The dominant weapon?

Ok so overall the dominant weapon is now snipers. Since quick scoping has came. Imo. It's just kinda lame now since snipers have the adv of a 1 shot gun which you can have 100% accuracy long/short range. Mid range is covered to? The only flaw is if there are 2 or more people, yet if you quick scope and pull out deagle. It's just.. Entirely unbeatable.
Rifles obviously have lot's of flaws. Some aren't good close range. Some have slow reload. Some aren't powerful. Snipers. Mostly awm and Dsr are used. 1 shot weapons.

Flame me all you want, but if you honestly look at it. Mw2. Cod4. M.A.T. (suba games). Quick scoping is just kinda unfair advantage. Then people are gonna say "why don't you use the unfair advantage?". Maybe because Me and snipers just don't work. Idk, but does anybody here agree with what I'm saying as to? Quick scoping? I mean it's gonna be a QQ supposedly, but I wonder. If a 1 shot weapon can go close/far/mid. Wouldn't it be unstoppable? I mean you have a deagle on the side. If you have good enough aim to quick scope I think you have a good enough aim to head shot someone with a deagle 20yards away. Not hard.

Quick scope another guy near deagle. Now you hear another guy pull out awm/dsr. Quick scope. Easy.
If you don't agree just don't say. "Stop crying. It's not over powered or unfair" Well tell me a reason. Maybe I can counter it. I doubt so. A gun that' can go far and close with 1 shot. Is kinda.. ehh.. What if you catch them on a reload? That's what a deagle is for? I mean if they have a deagle camo... and they can headshot really well.. just wow. your screwed practically.

No flaming/No calling me a cryer/ or a complainer. If you disagree tell me a flaw in it. I mean if you compare it to every section. They each have a flaw. With this. If you have a secondary weapon. There's not really a flaw.

Comments