Search and Destroy: DSR-1 and AWM

I always use the DSR, my AWM is collecting dust. Since you don't generally need the x4 zoom, the maps are never big enough to really need it. The DSR's zoom is enough to be accurate even at the longest of ranges without the problem of the double scope.

Secondly, it being able to stay in scope is vital, as you don't get mulled over by a simple glock bullet from afar and then gunned down.

But as said, its preference, I've seen some pretty good sharpshooters for the awm. It depends on your style.

Feels like I can aim my no scopes better with an AWM because of the barrel.

AWM is soo much easier

Thought process:
- What is the purpose of a sniper in SnD?
+ To get a pick / picks.
- Which sniper is more suited for an individual frag?
+ AWM.

rDesigN wrote: »

-DSR
- + Long Range Sniping
- + Hazard Close range, cannot scope out fast enough to pull out Secondary
this is solved slightly by the fact that DSR no scopes better-
-AWM
- + Decent Long Range in 1 Scope, 2nd Scope can be easier for Precise Aiming
- + Flips fast enabling quick zoom out and quik-scoping and quick-switching...

AWM overall...carry a deagle with it. Anaconda if you can one shot...

Flaw about your second statement about the DSR not scoping out fast enough, this is fixed easily by the simple weapon switching like any sniper. If you are forced to unscope, your generally screwed anyways, sniping wise. Plus, I never found it all that slow, its just a 1-click zoom after all.

AWm because it faster. It's faster reloading even thought DSR looks like it reloads faster it's not. AWM is fast switching and DSR is just slow.

So inconclusion AWM is the best heap's of ppl use already just practice with that. DSR is made for campers and for camping in MM.

Definetely AWM.