Failed Vote

1nsomniac · January 2011

So... can someone explain why 9-6 results in a failed vote?

That's kind of stopid -.-

If you ask me, even 9-7 should be approved.

UKDissident · January 2011

BrackObama wrote: »

So... can someone explain why 9-6 results in a failed vote?

That's kind of stopid -.-

If you ask me, even 9-7 should be approved.

I think it factors in noobs and idiots, as there are always some in the match and lots playing this game that f11 everything.

1nsomniac · January 2011

UKDissident wrote: »

I think it factors in noobs and idiots, as there are always some in the match and lots playing this game that f11 everything.

yeah, well i say either get rid of the kick vote altogether or have one that actually works >.>

since we're stuck with it, it might as well have 9-6 as a pass. i mean. 3-2 is a pass, so it's like wdf...

while we're at it, i wish the vote box were smaller. blocks my screen when i'm running-and-gunning. im more inclined to random-press a button just to get it out of the way...

CyberCatUK · January 2011

I think it's the same noobs that voted F11 to get our current government in power. No idea what they voted for, just saw F11 and hit that.

Aimoperative · January 2011

CyberCatUK wrote: »

I think it's the same noobs that voted F11 to get our current government in power. No idea what they voted for, just saw F11 and hit that.

LOL!

But anyway...

i think the kick vote system should be COMPLETELY democratic...by that i mean 9-8 guy gets kicked...

or some thing like that. >.>

UKDissident · January 2011

CyberCatUK wrote: »

I think it's the same noobs that voted F11 to get our current government in power. No idea what they voted for, just saw F11 and hit that.

Pretty much, but Labour was so terribly bad it wasn't surprising that the Cons got elected (well kind of).

Wouldn't vote for either, I like the Libertarian Party UK myself:p

CyberCatUK · January 2011

Actually come to think of it, I think the leaders of the party must have played crossfire and not been very good at it.

Now they have turned to kicking people of out jobs, kicking up the VAT and kicking the budget on everything.

Shall we make it all better? Naw, lets F11 and screw everyone up for a laugh.

nucksfan123 · January 2011

BrackObama wrote: »

yeah, well i say either get rid of the kick vote altogether or have one that actually works >.>

since we're stuck with it, it might as well have 9-6 as a pass. i mean. 3-2 is a pass, so it's like wdf...

while we're at it, i wish the vote box were smaller. blocks my screen when i'm running-and-gunning. im more inclined to random-press a button just to get it out of the way...

even 2-2 is a kick if the other guy dosnt vote.

just for the time being i would like the kick vote to have lower standards. just cause theres probly 1 hacker minimum per pub game. unbelivable right now

9George · January 2011

I think the votes depends of the team, if the hacker team votes f11 is more important than the person in opposite team.

UKDissident · January 2011

nucksfan123 wrote: »

just for the time being i would like the kick vote to have lower standards.

Yea, and after stricter like 13 to kick in a 8v8.

Are you "QQin" for the sake of it btw? or do you think it would be an improvement?:p;)

nucksfan123 · January 2011

UKDissident wrote: »

Yea, and after stricter like 13 to kick in a 8v8.

Are you "QQin" for the sake of it btw? or do you think it would be an improvement?:p;)

it would be an improvment untill the next hack patch. cause really theres a 1-1 ratio of hackers to rooms. minimum

H3adMunztaa · January 2011

4-3 is a pass, and 9-6 is a decline.

9-6 > 4-3

nuff said.

RawrJafrikan · January 2011

Herp Derp, Lets make it almost impossible to kick these Hackers!!!!

xXMizuXx · January 2011

BrackObama wrote: »

So... can someone explain why 9-6 results in a failed vote?

That's kind of stopid -.-

If you ask me, even 9-7 should be approved.

its odd crossfire math but i don't mind, its been saving my ass from being kicked by crying BRs a lot

IaKat · January 2011

H3adMunztaa wrote: »

4-3 is a pass, and 9-6 is a decline.

9-6 > 4-3

nuff said.

+1

As for changing it to completely democratic ex: 9-8 is kicked, then
do you know how many times people will be wrongfully kicked because of crybaby BRs and 12 year olds?

Phillybear · January 2011

H3adMunztaa wrote: »

4-3 is a pass, and 9-6 is a decline.

9-6 > 4-3

nuff said.

Go play in 5 8-player rooms and then in 5 16-player rooms, then tell me in which rooms you see most kick votes without proper reason (or most hackers).

xxxN3kRoxxx · January 2011

well..

16 ppl...

9 voted agree
8 voted disagree

9 + 8 = 17

1 dont vote... this little dude can decide...

9/9

or 10/8

thats why kik dont work in a situation like this... i guess... btw, u r right... it must be kiked... -.-

CyberCatUK · January 2011

How do you end up with 9/9 or 10/8 for a maximum of 16 people in a room and when only 15 can vote against 1 person?

Did you see that voting score in a room?

Bro_Jet · January 2011

BrackObama wrote: »

So... can someone explain why 9-6 results in a failed vote?

That's kind of stopid -.-

If you ask me, even 9-7 should be approved.

I love you man. cause its cf -_-

1nsomniac · January 2011

PRO_JET wrote: »

I love you man. cause its cf -_-

when were u a member of lpk?

miss you bro, haven't been in-game for weeks...

UKDissident · January 2011

nucksfan123 wrote: »

it would be an improvment untill the next hack patch. cause really theres a 1-1 ratio of hackers to rooms. minimum

But you can still kick right?, and it is the community that refuses to kick an hacker, kick vote is still 'working' as you claim.

Isn't it better to have a few hackers kicked than none at all? So why the QQ?

J_oogles · January 2011

tbh.. 9-7 should be a kick approve no higher.

Failed Vote

Comments

Categories