This Game and It's players are sad.
I get sooo sick of people calling hack ... This isnt the cold war it's a game. Every time you get killed is not a hack. Learn how to spot a hack or read up on them dont just scream hack. This isn't or shouldn't be a mccarthian game where every good player has to fear being kicked for hacking? If every player on modern warfare or BFBC with a 74-15 or some crazy kd like that were kicked or banned for hacking the game would be empty. Just because you get headshoted doesnt mean its a hack. I was an Admin of Combat Arms for 2 years and I cant even explain the ammount of wild goose chases I was sent on ... Learn your hacks ... I.E. A spike isnt when a ping goes from 70-200 or 300 thats normal ... if the player was spiking it would go from 70-2000+ ... An aimbot is not someone who headshots you every kill ... an aimbot is a player that manipulates the code and switches their sensitivity to maximum ... they will spin and everyone near them dies. There is NO hack that allows you to play like normal ... it doesnt exist ... these "BR" players you guys so love to blame typicaly have extremely high sensitivity therefore they shoot you faster. Something has to change because honestly i'm going to go absolutely bonkers if I see another hack call on something trivial.
Comments
-
While aimbot accusations are rather sad since AFAIK the only aimbots in CrossFire require you to spin, wallhacks / chams are a different case. There is always a fine line between the good cheaters and the good players - gamesense and sound can appear to be a wallhack.
If you truly were a CA admin, I don't know why you'd be crying about this game. You would know what it's like in the F2P gaming community, and not compare it to paid games like MW & BFBC.
Funny how you say an aimbot "switches sensitivity to maximum". You sound like a mad, unintelligent randy. An aimbot scans the surroundings for the closest enemy, hence the spin.
The Brazilians who are called out absolutely cheat. They are actually spinning in circles, following players' movements through walls, and moving incredibly fast.
I used to play with 4 sensitivity, and I could still obtain 180 turns and kills. It's got nothing to do sensitivity. -
DasReichIII wrote: »I get sooo sick of people calling hack ... This isnt the cold war it's a game. Every time you get killed is not a hack. Learn how to spot a hack or read up on them dont just scream hack. This isn't or shouldn't be a mccarthian game where every good player has to fear being kicked for hacking? If every player on modern warfare or BFBC with a 74-15 or some crazy kd like that were kicked or banned for hacking the game would be empty. Just because you get headshoted doesnt mean its a hack. I was an Admin of Combat Arms for 2 years and I cant even explain the ammount of wild goose chases I was sent on ... Learn your hacks ... I.E. A spike isnt when a ping goes from 70-200 or 300 thats normal ... if the player was spiking it would go from 70-2000+ ... An aimbot is not someone who headshots you every kill ... an aimbot is a player that manipulates the code and switches their sensitivity to maximum ... they will spin and everyone near them dies. There is NO hack that allows you to play like normal ... it doesnt exist ... these "BR" players you guys so love to blame typicaly have extremely high sensitivity therefore they shoot you faster. Something has to change because honestly i'm going to go absolutely bonkers if I see another hack call on something trivial.
huge wall of nonsense. what is it about your username. nazi much? -
DasReichIII wrote: »This isnt the cold war it's a game.DasReichIII wrote: »Learn how to spot a hack or read up on them dont just scream hack.DasReichIII wrote: »This isn't or shouldn't be a mccarthian game where every good player has to fear being kicked for hacking?DasReichIII wrote: »I was an Admin of Combat Arms for 2 years...Learn your hacksDasReichIII wrote: ». I.E. A spike isnt when a ping goes from 70-200 or 300 thats normal ... if the player was spiking it would go from 70-2000+DasReichIII wrote: »An aimbot is not someone who headshots you every kill ... an aimbot is a player that manipulates the code and switches their sensitivity to maximum ... they will spin and everyone near them dies.DasReichIII wrote: »There is NO hack that allows you to play like normal ... it doesnt exist ...DasReichIII wrote: »these "BR" players you guys so love to blame typicaly have extremely high sensitivity therefore they shoot you faster.
