Armour ALLOWED yes or No ?

johhhhnie2 · February 2011

would be unfair

Ro_Zeratul · February 2011

for sure no i want a competition where all of us can be the same not some armor ppl with no skill

pesocu123 · February 2011

ok

Yes, just wouldn't want to pay for it.

pesocu123 · February 2011

ok

for sure no i want a competition where all of us can be the same not some armor ppl with no skill

Nr58 · February 2011

At wogl ?

No just no !

Kostik_ru · February 2011

no! BP on WOGL? fail ._.

AjkeN · February 2011

ROC_RuFuS wrote: »

On LAN yes,

But with pings, interp and lag that governs Crossfire so heavily... no... definatly not.

This wise man is right.

I think people tank enough already :P

Proooff · February 2011

im sure most of the Competetive side wouldnt like it in 5vs5. but coming into a pub you can do what ever really . you put the money on this game so you can do what you want withit

Virtualpro · February 2011

on esl and wogl not
but in puplic games you can play what you want

visioNN16 · February 2011

Bp and WOGL / ESL noooo then it will be hard fail oO

mikiiiiitooh · February 2011

Yes, just wouldn't want to pay for it.

AntiBR · February 2011

i say no to armour, too costy

HandsomeJ3oy · February 2011

yes, for everyone

MDXSTV · February 2011

CMDAce wrote: »

Plz post your idea and thoughts of Armour being used in WOGL.

i guess but if no one knew Armour doesn't work for bullets which people think it is used for.
it is like used for bomb reducer pretty much not bullet protector.

HandsomeJ3oy · February 2011

aznman123 wrote: »

i say no to armour, too costy

i hope it will be free or GP

zebbale1204 · February 2011

i think no, cause it's not fair for ppl who don't have armor.

153F1re · February 2011

MDXSTV wrote: »

i guess but if no one knew Armour doesn't work for bullets which people think it is used for.
it is like used for bomb reducer pretty much not bullet protector.

armours do block bullets, i've been able to withstand noobs spraying me because they can't even aim, what you smoking? and armor + lag/tank helps players out in a big way. Back to the topic, armour shouldn't be allowed. People in CS frown upon players who wear it, so do my friends when I buy one. Don't flame me for comparing the 2 games.

joezh · February 2011

i think it is yes

as long as it was for sale

TopGunZRicky · February 2011

yeah. 200 more to go. armourd help a bit and no armourd get kill in second.

J_ymee · February 2011

It would be fair to not have armour

s2s2s20x · February 2011

Yes, just wouldn't want to pay for it.

DarktouchXx · February 2011

Armour should not be allowed in WOGL, because it's noobish ^^

pistolpacker · February 2011

I think it should be allowed

keokeomoar · February 2011

ItZfoReaL wrote: »

I think he means the little advantage it gives could be the difference between a win or loss. It sounds a little soft, but it does take a couple more hits to drop an armor wearer than a player that doesnt wear armor.

exactly .

feo1234 · February 2011

xd

Yes, just wouldn't want to pay for it.

mstrouble · February 2011

lol no armor pls hehee

MAWZZ · February 2011

I hate people with head armor, I usually aim for the head so my kills are fast, but people with that helmet annoys me, because that always have the getter advantage on me.

Killed1004 · February 2011

It should be allowed, Thats the game;)

tommyBS · February 2011

jea why do you get?

ShimLe · February 2011

hmm i thing its unfair :P

Armour ALLOWED yes or No ?

Comments

Categories