Replace a normally really empty server with an LT server.
Ok, I admit I am not an LT, but I reckon it would be beneficial for the LTs and higher, as it would save a lot of vote kicks and QQing in games for them.
Instead of making a new server however, Z8 should take a look at all the servers, then rename and rebrand one of them, to save money.
What do you guys reckon?
Instead of making a new server however, Z8 should take a look at all the servers, then rename and rebrand one of them, to save money.
What do you guys reckon?
Comments
-
KingDarkside wrote: »Idk, I've seen TONS of Lt and higher ranks qq and kick for no reason.
So have I.KingDarkside wrote: »I think it would still be a problem.
It wouldn't, instead of a LT server there should be a "Pro server" with Master sarg/LT rank requirement without any kick vote enabled.
This would fix 2 things:
Kick voting for those that want it fixed.
And it would clear the hackers out of other servers (according to some ppls logic as they seem to think "hackers flock to FFA because they can't get kicked"), well I guess they would flock to this server then, which is a good thing and something the idiots that see hackers everywhere should support.
Give us the hackers and you's get the QQ'ers and kick voters IDK -
UKDissident wrote: »So have I.
It wouldn't, instead of a LT server there should be a "Pro server" with Master sarg/LT rank requirement without any kick vote enabled.
This would fix 2 things:
Kick voting for those that want it fixed.
And it would clear the hackers out of other servers (according to some ppls logic as they seem to think "hackers flock to FFA because they can't get kicked"), well I guess they would flock to this server then, which is a good thing and something the idiots that see hackers everywhere should support.
Give us the hackers and you's get the QQ'ers and kick voters IDK
Yes, please give us the hackers. I enjoy fighting them. Better someone really hard even if they're cheating rather than a bunch of nubs all day. -
UKDissident wrote: »So have I.
It wouldn't, instead of a LT server there should be a "Pro server" with Master sarg/LT rank requirement without any kick vote enabled.
This would fix 2 things:
Kick voting for those that want it fixed.
And it would clear the hackers out of other servers (according to some ppls logic as they seem to think "hackers flock to FFA because they can't get kicked"), well I guess they would flock to this server then, which is a good thing and something the idiots that see hackers everywhere should support.
Give us the hackers and you's get the QQ'ers and kick voters IDK
yeah but then everyone would speed h4ck tbh lol. -
-
umaddORubadd wrote: »yeah but then everyone would speed h4ck tbh lol.
And so what? (even though I don't believe that to be the case).
If your worried about getting hacked on there would be kick vote in the other 99% of servers along with the QQ'ers and kick vote nubs to save you. -
UKDissident wrote: »It wouldn't, instead of a LT server there should be a "Pro server" with Master sarg/LT rank requirement without any kick vote enabled.
This would fix 2 things:
Kick voting for those that want it fixed.
And it would clear the hackers out of other servers (according to some ppls logic as they seem to think "hackers flock to FFA because they can't get kicked"), well I guess they would flock to this server then, which is a good thing and something the idiots that see hackers everywhere should support.
Give us the hackers and you's get the QQ'ers and kick voters IDK
People with that high of a rank normally won't hack
I say hackers's average rank is Trainee to staff Sargent....And I have only ever seen one hacker with a rank of master Sargent and up..And wow...Bought ZP and has high rank?? REPORTED FOR LULZ!!(Walking through walls and Not taking any damage from glitches...Like the bottom of the map in Black widow FFA)
-
Condottiero9 wrote: »Ok, I admit I am not an LT, but I reckon it would be beneficial for the LTs and higher, as it would save a lot of vote kicks and QQing in games for them.
Instead of making a new server however, Z8 should take a look at all the servers, then rename and rebrand one of them, to save money.
What do you guys reckon?
its a very good idea , it would save time for us because many times i have got kicked by noobies who QQ
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 950 CrossFire Announcements
- 942 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 599 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 700 CrossFire Support
- 52 Suggestion
- 116 Bugs
- 28 CrossFire Guides
- 166 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic