macro spam >:[
Comments
-
MegaHurtz8K wrote: »im not even counting the BRs -_-"
and you make it sound like the people who said +1 are being prosecuted for saying we need a macro limit.
Well then I hope you exagerating, because without the BR's there arn't even a 10,000 people in this community. -
-
-
-
-
MegaHurtz8K wrote: »if i can't disprove it and you can't prove it then the point is null anyway.
<_<
try again...
Then were both spouting BS.
If we go back down to what we can prove.
2 out of 9 people who saw this thread immediately disaproved of it.
That means 78% of the people who saw this thread want it to happen.
Point proven now sir? -
BoredKitty wrote: »Then were both spouting BS.
If we go back down to what we can prove.
2 out of 9 people who saw this thread immediately disaproved of it.
That means 78% of the people who saw this thread want it to happen.
Point proven now sir?
i asked you if you could prove it, and you simply answered a question with a question, making you the one spouting BS.
11 people is NOWHERE near the scale of the community to even do a %.
your point is still null.
-
http://www.xfire.com/video/32a9e5/SIGGY!!! Just because of siggy, I say -1 to this idea. If it had to be implemented, there wouldn't be any Storm The Front sequels.
Who names their alt "ButtBandit" not me thats for sure:oL0LSmilyFace wrote: »Yeah not your account. You're not a h0mo and makes his ign buttbandit.
Sigma...LOL -
MegaHurtz8K wrote: »i asked you if you could prove it, and you simply answered a question with a question, making you the one spouting BS.
11 people is NOWHERE near the scale of the community to even do a %.
your point is still null.
It doesn't matter, Unless we go and poll the entire english speaking community, 11 people is the only thing we can rely on, and if we all consider them to be 11 random intelligent people looking at the thread, it seems like a legitimate thing to rely on. -
-
MegaHurtz8K wrote: »i asked you if you could prove it, and you simply answered a question with a question, making you the one spouting BS.
11 people is NOWHERE near the scale of the community to even do a %.
your point is still null.BoredKitty wrote: »It doesn't matter, Unless we go and poll the entire english speaking community, 11 people is the only thing we can rely on, and if we all consider them to be 11 random intelligent people looking at the thread, it seems like a legitimate thing to rely on.
*Grabs Popcorn* I hope I don't disturb you guys? Can I listen in? I won't be bad, I promise
*Eats popocorn watching ya* -
BoredKitty wrote: »It doesn't matter, Unless we go and poll the entire english speaking community, 11 people is the only thing we can rely on, and if we all consider them to be 11 random intelligent people looking at the thread, it seems like a legitimate thing to rely on.
Yes id does matter when you make statements and don't prove them.
you CAN'T relay on 11 people, if i took 3 people of the CF community (pretending the community was 9 people) and 2 of them agreed with allowing BRs to play, saying they can stand for a whole community of 9 people? NO! you can't!
Or do you disagree? -
*Gags popcorn* coughblasphemycoughMegaHurtz8K wrote: »Yes id does matter when you make statements and don't prove them.
you CAN'T relay on 11 people, if i took 3 people of the CF community (pretending the community was 9 people) and 2 of them agreed with allowing BRs to play, saying they can stand for a whole community of 9 people? NO! you can't!
Or do you disagree? -
MegaHurtz8K wrote: »Yes id does matter when you make statements and don't prove them.
you CAN'T relay on 11 people, if i took 3 people of the CF community (pretending the community was 9 people) and 2 of them agreed with allowing BRs to play, saying they can stand for a whole community of 9 people? NO! you can't!
Or do you disagree?
Your asking me to agree or disagree to something you just made up to say I was wrong.
On the other hand I, took something REAL, and that we can rely on at the moment.
Like I said unless you want to keep trolling, the only way we could prove anything was to poll the entire community. -
BoredKitty wrote: »Then were both spouting BS.
If we go back down to what we can prove.
2 out of 9 people who saw this thread immediately disaproved of it.
That means 78% of the people who saw this thread want it to happen.
Point proven now sir?BoredKitty wrote: »Your asking me to agree or disagree to something you just made up to say I was wrong.
On the other hand I, took something REAL, and that we can rely on at the moment.
Like I said unless you want to keep trolling, the only way we could prove anything was to poll the entire community.
you missed my point entirely,
on the other hand you just disproved your self. -
MegaHurtz8K wrote: »
you missed my point entirely,
on the other hand you just disproved your self.
I,ll just consider your point null.
And I didn't disprove myself.
The first statement was what I could prove at the moment, and about the thread.
The 2nd one is what we could "Fully" or "Completly" prove disregarding the thread.
