It will drastically change the community for the better, people will stop crying so much in game for kicks because people will start validating requests for kicks (as it costs them) and they will start to have an interest in finding out what hackers really are and kick only those that are hacking, and sure you can argue that they may not kick hackers as it costs them but again they do that now when missions are wins - for example kicking the hacker costs them possibly winning the game so they refuse to kick. There will always be abuse but improving the situation is better than nothing, most arguments against this and other ideas are "all or nothing arguments" which are nothing more than a false dichotomy.

2) It would generate more money for the company as many will buy ZP to kick hackers as GP can be acquired easily but it is also so easy to spend it hence the need for ZP.

As for nucks kicking every BR - He can do this now for free, this is the type of abuser that should pay to abuse the kick vote if he so wishes - let him kick 9000 BR's a week for ever that's a lot of GP - He will stop eventually and that is the point to adding this.