Why don't we make a server just for LT or higher rank ?

LT SERVER WITH NO KICK VOTE = Few hackers and no/little QQ.

A real server.

UKDissident wrote: »

LT SERVER WITH NO KICK VOTE = Few hackers and no/little QQ.

A real server.

^Hypocrite who crys about QQing...

And no, there would stil be hackers, it wouldnt solve that problem, people would still use Kick vote.

to0l wrote: »

make it LT or maybe one rank lower AND Honorable Badge players only.
that would be epic.

"Honor" essentially means nothing in the game. Whether or not you're talking about the "honor" ribbon or the "Very good, good, bad, very bad honor" your being able to play in a server shouldn't depend upon it (unless z8 games revokes the "banned" status on those that have been wrongfully banned). Superb players have been banned before for essentially being too good and some players like me, just leave games without playing them all the way through (which leads to terrible honor).

It was a good idea though

+1

Personally I like this idea. Granted LT's can be noobs as well, but I have to admit higher ranks are less likely to use obvious hacks for fear of loosing their account.

SzSick wrote: »

- HigherRanks ?! rlly ? im a Capt im 15 and i dnt complain its the Lower Ranks that complain get ya facts straight

Everyone complains...regardless of rank. But like Prodiac said...the server might have less hackers because they'll be afraid to get banned and lose their high-ranked account + any other stuff they bought with real money.

The QQing sure as hell wouldn't decrease. The hacking...maybe. We still got some losers that dont give a fudge if they get banned or not.

UKDissident wrote: »

You seem to have a problem with me I think, and my main posts are about kick vote abuse and QQ noobs that cry in game for no reason and that seems to have got your back up and nose out of joint, why is that?

How is saying z8 should make a real server LT+ with no kick vote 'QQ'ing'? Your crying right now because you don't like the idea of not being able to cry and kick if that server was implemented, right?

You would hate that server right? You have a right to be a cry baby nooby but don't impose it, you have what 20 servers where you can kick, whine, moan stay there.

You don't know what your talking about, it's that simple sorry.

No Im not, I find it hilarious and I actually laughed for about 5 mins after reading this post.

And yes, you deliberatly went out of your way to bash on my comments, Im obviously going to respect your in the same manner.

"got your back up and nose out of joint" - Dont even understnad that, but definitly not American english.... If your implying that Im one of these noobs... well then you need to recheck who your talking to. I only kick hackers, and people that spray in GM.

Do you not understnad that the vote kick is not going to get taken out? Moreover, its a fall back plan for the obvious hackers. Obviously Im up for a no kick server, but only in the condition that if you leave, you get no penalty, cus I dont like it when I get shot throught the walls 3 seconds in the game from my spawn. Hackers wouldnt get kicked as long as they stayed logged in, meaning that in the end, they would go around messing everyones kd up.

Im saying that the LT server wouldnt solve the hacker problem and definitly wont solve the QQ problem. Plus, you wont be able to kick them, so there would be a constant spam of "HE HACS!!!"
or "OMG HACER!!!" all over the left bottom side of your screen.

Your whole argument is inbeded with fallacies. By stating that "I dont know what Im talking about" you only show that your unable to listne to the other side, and that your only argument is to consider theirs wrong and your right regardless of what they have to say. Your really smart I must add.

In summary, the LT server shouldnt have vote kcik IF, and ONLY IF you get no penalty for leaving, and the system of exp and gp is based of kills/headshots/streaks instead of staying in the whole game and ammount of bullets you put out your gun.

Which leads me back to the original question, if my attitude on the forums is legits shouldn't be kicked and kick voting needs fixing so people can play properly then what is your problem with that? If you play without whining for kicks or kicking people.

And facts are facts:

1) Kick voting does need fixing.
2) At the moment it serves no purpose esp in regard to improving the game, in fact it's damaging - That damaging it isn't worth having.

