100 person map

cyahoo123 · February 2011

i think no but i don t know

ikev1n · February 2011

This isn't allowed when you create a room, lul. CF is kinda buggy, in CS:S (CounterStrike:Source) i get in a 30vs30 room, the same fps in like a 5vs5 team. I have now 340~400 FPS in a 8vs8 match.

uaAzraeL · February 2011

No, just no. I thing this is impossible on cf engine.

kingofkill20 · February 2011

this was fantastic but i dont think that this can be

ffsrlly · February 2011

0-0

╔═══╗ ♪
║███║ crossfire
║ (●) ♫ - is my life
╚═══╝♪♪

321Marcel123 · February 2011

Das würde mega Laggen aber wäre auch richtig geil zum farmen wen man z.b. eine RPK-Gold oder Ggun hat

RoyZinken · February 2011

laggy laggy laggy....

xdzxasx · February 2011

oh my good 100?

alexdiscus · February 2011

LOL we will have 2 fps and 900 ping

DEADINFIRE · February 2011

Lol thats funny playing with ffa

HyperDaVinci · February 2011

First of all it's impossible with our engine
It would require a supercomputer to hold this server
Everyone would lag
It would become a hacker's paradise
Egypt with 100 people=chaos
GM 50v50=impossible
So you get a -100 from me

vfbmichel · February 2011

are u silly 100 person per map are too much

hamburger2 · February 2011

Look Warrock 32 players and a **** game

DJ_SeRgI0 · February 2011

claro que si.. si tu lo dices

Purificator · February 2011

and which map? They are too little for 100 pl

If you say 50 pl... but its too much.

DJ_SeRgI0 · February 2011

no mames jajaa

wreckiN · February 2011

Rofl, hell no. Even players that have a great pc would be FPS Laggy.

VET00 · February 2011

it cant be lol !!!

xHerox94 · February 2011

Its too laggy

but i would be nice if it work ^^

fAM0UzCF · February 2011

OMG please not its be laggy

XlXsniperXIX · February 2011

i will camp and hidding in this map to win xD

xDeToNaDoRx · April 2011

BIG lag

NoobsRuleMe · April 2011

I'd have 1 fps on that map

ImpureWorld · April 2011

I would love to see the QQ on that map.
Newb: he hek!
Random nub: who i kik!
Newb: i don no 2 many ppl
Guy that killed the newb: I have no idea who killed you either!

Or 1 nade 20 kills l0l.

MothaFr · April 2011

Really? Would take 20 minutes to scroll and find the name of the hack to put up for kick.

20+ idlers on your team sounds fun too.

Cf has hard enough time banning 1 hacker in a game. Good luck having them review a game with 10 hackers in it.

50 noobs throwing smoke. Wheres the enemy.

Other than that, sounds like a great idea. lol

ManInMotion · April 2011

100 man server?
Lag lag lag lag laaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaag.
Lots People lag at 8v8 so the majority of people in the room will be watching slideshow.
Plus a huge map would be needed.
Although I'd like to see a 12v12 game mode.

bldSAINT · April 2011

OnlineMunzta wrote: »

I would love to see the QQ on that map.
Newb: he hek!
Random nub: who i kik!
Newb: i don no 2 many ppl
Guy that killed the newb: I have no idea who killed you either!

Or 1 nade 20 kills l0l.

Pretty much. This mode would be a disastor...:(

xiFusiON · April 2011

more laag in cf :X

Respawn87 · April 2011

I would have to agree with most of what's already been said. On the CF engine, a 100 player game would not work. However, on Counterstrike Source, there are 60 player games, so it is possible to create such a thing without worrying about lag.

The real issues would be hackers, idlers, and QQ-ers.... not to mention that it would be almost impossible to chat in game. A 100 player game would certainly draw in around 20-40 hackers per round. Another 15-20 of the players would be idle for most of the game. And of course you would have 30 or so QQing about some bull crap. It's all in the ratio. We see it in small scale when we play 8v8, just scale it up and you have a disaster at 50v50.

ukitake77 · April 2011

100 ppl is way too many, itll be too laggy and screwed with the nades flying everywhere

100 person map

Comments

Categories