Reporting Time.

[GM]Saidin

I think ,take care first of hight rank players report they know better who is hak and who is pro and let on finish newbee report they think if u kill him u r haker

i know is hard but.... i send many reports with players who shoot us from the wall and is very easy to see they was hakers and this report was for to long time with no consequence...now if is hard to demonstrate take long time and if is easy take long time where is the difference?
,

ecu wrote: »

i know is hard but.... i send many reports with players who shoot us from the wall and is very easy to see they was hakers and this report was for to long time with no consequence...now if is hard to demonstrate take long time and if is easy take long time where is the difference?
,

There are a lot of reports sent in like saidin said, and thus it takes time. If you think about it, each report takes more than likely half an hour to watch, then another 10 to 20 mins to confirm and do the admin/ paper work. So lets say each report takes about 40mins to do (it could be longer. Then to get through the number of reports that are sent in would mean that the staff would have to work 24/7.

As you can see Saidin is given out more Mod status to people, so in time the report process will be quicker.

They have already developed a new report system which cuts the time to report and review the report in half.

I'm sure they are doing all they can

Most of the times it takes at least 25 mins to check it thoroughly, in my estimation :]

DSRoyal wrote: »

I agree, but there needs to be a different system in place which reviews the blatant hackers first. For example, 1 shotting is very easy to tell... I mean killed by uzi from across Egypt is not something that happens often... and glitching the boxs/walls etc...

I understand that walling and aimbot and others take time to actually conclude that the person is in fact hacking, but IMO there are way more 1 shoters / glitchers (boxs/walls), which can be banned without much discussion than there are wallers which take a lot of time to ban.

Agreed on the idea.
They need to develop some small piece of code to scan the replay.

1 shot kill can be easily and accurate detected, because the weapon used and damage created are easy to calculate.
Glitching in structure, falling under sea level, walking through wall can also be detected by the calculation.

In fact, aimbot and waller can also be efficiently detected with proper setting.
Most aimbot can do lots of kills in short time, they have a period of time to rotate fast to some angle they can not see in previous shot, and their choice of kill is not based on what they see, I guess the code kill the enemy in certain order, either the order to enter the game, or by name. That is why when you see an aimbotter's replay, you know he hacks because normal human being will aim the close target.

Most of the time, waller will aim at enemy before they run to the open place. If they choose camp and shoot the corner, it will very hard to detect, even the replay is reviewed by an experienced player, he can not tell that too, unless he fired before the victim really get out of hiding.

As I said, the piece of code and logic can be applied in the game in several stage, in near future, support team can use it to handle large amount of report. Then it can be integrated into game client, and be called whenever someone want to start a vote kick or plan to submit a replay. And it is an different method than x-trap. It can not prevent hacker, but it can detect hacker efficiently, so that have they banned or kick out of game.

less fake report

restrict the power for all new players to make report( they don t know difference to a haker and pro players) and u will have less fake reports to solve .i bet u have many reports from players who is in cf community less then a mount (noobs)