What does it take to nerf a gun?

What does it take? Just a nerf dart. Lol.

They just do it when they feel it is needed.

Phillybear wrote: »

SL/m12 aren't nerfed, so no, complaining is apparently not the (main) reason.

sl did indeed get nerfed ( it used to be acurate while moving...)





but back on topic, i have no idea whats needed for the nerf, i guess you just need to hope theirs enought peps complaining in the original version of cf for them to change it, and then wait a couple months for the patch to come to us...

Phillybear wrote: »

SL/m12 aren't nerfed, so no, complaining is apparently not the (main) reason.

They actually did nerf the M12, just there's not much difference than it was before.

masterdragoo wrote: »

in real life they dont go this gun is op lets try and make it worser to give who ever we are fighting a better chance the guns are all fine its just the people that are the problem. but i guess if they just get spamed with support stuff saying this gun is op they might change it

That's because gun's in Crossfire are unrealistic. Like take the M12 for example, a gun can't have that amazing Rate of fire and power and the thing hardly has any recoil. If this is a modern game the gun's should all be realistic as possible so that it's an even game.

They just do it to make people with moderately good guns who have never hacked or farmed or anything sad...They sometimes do that. I think they just say "Hey this is better than the cost we put on it, and we dont want to change the price so well nerf them"

You have to beat a GM 40-0 in a 1v1 with that gun.

but since GMs don't go on crossfire much there is little hope

Crystallyz wrote: »

That's because gun's in Crossfire are unrealistic. Like take the M12 for example, a gun can't have that amazing Rate of fire and power and the thing hardly has any recoil. If this is a modern game the gun's should all be realistic as possible so that it's an even game.

Winchester is an even better example. Three head-shots at very long range only equals about 7 hp worth of damage... cmon now.

0Mastema0 wrote: »

Winchester is an even better example. Three head-shots at very long range only equals about 7 hp worth of damage... cmon now.

IRL, a winchester can kill a fking bear at 180m away >.>
more than that it will hurt it badly, just won't kill instantly...
also, the m12s should shoot way slower than the other smg's, since it got an RoF of 550RPM, while the P90 got a RoF of 900RPM, also, the p90 weight less than the m12s ._.

BoLTzMunzta wrote: »

You have to beat a GM 40-0 in a 1v1 with that gun.

but since GMs don't go on crossfire much there is little hope

no there's no hope cuz they use kriss halloween
seriously u should see GotSol and I think Saidin was using m12s to get us mad still Hpx used AWP-camo

I'd Have to say, they do if they think it's not close to the way the gun is irl. Idk i have no idea. Im just assuming. Or Maybe if someone has a reasonable answer to why they should nerf it. But then theres the whole Scrub Light M12's story.

KryxisAlpha wrote: »

...guns aren't realistic in games compared to real life. Try holding the Deagle like the way in CF. It'll jam.

actually it wont the person in game is holding it correctly its very powerful and hard to use irl but its east to use in game

Crystallyz wrote: »

They actually did nerf the M12, just there's not much difference than it was before.

the nerf was changing the ranking that you can buy the gun at.

in real life the scar is a hella good gun, but most variants have only 20 shots per clip. they could nerf it like that maybe?

in real life the m12 is actually kind of a bad gun, it only shoots 9mm (pistol) bullets and the fire rate is sub-par to, say the mp5.
so the mp5 is better IN REAL LIFE


this is a game. if you can't handle noobs with the m12, well then too bad

very nice!!!

I remember when they did it to m4-c