Honestly, I **** more useful information.
edit:huge wall of nonsense. what is it about your username. nazi much?
Why bother quoting his entire post to mention briefly something a monkey could see. -
While aimbot accusations are rather sad since AFAIK the only aimbots in CrossFire require you to spin, wallhacks / chams are a different case. There is always a fine line between the good cheaters and the good players - gamesense and sound can appear to be a wallhack.
If you truly were a CA admin, I don't know why you'd be crying about this game. You would know what it's like in the F2P gaming community, and not compare it to paid games like MW & BFBC.
Funny how you say an aimbot "switches sensitivity to maximum". You sound like a mad, unintelligent randy. An aimbot scans the surroundings for the closest enemy, hence the spin.
The Brazilians who are called out absolutely cheat. They are actually spinning in circles, following players' movements through walls, and moving incredibly fast.
I used to play with 4 sensitivity, and I could still obtain 180 turns and kills. It's got nothing to do sensitivity.
If you could do a 180 with 4 Sensitivity you need a new mouse, or less mousepad space.
LOL -
-
-
-
Why bother quoting his entire post to mention briefly something a monkey could see.
with all due respect, i could ask you the same question. since you quoted everything in bits and pieces which is almost as annoying as the ****s post itself -
My mouse is a spastic bluetooth one that has a half faulty left click. I use the cardboard backing of an A3 visual diary as a mousepad.
-
with all due respect, i could ask you the same question. since you quoted everything in bits and pieces which is almost as annoying as the ****s post itself
Well lets see, I do so in cases to give context to the response its self in order to avoid confusion. Clearly it is not done for you since you have never posted anything with any content at all (regardless of if the content is good/bad, right/wrong). You simply have posted nothing at all. So it really does not apply to you at all, you are like a rock. Your just there, with no important thoughts of you own.
To be honest, I don't think you have posted a complete paragraph ever. It is probably quite difficult for you to do so. And no quoting my block of text does not count towards your paragraph. -
Well lets see, I do so in cases to give context to the response its self in order to avoid confusion. Clearly it is not done for you since you have never posted anything with any content at all (regardless of if the content is good/bad, right/wrong). You simply have posted nothing at all. So it really does not apply to you at all, you are like a rock. You're just there, with no important thoughts of you own.
There you go. -
CptFarukon2 wrote: »The squiggly red line under "bad" means that you spelled "Erect" wrong.hmm.. delete some of your PM's, I cant send one to you because you're a popular n00b with your inbox full.
-
well lets see, I do so in cases to give context to the response its self in order to avoid confusion. Clearly it is not done for you since you have never posted anything with any content at all (regardless of if the content is good/bad, right/wrong). You simply have posted nothing at all. So it really does not apply to you at all, you are like a rock. Your just there, with no important thoughts of you own.
to be honest, I don't think you have posted a complete paragraph ever. It is probably quite difficult for you to do so. And no quoting my block of text does not count towards your paragraph
sooo does that count? wow, see how much BS i wrote. i feel so precious for this community now. you should know i take this forum very seriously! also what others think of me so i will try to better myself in the future, sir. -
-
the biggest crap I've heard - patch eliminates cheaters
lol you know how ha.x works and how start ha.x?
you only need bypass antiha.cks program, client version does not have any meaning;
xtrap, gameguard, hackshield and probably any other program of this type have been broken long ago;
people that make up the bypass know what to do - new version bypass appears even in one hour after the update - this fight should be with them not with the players who benefit from this
Internet is subject to international laws - all h.acks websites, forums violate copyrights - we not destroy all ha.x manufacturers, but only they will be, and catching a handful of people will not be long
As I said, hacks do exist and will continue to exist. But there are some ways to at least reduce their quantity. And some of those ways have been applied in this patch.
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2K CrossFire
- 590 CrossFire Announcements
- 592 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 160 Community
- 12 Modes
- 280 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 38 CF Competitive Forum
- CFCL
- 14 Looking for a Team?
- 542 CrossFire Support
- 64 Suggestion
- 12 CrossFire Guides
- 33 CrossFire Off Topic