Why don't you pro's...

Because we're not really pros. If you're even the slightest bit competent in GM you can expect to be kicked often. Secondly, there is no way to filter out good people from bad people. Rank doesn't mean anything because of alts, and kdr doesn't mean anything because of farmers. A simple server named 'pro' would only invite egotistical morons who think a positive kdr means you're pro. The closest thing we could get would be to have a server that is unnofficially dedicated to good players, and we already have that.

x_Faith wrote: »

A server with a restriction on the KDr would be cool :O

This might be a solution for the server. As someone said, rank won't work but the KDR restriction might. This could be a promising idea.

There is no such thing as pro. Unless it is TastyLime's aimbot. xD

Yet again I'd rather have a ping capped server before I had a KDR server
IMO it's a pointless idea

OhMyGodd wrote: »

Yet again I'd rather have a ping capped server before I had a KDR server
IMO it's a pointless idea

Good point. I totally agree with you. Playing w/o BR's would be heaven!

OhMyGodd wrote: »

Yet again I'd rather have a ping capped server before I had a KDR server
IMO it's a pointless idea

thats true i would prefare that before a kdr based one :P

wierd but eh then who knows you might be owned by all those pros O.O

OhMyGodd wrote: »

Yet again I'd rather have a ping capped server before I had a KDR server
IMO it's a pointless idea

+1 on ping capped servers.

I'd also like more liberty given to host regarding the match setup; such as restriction of certain weapons, SPOP/STAR etc. If that's even possible to make.

OhMyGodd wrote: »

This is mainly referred to as Echo 8, and was mainly based for scrims not pubs not to mention it's quite empty at night for us West Coast players another suggestion please

Agreed. +1

How bout a sever for 2nd luetenants and up.

SGIsundir wrote: »

Hey I was wondering why don't all you pro's out there for who the game is to easy and you constantly get kicked ask for a pro server this way it won't be so easy for you and you won't get kicked cause your all pro's.....

Yea it's been suggested a few times.

IMO it should be 2nd LT up without kick voting enabled.

'2nd LT up' to stop the majority of the hackers and 'no kick voting' to ensure it's for decent players only, this way decent players will play there because they can't get kicked and the noobs will soon scatter because they cant win/cant kick/QQ'ing is pointless..

Sulfin wrote: »

Because we're not really pros. If you're even the slightest bit competent in GM you can expect to be kicked often.

I agree "pro" isn't the correct term because basically if you can play average/decent they'll still kick you.

The closest thing we could get would be to have a server that is unnofficially dedicated to good players, and we already have that.

The reason why there is no "pro" server at present is because all the ranked noobs go to Delta/UK4 and kick "all the hackers" aka decent players.

There won't be a pro server until there is a server without kick voting, then it'll be just you and your skill, instead of you + kick voting + QQ'ing for kicks which is exactly like the other restricted servers now, and that's why even those servers are not "pro" nor could you even say they are for decent'ish players.

krtica wrote: »

I'd also like more liberty given to host regarding the match setup; such as restriction of certain weapons, SPOP/STAR etc. If that's even possible to make.

no just no

and plus if you block spops you wont have an excuse to die like all the wannabe pros need excuses to die :P

clar1ty wrote: »

What will be the criteria for the server?

Fair Play:p

That would cause alot of farmers though.

Btw, I +1 the ping capped server idea