But you can go ahead and twittle your thumbs over this pointless agrument.
I got better things to do.
-Kitty Out. -
BoredKitty wrote: »Ok heres the thing.
It doesn't matter what % of the community is having FPS issues, it should be that NO ONE is having FPS issues from the spamming.
And if the rest of the community seems to be having a problem, just because your not having doesn't mean you should just ignore it. If people are getting murdered in your neighborhood and your not, does that mean you should sit there and be happy?
The OP has a legitimate reason for posting, now stop trying to troll.BoredKitty wrote: »Proof enough?
And get better analogies please.BoredKitty wrote: »Its the community that is willing to step up to the problem right now.
The tens of thousands includes the idiotic BR's that are spamming along with the other douch.es causing the problem.BoredKitty wrote: »Well then I hope you exagerating, because without the BR's there arn't even a 10,000 people in this community.BoredKitty wrote: »Disprove it.
Which I doubt you can.BoredKitty wrote: »Then were both spouting BS.
If we go back down to what we can prove.
2 out of 9 people who saw this thread immediately disaproved of it.
That means 78% of the people who saw this thread want it to happen.
Point proven now sir?BoredKitty wrote: »It doesn't matter, Unless we go and poll the entire english speaking community, 11 people is the only thing we can rely on, and if we all consider them to be 11 random intelligent people looking at the thread, it seems like a legitimate thing to rely on.BoredKitty wrote: »Your asking me to agree or disagree to something you just made up to say I was wrong.
On the other hand I, took something REAL, and that we can rely on at the moment.
Like I said unless you want to keep trolling, the only way we could prove anything was to poll the entire community.
your just trying to cover you @$$, now everything you've said so far was to prove that the CF community wants a macro limit of sorts, but now your telling me you were proving that whole argument was pointless in the first place as we could prove and disprove the argument completely when you were clearly trying to prove that everyone wants a macro limit of sorts?
man your just really contradicting yourself, saying that i am wrong and also saying that it can't be proved nor disproved, completely ignoring any statements i have said that rendered anything you have said null, and the fact that you haven't disproved anything i have said?
-
*clap clap* Whoa Oo ... It was so good that even I didn't got it completely Oo ... *Popcorn eating*MegaHurtz8K wrote: »
your just trying to cover you @$$, now everything you've said so far was to prove that the CF community wants a macro limit of sorts, but now your telling me you were proving that whole argument was pointless in the first place as we could prove and disprove the argument completely when you were clearly trying to prove that everyone wants a macro limit of sorts?
man your just really contradicting yourself, saying that i am wrong and also saying that it can't be proved nor disproved, completely ignoring any statements i have said that rendered anything you have said null, and the fact that you haven't disproved anything i have said? -
I hate macrooooooos !!! Nuuuuuuf said!:mad:Why would you need macro?
For nothing else than easy spamming...
This is as useless as a m12. Both should be removed from the game.
+1
Hey look, 2 out of 13 now.MegaHurtz8K wrote: »
man your just really contradicting yourself, saying that i am wrong and also saying that it can't be proved nor disproved, completely ignoring any statements i have said that rendered anything you have said null, and the fact that you haven't disproved anything i have said?
I never said your wrong, I said your one of the few who disagrees, and I'm saying that a fully legitimate way to get what YOU want, is to poll the entire community,And I'm not ignoring anything YOU say, or I wouldn't respond to it, and I havn't really been trying to Disprove anything you said, nor that you could disprove what I'm saying, but just looking at the responses to this thread, it seems the idea of supporting it has more people then those or don't fully support it. -
the macro question was:
-Block the users who abuse it (like BR's spamming their clan name and some sheit)
-The chat blocking option is really, really unhandy, since you have to open the menu, open a list with all the players and searc for the idiot who's spamming in the middle of a raging battle with BR's shooting their m12s!
-Since i'm too busy to open the menu and block the idiot, i was asking for an easy[u/] way to take care of'em, and, the other spams, since they're forbidden in our comunity, (as much as trolling, you guys know?)
-Sooo, easy to implemente, will prevent some headaches from spammers and trollers, will prevent some idiots going "F11F11F11F11F11F11F11" all the way long in a friggin game, and it sucks some of my fps, and also can make me lag if they're too many macros being spammed at the same time.
-Don't be meany with a good idea, proven useful to the comunity, so, thanks for reading, and bb -
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 954 CrossFire Announcements
- 945 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 601 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 705 CrossFire Support
- 52 Suggestion
- 116 Bugs
- 29 CrossFire Guides
- 166 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic