Rank Limited Channels?
Comments
-
If u actually look at the server list you will see u can only enter some off them if you are above a staff sergeant.
Having channels with this limitation would be pointless
and why is that?....
I like the servers, since people with higher ranks tend to hack less, since they worry about their account getting banned.
Certainly isn't useless like this guy is saying, +1. -
RedSplatter wrote: »What if every server had one or two channels that required you be above a certain rank?
They already have rank limited servers. But it is good to have a room level limitation on ranks.
There are always two kinds of problem with low rankers, they are more likely to hacking if they are good, or if they are not good at all that will make the game play painful. There is always some noob in your team to mess your defense line with improper smoke and flash.
Someone asked for the ping capped rooms. Why no one want ribbon limited room. Only those who has honorable soldier ribbon can enter the room. So the young kids will know what is most important ribbon of all. -
If u actually look at the server list you will see u can only enter some off them if you are above a staff sergeant.
Having channels with this limitation would be pointless
It would be a replacement for those servers, so everyone could play on their favorite server and crossfire wouldn't have to buy more servers close to all of their other ones... -
-
KingstarKB wrote: »and why is that?....
I like the servers, since people with higher ranks tend to hack less, since they worry about their account getting banned.
Certainly isn't useless like this guy is saying, +1.
It's a game, not life or death. This is how hackers think.
"Oh, my main got banned? Oh well, make a new account, come back to my main next week." -
KingstarKB wrote: »and why is that?....
I like the servers, since people with higher ranks tend to hack less, since they worry about their account getting banned.
Certainly isn't useless like this guy is saying, +1.
If you read what is said, i was pointing out that having ranked channels is pointless, not the servers. (Read on for why).RedSplatter wrote: »It would be a replacement for those servers, so everyone could play on their favorite server and crossfire wouldn't have to buy more servers close to all of their other ones...
This would save them having to buy extra servers, but it creates another problem:
Say 1 channel can hold 200 people (im not sure of the actual number) then one server holds 2000 people.
There are 3 servers that are rank limited that is 6000 people that they would have to fit into channels.
30 channels are needed to support this idea, so new servers would need to be bought anyway.
So it is pointless to have ranked channels
One more thing high ranks hack just as much as low ranks. It is just when a low rank pulls of a good shot etc you think hack. A high rank on te other hand you think, hmmmm nice shot.... he is good -
Indomezu_CF wrote: »It's a game, not life or death. This is how hackers think.
"Oh, my main got banned? Oh well, make a new account, come back to my main next week."
That's true that a lot of people think that way, but the higher their account is and the more items it has, the less likely they will be putting that in jeopardy.If you read what is said, i was pointing out that having ranked channels is pointless, not the servers. (Read on for why).
This would save them having to buy extra servers, but it creates another problem:
Say 1 channel can hold 200 people (im not sure of the actual number) then one server holds 2000 people.
There are 3 servers that are rank limited that is 6000 people that they would have to fit into channels.
30 channels are needed to support this idea, so new servers would need to be bought anyway.
So it is pointless to have ranked channels
One more thing high ranks hack just as much as low ranks. It is just when a low rank pulls of a good shot etc you think hack. A high rank on te other hand you think, hmmmm nice shot.... he is good
Assuming that one channel holds 200 people with all of the servers they could probably fit 2500-3000 people in all of those channels combined. And every time they added a new server to help with some people's ping that number would be incremented by 200 (assuming that's how many a channel can really hold, and yes I am aware that a new server isn't exactly an everyday occurrence).
And since people usually assume the worst about other people they usually tend to think they hack regardless of their rank.
Also they could add a server in which all of the channels have different rank requirements. -
-
Indomezu_CF wrote: »It's a game, not life or death. This is how hackers think.
"Oh, my main got banned? Oh well, make a new account, come back to my main next week."
And that's a week where other legit players can play without that hacker on his main.
Taking small steps is the key. -
2 things would be very nice.
1. Server, where you only can join if you have the required rank.
e.g.:
UK 6 (Master Sgt and higher only)
UK 7 (First Lieutenant and higher only)
UK Clan Server 2 (Second Lieutenant and higher only)
etc...
2. Server, where you only can join if you have the required ping.
e.g.:
Uk 8 (Ping < 100 Only)
UK 9 (Ping > 100 Only)
like my idea?
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 950 CrossFire Announcements
- 942 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 599 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 700 CrossFire Support
- 52 Suggestion
- 116 Bugs
- 28 CrossFire Guides
- 166 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic