Will we be getting the ability to use signatures anytime soon?
Comments
-
No. Saidin said like a month ago that the community is too immature to get the rights back for it.
Here's
http://forum.z8games.com/showthread.php?p=1299665&highlight=signatures#post1299665
some
http://forum.z8games.com/showthread.php?p=1318340&highlight=signatures#post1318340
examples
http://forum.z8games.com/showthread.php?p=1581839&highlight=signatures#post1581839 -
No. Saidin said like a month ago that the community is too immature to get the rights back for it.
I would say that the rights for a signature should be given at around 500 posts. Without troll posts being counted. That way all of the decently mature forumers would be able to earn this right. And if something was innapropriate>Rights taken away+Infraction. -
No. Saidin said like a month ago that the community is too immature to get the rights back for it.
Here's
http://forum.z8games.com/showthread.php?p=1299665&highlight=signatures#post1299665
some
http://forum.z8games.com/showthread.php?p=1318340&highlight=signatures#post1318340
examples
http://forum.z8games.com/showthread.php?p=1581839&highlight=signatures#post1581839
Ik about those from awhile ago as I was on the threads myself. Still although he made a promise & not all people should suffer cause he believes a select few are "immature"... -
MrEdgarPro wrote: »I would say that the rights for a signature should be given at around 500 posts. Without troll posts being counted. That way all of the decently mature forumers would be able to earn this right. And if something was innapropriate>Rights taken away+Infraction.
Too bad there's so many post-farmers who are stupidly immature and make this idea a terrible one. -
Haha, suffer.
Damn, my post isn't getting enough attention, please let me add a huge image to it.
Signatures will be enabled when we have faith that the users can handle it.
Why don't you guys perma-ban those who abuse it?
We don't need sigs but its something nice. But after what happened, the threat (if you want to call it that) about removing avatars and stuff because Saidin got so FFFFUUUU, I doubt we'll get them.
Just bookmark the image and post it at the end of your posts for now
-
Less than 3 weeks ago is hardly "awhile ago".Ik about those from awhile ago as I was on the threads myself. Still although he made a promise & not all people should suffer cause he believes a select few are "immature"...
There's no reason for us users to get image signatures when people already abuse the features we do have. -
It would require monitoring we don't have the capacity for.L0LSmilyFace wrote: »Why don't you guys perma-ban those who abuse it?
We don't need sigs but its something nice. But after what happened, the threat (if you want to call it that) about removing avatars and stuff because Saidin got so FFFFUUUU, I doubt we'll get them.
Just bookmark the image and post it at the end of your posts for now
Do note that adding a 'fake' signature will earn you infractions.
They're not allowed for a reason, you're naturally not allowed to circumvent it. -
Haha, suffer.
Damn, my post isn't getting enough attention, please let me add a huge image to it.
Signatures will be enabled when we have faith that the users can handle it.It would require monitoring we don't have the capacity for.
Do note that adding a 'fake' signature will earn you infractions.
They're not allowed for a reason, you're naturally not allowed to circumvent it.
I will not lie. Most of the NEW community seems as if they can't even get an erection lol. (Excluding Girls ofc) -
It would require monitoring we don't have the capacity for.
Do note that adding a 'fake' signature will earn you infractions.
They're not allowed for a reason, you're naturally not allowed to circumvent it.
:O
I used to use one.
And could name a few peoples that still do. -
500 posts sounds about right.MrEdgarPro wrote: »I would say that the rights for a signature should be given at around 500 posts. Without troll posts being counted. That way all of the decently mature forumers would be able to earn this right. And if something was innapropriate>Rights taken away+Infraction.
Keeps the trolls without sigs, though post farmers would be a problem... -
No. Saidin said like a month ago that the community is too immature to get the rights back for it.
How do sigs have anything to do with the community's maturity, if Saidin said that then why dont just ban the use the avatar also. This is some bs. -
Immature community means you can't be trusted with non-regulated signatures, of course.ArmsMunzta wrote: »How do sigs have anything to do with the community's maturity, if Saidin said that then why dont just ban the use the avatar also. This is some bs.
I'm pretty sure he threatened with removal of avatars too, so yeah. -
Immature community means you can't be trusted with non-regulated signatures, of course.
I'm pretty sure he threatened with removal of avatars too, so yeah.Look how big the forum community is, I do see Dot's point. It only takes 100 people to put useless **** into their signatures like immature language, pictures. That's 100 more tasks for the mods to do.
Well its z8 fault to give foreigners the capabilities to access to this game, should we blame z8 or foreigners?? if less foreigners = atlease less tasks for mods.( a lot less) -
Right..ArmsMunzta wrote: »Well its z8 fault to give foreigners the capabilities to access to this game, should we blame z8 or foreigners?? if less foreigners = atlease less tasks for mods.( a lot less)
MODs work on the forums only.
The only people who give us trouble here are overcompensating teens. North Americans, to specify.
In-game, foreigners doesn't give me trouble. I'm a foreigner.
LAGGERS give me trouble, cheaters give me trouble. I have no idea where they're from, and I'm not going to follow some obviously standardized bias that all cheaters come from the same place.
Ridiculous. Racist. Uneducated. -
Right..
MODs work on the forums only.
The only people who give us trouble here are overcompensating teens. North Americans, LAWL! to specify.
In-game, foreigners doesn't give me trouble. I'm a foreigner.
LAGGERS give me trouble, cheaters give me trouble. I have no idea where they're from, and I'm not going to follow some obviously standardized bias that all cheaters come from the same place.
Ridiculous. Racist. Uneducated.
Q.F.T. Apart from Im not a foreigner to this game, I completely agree with this -
If the forum is to immature than you know we will never get this right!
Even in a couple of years! it will never happen....
All I can say now is give people with 500 post the right to have a sig and if the abuse the sig there rights will be taken away that simple but the GM's can't think for a sec to go like hmm ya we could have done that! but ohh no the need to act like #$!%#$! and ruin it for the "mature" peeps of this "forum"! -
SamuraiMoMo wrote: »If the forum is to immature than you know we will never get this right!
Even in a couple of years! it will never happen....
All I can say now is give people with 500 post the right to have a sig and if the abuse the sig there rights will be taken away that simple but the GM's can't think for a sec to go like hmm ya we could have done that! but ohh no the need to act like #$!%#$! and ruin it for the "mature" peeps of this "forum"!
People have barely any respect for the rules that we have now and do not sit there and say it is a small group who disrespects the rules. I'm not talking just avatar and signature rules either. I'm talking every day rules such as bypassing word filters, discussing closed topics, disrespect of other users, using fake signatures and inappropriate images. Need I go on? It isn't just "a few" people who break the rules. A LOT of people break the rules on a daily basis and it goes unnoticed most of the time because we as Moderators usually just delete the post or thread.
The majority of the community has given Saidin no reason to allow more privileges. Sorry to say, but the "mature" group that you speak of is not the majority. It's sad that we have a group that simply has no respect for rules. I'm sure many things would be different if it were the other way around, but it's not. Get your "Mature" group and take it into your own hands to help improve this community to where the MAJORITY of you can be trusted with a signature and maybe you will get your wish. -
[MOD]Polleus wrote: »People have barely any respect for the rules that we have now and do not sit there and say it is a small group who disrespects the rules. I'm not talking just avatar and signature rules either. I'm talking every day rules such as bypassing word filters, discussing closed topics, disrespect of other users, using fake signatures and inappropriate images. Need I go on? It isn't just "a few" people who break the rules. A LOT of people break the rules on a daily basis and it goes unnoticed most of the time because we as Moderators usually just delete the post or thread.
The majority of the community has given Saidin no reason to allow more privileges. Sorry to say, but the "mature" group that you speak of is not the majority. It's sad that we have a group that simply has no respect for rules. I'm sure many things would be different if it were the other way around, but it's not. Get your "Mature" group and take it into your own hands to help improve this community to where the MAJORITY of you can be trusted with a signature and maybe you will get your wish.
I agree. The post part tho, if the person needed over 2,000 posts to obtain a imaged signature for example. That's a smaller group to handle. Then you've got the others that will complain that they're not breaking rules and they should be able to obtain one too. It's a sticky situation, and just disabling them all together in my point of view is the best option for the community. -
[MOD]Polleus wrote: »People have barely any respect for the rules that we have now and do not sit there and say it is a small group who disrespects the rules. I'm not talking just avatar and signature rules either. I'm talking every day rules such as bypassing word filters, discussing closed topics, disrespect of other users, using fake signatures and inappropriate images. Need I go on? It isn't just "a few" people who break the rules. A LOT of people break the rules on a daily basis and it goes unnoticed most of the time because we as Moderators usually just delete the post or thread.
The majority of the community has given Saidin no reason to allow more privileges. Sorry to say, but the "mature" group that you speak of is not the majority. It's sad that we have a group that simply has no respect for rules. I'm sure many things would be different if it were the other way around, but it's not. Get your "Mature" group and take it into your own hands to help improve this community to where the MAJORITY of you can be trusted with a signature and maybe you will get your wish.
That is why I putted the word mature between " "
but anyway if you treat people like kids the will start to act like kids more and more and not mature.....
So if you give them the rights to have sig's at a post of 500 or more that shows your willing to trust them but if the still have the guts to break the rules in the sig a simple solution can be giving you take away the rights of letting that user have a sig!
You gave them that right but you can take it away that is what people don't want the wanna keep it so the will not try to break the sig rules! -
SamuraiMoMo wrote: »That is why I putted the word mature between " "
but anyway if you treat people like kids the will start to act like kids more and more and not mature.....
So if you give them the rights to have sig's at a post of 500 or more that shows your willing to trust them but if the still have the guts to break the rules in the sig a simple solution can be giving you take away the rights of letting that user have a sig!
You gave them that right but you can take it away that is what people don't want the wanna keep it so the will not try to break the sig rules!
I can think of plenty of people that are above 500 posts that aren't even close to being deserving of signature rights. We don't treat people like children, hence the straightforward answer. More than half this community ARE children, hence why they act like it, not because of us. It's not our fault that people can't follow rules. Act like adults and we will treat you like adults. I do agree there are some mature people in this community, but they are far and few between. Show them that the majority can act like an adult and then maybe they will treat you as such. -
[MOD]Polleus wrote: »I can think of plenty of people that are above 500 posts that aren't even close to being deserving of signature rights. We don't treat people like children, hence the straightforward answer. More than half this community ARE children, hence why they act like it, not because of us. It's not our fault that people can't follow rules. Act like adults and we will treat you like adults. I do agree there are some mature people in this community, but they are far and few between. Show them that the majority can act like an adult and then maybe they will treat you as such.
We all know that more than the half of this community is under 14, including me.
But the other thing we didn't get are the Forum GROUPS.
We have a couple like, [oL], fU, [in], Munzta's, Sir's and Tron's.
Why don't we get these?
Do you know anything about this, Polleus?
IF you tell me that I think you know everything it isn't that way. It's just that Saidin isn't online.
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 954 CrossFire Announcements
- 945 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 601 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 704 CrossFire Support
- 52 Suggestion
- 116 Bugs
- 29 CrossFire Guides
- 166 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic


