Safe gameplay for Crossfire

WeedPound wrote: »

1.Remove the current kick system(QQ kids spawn chat for kick if they get killed or Ace gets kicked by 2nd in team to take his place ) Hakers are still in room while legit players get kicked
2.My ideea for a safe system is to let the HOST ROOM choose who to kick and who to let in game
Think about it !The host has the autority ,he kicks you for no reason you dont join him next time ... and after a while there will be less hosts in game more friends you make ,less QQ kids
and no one will 1 shot kill anymore without getting kicked .
3.To remember what host kicked you ... there should be a option like chat blocking to add him on a bad host list or something.
4.For FFA HM MM the same Host has the authority.

In time there will be only good hosts that knows what a haker look like in game and not listen to all QQ little kids that will cry everytime they get owned.
!!! I think its the only way at the moment for a safer gameplay!!!

another noob crying about the same.
1. If the kick system is removed then hackers have a ZERO chance of ever leaving.
2. If the host decides who to kick, then i also have 2 concerns.
2a.What if the host is the hacker
2b.What if the host THINKS someones legit hacks and kicks them
Overall fail examples and fail ideas.

WeedPound wrote: »

1.Remove the current kick system(QQ kids spawn chat for kick if they get killed or Ace gets kicked by 2nd in team to take his place ) Hakers are still in room while legit players get kicked
2.My ideea for a safe system is to let the HOST ROOM choose who to kick and who to let in game
Think about it !The host has the autority ,he kicks you for no reason you dont join him next time ... and after a while there will be less hosts in game more friends you make ,less QQ kids
and no one will 1 shot kill anymore without getting kicked .
3.To remember what host kicked you ... there should be a option like chat blocking to add him on a bad host list or something.
4.For FFA HM MM the same Host has the authority.

In time there will be only good hosts that knows what a haker look like in game and not listen to all QQ little kids that will cry everytime they get owned.
!!! I think its the only way at the moment for a safer gameplay!!!

You guys insist that the host could do better decision than vote. I disagree with it.

The vote system can not be removed, and the system was designed to kick hacker, I think it is better to remove some restrictions in there.

The reason why hacker can not being kicked is there is no encourage for doing this, or no punishment for not doing it. Give the player chance to review the replay before vote, and teach them how to find hackers. At the same, encourage to kick real hacker, punish those who reject to vote kick hacker, who use vote kick to kick legit players. The community will be a in right track. When organized, hackers will found they can hardly gain the fun in the game. They can choose hack more carefully to fake a good player, or just go to another game. In both case, the game play will feel much better.

While when you ask host to kick a hacker, then for 1 shot kill, if host is in the same team with hacker, how could he feel if it is one shot kill if he fall back to snipe, while hacker rush to front. Without his own judgement, how could he to kick a player. If he listen to the QQ, you should still expect a good player being kicked.

WeedPound wrote: »

U dont join him next time or ever again like i said in time you know who can host a game ....you know that you can trust him or not ... make friends !

How could you remember so many rooms?

GhostArch wrote: »

How could you remember so many rooms?

At least learn to read before you write a novel about nothing ok ? heres the answer that he gave you and you didnt even read :


3.To remember what host kicked you ... there should be a option like chat blocking to add him on a bad host list or something.

FragMedic wrote: »

stupid
____________

And ho are you sir ?


Your not funny or smart GTFO

mohabaza wrote: »

And ho are you sir ?


Your not funny or smart GTFO

to think this is a good idea you have to be a complete re.ta.rd
first of all
you have fcking 5 year olds playing the game they get on host you kill them
they will kick you

second you have
dumb FOBs that communicate in their own languages and you kill either of them and if one of them is host they will kick you.

this idea is only good one for a mature community and from what i can tell CF has a re.tar.ded immature community

+ re.ta.rds like you request ideas like this and then you fcking cry for them to be taken out of the game

You are a f**king joke for posting this thread while baring that avatar.

OT: Learn to deal with it. Hackers will come again everytime when hacks are patched, we need the vote kick system like this.

You have no idea what you're aiming for... Do you actually think it's going to be that easy!?
You have to be really stupid enough to trust any host to be smart enough to distinguish between hackers and non hackers. If hosts have that kind of power, and even if he knows that you're not hacking, but what if he does not like you and don't want you around in his room? Exactly...

If there's a huge population of "QQers", therefore there's a greater chance for any of those "QQers" to be the host of rooms.

When recent hack(s) gets patched, new hacks are yet to be exploited, because they'll always develop new bypasses, so, the vote kick system is pretty helpful.

Legit players won't be always kicked... so deal with it.

Your idea will not only be bad for the hackers, it'll be bad for legit players.
Here's a comparrison.

Current Vote Kick System:
real hackers: +0
legits: +0

Real hackers and legit players have an even amount of chance of getting kicked.

Your Idea:
real hackers: -1
legits: -1

Not all host are smart, they'll never use their brain and assume legit players are hackers.
Real hackers are definately kicked, and so are legit players.

WeedPound wrote: »

I have no ideea? well let me tell you something about the voting system
1.The voting system is totaly messed up ...95% of the votes ,the players press tab and if the kicked person has less deaths they press f11.
2.Three ore more mebers of a clan in the same room can easy get you kicked if one of them QQ the rest will follow and there goes the f11 spammers.
3. Ace is the reason many players kick ...they want to be Ace so will QQ until the ace is kicked .
I would go on but i think there is another thread for kicking reasons ....
My point here is the voting system is rly messed up... my whole game is in the hands of little QQ kids
And more annoying is that players vote randomly wich makes it a really good system ...i play half an hour in ...the 13th round i get kicked 2 sec before the game end ... yea totally !!!

You know, seriously dude, it should be obvious to you. You won't be kicked all the time. For me, it's a fifty fifty chance. Learn to deal with it, grab on to the moment, the chance, when you play legit and not being kicked.
If your idea comes true, this is what's going to happen:
You say your gameplay is within the hands of QQ kids right? That means majority of CF players are QQ kids. So... if majority of CF players are QQ kids, the rooms you'll be playing in are more likely to be in the hands of QQ kids... that means the host is most likely to be a QQ kid, with absolute power of kicking people out.

WeedPound wrote: »

Most of the times i get kicked took place in ghostmode and team deathmatch .
Search and destroy mode i play only in clan wars and clan matches because it requires teamwork so... alone i get kicked alot i cant make much exp, the money i use for exp + are waste.

Look, your idea MAY be a solution to only yourself... but it's a disaster for the majority of other legit players.

Explain to me why and how can you trust any host to be smart enough to distinguish between real hackers and legit players. Come on.

"The host kicks you for no reason, just don't join his room again."
Oh... there'll be lots of those kind of host, logiclessly assuming that you're a hacker, or just simply hates you... (if your idea comes true)

WeedPound wrote: »

Its easy ...the host is a QQ kid he thinks you're haker he kicks you ... dont join him next time
this way the noob hosters will be separated by the good hosters ,you can spread the word and let others know hes a noob or he can be trusted.
And more ... on forum players can make lists with them who not to join and who is fair !
Like i said it only takes time to be cleared out!

This way of kicking players cant be worst in any case then the actual one !

If your idea comes true:
You think it's going to be that easy to find a smart host?? Compare the number of players that are smart and can distinguish between hackers and legit players to the number of "noob and unskilled players" in this game, so there are more chances for the hosts of rooms being these "noob and unskillled players". Just like Russia's more likely to be hit by an astroid simply because it's the biggest piece of land. You've expressed "you got kicked 95% of the time" right?... That means majority of players are the QQers, noobs, unskilled ones.

WeedPound wrote: »

Well if you find it hard to trust someone you can host by yourself the others can QQ and leave or play with you ,in the end QQ will figure out maybe but maybe hes just skilled and there's no reason i have to QQ anymore and call him haker.

That would defeat the purpose of us joining other rooms, because we cannot trust the other room's host because they're more likely to be a QQer. That would drive us to create our own rooms, but who's going to join your room? QQers are not, they'll leave as soon as they see you player legit. There'll be very few other legit players, or players that can distinguish between hack and legit, joining your room, because they're busy doing the same thing as you.

Also, a reminder to you, we're outnumbered by non-english speakers, therefore it's hard convince them that you're not hacking, when they join your room, if you speak a different language than them.
Why trying to convince them with word, can't tell by themselves? No, most people almost never use their heads.

no this is no good. It would do some good, but it would do more bad than good. just keep things how they are.