When hackers can complete games with ease and legits get kicked (even by the hackers) it doesn't work full stop even if you do kick an occasional person you think is hacking.

RawrJafrikan wrote: »

Im saying that the LT server wouldnt solve the hacker problem and definitly wont solve the QQ problem. Plus, you wont be able to kick them, so there would be a constant spam of "HE HACS!!!"
or "OMG HACER!!!" all over the left bottom side of your screen.

How many LT's do you see hacking: Answer that?

How many ranks below LT do you see hacking: Answer that?

How many hackers do you have to play with because they don't get kicked: Answer that?

How many hackers would you have to play with in a LT server that you couldn't kick: Answer that?

If your seriously trying to say that there are LT hackers everywhere just as much as trainess, corporals then you don't know what your talking about.

And QQ'ing in game is sweet and cute if they don't have the power to get you kicked, I love this sort of QQ, so let them. QQ isn't a problem in itself, QQ is only a problem when there is kick vote.

RawrJafrikan wrote: »

Your whole argument is inbeded with fallacies. By stating that "I dont know what Im talking about" you only show that your unable to listne to the other side, and that your only argument is to consider theirs wrong and your right regardless of what they have to say. Your really smart I must add.

I am right and your are wrong. Your generating fallacies then projecting them on to others.

This stuff is so simple a child could understand it, High ranked servers equals less new account hackers (trainess) then next rank, next rank, next rank, next rank etc

RawrJafrikan wrote: »

In summary, the LT server shouldnt have vote kcik IF, and ONLY IF you get no penalty for leaving, and the system of exp and gp is based of kills/headshots/streaks instead of staying in the whole game and ammount of bullets you put out your gun.

So one can RQ if they can't kick? I would support this in the other servers that are abound with hackers often, but in a server that has like a few hackers in it? no I would support a desertion for rage quits.

Then what's the point in adding more? we already have Delta, UK4 and US South 2.

Making a new server just a rank higher is pointless and nothing more than elitist if everything in this server is the same as the others but the only difference is the ranks are higher.

The current ranked servers are the noobiest of all servers, most kick happy and most cry happy.

Either way it's a good suggesting imo:

1) No kick, LT rank server = Less hackers, no kickers and probably very little QQ.

2) LT rank restricted server (with kick) = Less noobs in other servers.

vMiami wrote: »

If there's no kick in LT server, how can that possibly = less hackers? Wouldn't hackers go there more often since they can finish games without being kicked from the rooms?

Well as far as I can see it's not LT's aimbotting everyone, going under maps, 1 shot body killing etc in most games, it's low ranks. In fact I've see about 20 LT's+ hackers since I've been playing period.

All the hackers are lower ranks and generally are lower than LT, the rank restriction of LT alone on a server would take care of 99.9% of hackers that would of otherwise have played there making kick voting unneeded or more of an hindrance, as for the few hackers or other riff raff that is what support is for and it'll take them a while to get back once banned.

And with no kick voting it would indeed be a 'pro server' and not just another Delta.

The benefits of a new pro server would be amazing:

1) Less hackers.
2) A real pro server.
3) Little or no crying in games.
4) A solution for players to mass kick vote abuses or at least a getaway.

T4K3TH4T wrote: »

Those two will aways exist, no matter wich rank or wich servers...
it's just damm hard for some people to understand that QQ'ing will lead them to nothing

OFC #1 would as you can never stop people crying, but as for #2 a pro server with no kick vote would stop people kicking and may very well as a consequence limit crying.

And tbh who cares if players cry if they can't cry to get you kicked? QQers are are funny without power and then there is chat block if their annoying.

MizMargot wrote: »

Jus sayin' but there's a lot of BRs with scrub lights with them.. >_>"

In UK 4 and Delta (before UK servers) You got kiked because you have a scar lite or SPOP.

Now...you get kiked for QQ-ing without reason, SPOP, STAR, scrub, M12, SG552...

I think Hackers WILL get kiked.