CF is...
I just recently tried playing Combat Arms, a game that gaming company Nexon runs. Honestly, that game sucks. Crossfire is 10x way better. The only thing they probably have over CF is the graphics and the looks. Combat Arms gameplay is, just unbearable. 20 Bullets to one guy's chest DOES NO DAMAGE! So, if you guys have had a chance to play, what else does CF have an advantage over Combat Arms?
Comments
-
CA sux, More hackers than CF..
but imo AVA is better than CA, better graphs, NO BR'S, Almost Hack Free
I had a bad 1st experience with AVA. I got the standard expendable SR, SMG, and rifle that you get to start out with, and the only gun I could really do damage with was the SR. The SMG and rifle (MP5KRail and M4A1, respectively) were fully decked out, too, so I assumed that all rifles suck. However, I've heard that the M4A1 and MP5KRail aren't very good, so I may try AVA again some day.
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 954 CrossFire Announcements
- 945 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 602 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 705 CrossFire Support
- 52 Suggestion
- 116 Bugs
- 29 CrossFire Guides
- 166 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic