something wrong with hardscoping?

13»

Comments

  • there are so many flaws with that, and while to some extent its true, i expect at least partial realism, lone snipers rushing uncleared enemy bases is......barely pushing realism

    Go in the army and try to quick scope. If you can, I will personally gift you my whole savings account. To the OP, there's nothing wrong with hard scoping. I honestly like it in some situations. To snipe, just stop complaining. He won, he won. A win is a win is a win is a win. Whether you win by an inch or a mile, a win is a win. No matter how he did it, he beat you. I'm pretty sure all of the characters have the same hit boxes. That means if you shoot at one spot on the SWAT, it'll hit the same spot on different characters, including the SPOP and STAR. I'll try to say this nicely, but if you can't kill a SPOP, that's your problem, not his. Its a physiological thing. Some can hit it as well as the other characters, some can't. Stop complaining about the SPOP. Its just a stereotype now that everyone uses because they missed. Build a bridge and get the fuck over it.
  • why so many people agrue-ing in this stupid thread about nothing? 1v1 snipe who cares what one does as long as there's no hacks/glitching involved. If you're stupid enough to keep coming out the same way than obviously the hardscoper (never heard of this term in my life) will get you. BTW anytime there's a 1v1, SPOP/armor should be off unless both agree on using it or the other.
  • eX_ampLe wrote: »
    Go in the army and try to quick scope. If you can, I will personally gift you my whole savings account. To the OP, there's nothing wrong with hard scoping. I honestly like it in some situations. To snipe, just stop complaining. He won, he won. A win is a win is a win is a win. Whether you win by an inch or a mile, a win is a win. No matter how he did it, he beat you. I'm pretty sure all of the characters have the same hit boxes. That means if you shoot at one spot on the SWAT, it'll hit the same spot on different characters, including the SPOP and STAR. I'll try to say this nicely, but if you can't kill a SPOP, that's your problem, not his. Its a physiological thing. Some can hit it as well as the other characters, some can't. Stop complaining about the SPOP. Its just a stereotype now that everyone uses because they missed. Build a bridge and get the fuck over it.
    He lost, actually, good job of reading the thread through.
  • Theres nothing wrong with hardscoping, if for example on ship TD you're 1v1ing and you see a guy coming one direction, its perfectly fine to wait for him. You don't have to wait till he sees you to start aiming. Thats like saying in a scrim if you know where the last guy is at A and hes planting, to wait there mouse not hovering over him and waiting for him to see you before you start firing.
  • sn1peyou wrote: »

    And let these fine folks know what the second game was AFTER you took off your spop.


    i lol'd.
    m2s
  • I'm ROFL' ing at this thread. One guy thinks hard scoping is bad. Another thinks SPOP are cheap. Here let me let u guys in on a fact:

    SPOP/ GsG9/star/default character got the same hitboxes.
    But it's Their physical appearance which mentally affects were u aim.
    That being said.
    #2 Did you know that only 30% of snipers in cf know how to QcK scope properly.
    Most think they are but are doing mix of prescope+ dragscope and some times even hard scope.
    now that being said: I got respect for Justins side of this thread. It's a 1v1 sniping match , anything goes. Wether it's drag scope , hard scope, QcK scope, or even no scope.

    Btw Justin I'd love to teach u QcK scoping. Just pm me or request here.
    I am ROFL' ing at the OP and posters like you. sn1peyou presents no illegitimate arguments.

    Physical appearance is what matters, because you don't aim at invisible areas of the hitbox.

    Make up more statistics please. Quick scoping isn't even essential - if your drag/flick is only slightly slower, you can still regain that ground in reaction time or game sense.

    Sn1peyou wins on an even ground of character models. SPOP is thinner and would be more effective to "dodge" shots at long ranges. Justinin lies about quickscoping? cooL
  • TheLODD2 wrote: »
    Theres nothing wrong with hardscoping, if for example on ship TD you're 1v1ing and you see a guy coming one direction, its perfectly fine to wait for him. You don't have to wait till he sees you to start aiming. Thats like saying in a scrim if you know where the last guy is at A and hes planting, to wait there mouse not hovering over him and waiting for him to see you before you start firing.
    I never said there was, the OP is just some 13 year old kid who clearly thinks just because I said "hardscoping is lame" means I'm crying over him hard scoping, when clearly that's all I said. Because I do, think it's lame. That's my opinion, everybody is entitled to their own opinions.
  • sn1peyou wrote: »
    He lost, actually, good job of reading the thread through.

    You're just proving me right. He won the first time, WITH his SPOP. He lost the second time, WITHOUT his SPOP. That proves that he plays worse without a SPOP or that you just can't hit the SPOP. I did read the thread, thanks. By the way,
    We aren't fighting, I'm just merely stating that this kid thinks he's good when he can sit in a corner and wait for me to pop around while he's hard scoped with his SPOP. Then say he was quick scoping, yet he doesn't know what a QS is. It's just annoying.
  • eX_ampLe wrote: »
    You're just proving me right. He won the first time, WITH his SPOP. He lost the second time, WITHOUT his SPOP. That proves that he plays worse without a SPOP or that you just can't hit the SPOP. I did read the thread, thanks. By the way,
    And quoting me saying that we aren't fighting means what exactly? He depends on his SPOP, and yes, I have a problem with hitting them, as does the majority of people that play this game. Hence that it's banned from WOGL. Herp derp.
  • sn1peyou wrote: »
    And quoting me saying that we aren't fighting means what exactly? He depends on his SPOP, and yes, I have a problem with hitting them, as does the majority of people that play this game. Hence that it's banned from WOGL. Herp derp.

    No, what I was trying to get you to read wast he last part of the quote. It states you saying that the he was camping in a corner staying hard scoped. In your previous post, you stated that you said "hardscoping is lame." Why do you care if he depends on it? You lost, you lost. According to what I have seen, "good" people have no problem hitting the SPOP. Only the people who seem to miss cry about it. WOGL isn't God now are they? You cannot hang onto that. It is banned from WOGL because over half the people in WOGL cry about it. Just because WOGL banned it doesn't mean its bad. You say that as if WOGL is the most amazing thing in the world and what they say, goes.
  • St4yd0WN1 wrote: »
    Lawl, quickscoping copied from COD lawl.

    Saying lawl twice is lame. And it came from 1.6.
  • eX_ampLe wrote: »
    Saying lawl twice is lame. And it came from 1.6.
    I don't really care, I'm not the OP. I didn't make this thread, I'm just stating that I do not like hard scoping, and I find it lame. Whether someone wants to use an SPOP is up to them, the rules were no SPOPs to start with, and he clearly started with one. Refusing to take it off, I finished the match, and requested a RM without his SPOP, to my avail, I won, with rules that should've been enforced to begin with. Whether you call that "QQing" or not, I could really care less. As at the end of the day, it's just a game.
  • Who cares how someone clicks the mouse? Killing is the objective, if your not hacking or glitching, who cares how you do it?

    Yes. Doesn't matter how you snipe. And spop is as easy to kill as swat. Just the appearence tricks your mind.
  • Yes. Doesn't matter how you snipe. And spop is as easy to kill as swat. Just the appearence tricks your mind.

    maybe hes distracted by the spop booobies and cant aim straight xDD

    see what i did thar? xDD

    spop = doubledee hehe...
  • sn1peyou wrote: »
    I don't really care, I'm not the OP. I didn't make this thread, I'm just stating that I do not like hard scoping, and I find it lame. Whether someone wants to use an SPOP is up to them, the rules were no SPOPs to start with, and he clearly started with one. Refusing to take it off, I finished the match, and requested a RM without his SPOP, to my avail, I won, with rules that should've been enforced to begin with. Whether you call that "QQing" or not, I could really care less. As at the end of the day, it's just a game.

    Then please do not lead this to a 8 page thread telling us about how you think hard scoping is lame. That's your opinion.
  • eX_ampLe wrote: »
    Then please do not lead this to a 8 page thread telling us about how you think hard scoping is lame. That's your opinion.
    The forumers did that, via usual flaming.
    The deciding factor was the SPOP.
  • eX_ampLe wrote: »
    Then please do not lead this to a 8 page thread telling us about how you think hard scoping is lame. That's your opinion.
    I didn't lead this to an 8 page thread, smarts. I also cannot stop people from posting in this thread, like I said, I didn't make it. I also didn't direct others to post in this thread. So, if you would, tell me how I lead this thread to 8 pages, if you will.
    v1337 wrote: »
    maybe hes distracted by the spop booobies and cant aim straight xDD

    see what i did thar? xDD

    spop = doubledee hehe...
    You must be younger than the OP himself, or just more immature.