Think before you kick
Lets face it. We all have seen ppl ragekick in Crossfire, especially in Ghost Mode. But there are certain things that you have to look out for before you rage kick the person that you think is a hacker. first of all, look at their k/d, this is their k/d in the game, not the one that you would see in the lobby. if their k/d is somewhere around 27/1, and they happen to be the ACE, then you might wanna consider kicking them. But if their k/d is like 7/4 or something like that, use your common sence and dont kick them, especially if someone on their team has more kills than them. Second of all, dont get mad just because he keeps getting lucky shots on you and other players. thats why its called 'ragekick'. because people get really p!ssed off at them because they always get killled by that person. Third of all, if you see him going after ghosts with his knife, or getting kill after kill after kill, headshot after headshot after headshot, thats pretty much the only time to kick them. And Last of all... MOST/ALL HACKERS USE AIMBOTS! so if he keeps getting kills and not all of them are headshots, dont spam, " OMG HE HACKS, KICK HIM, JAJA, HACKER HACKER HACKER, WAA WAA WAAAA", becuse it makes ppl wanna kick you for being an annoying fcker. So use common sence and think before you kick. Thank you for your time.
Comments
-
"A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can create a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look ****ing dumb and weird. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the ****? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the ****? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are ****ed off. You must get a proper *****-slapping to stop making walls of text, but if you are weird then that doesn't apply to you. Walls of text are defeated by deleting them or splitting them into paragraphs. Or some other things that would work but will take hours to think of. People are considered a nuisance if they create walls of text. This might be the end. If you hope this is the end, I am not sure. But if I was not sure then I wouldn't be talking. I should know. Or should I? The best way to make a better and good wall of text is to copy and paste what you previously typed or write. Hey, that reminds me. Walls of text aren't always on the internet! They could be anywhere that is able to produce symbols. D'oh. A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can created a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look ****ing dumb and weird and dumb. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the ****? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the ****? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are ****ed off. Now I just copied and pasted part of this huge wall of text, which is actually not. Wait what? Nice right? Ba boom a rhetorical question right there. Is this the end for the sanity of your eyes? What the **** did you actually read up to here? Or did you skip to near the end and read this? Either way, you fail in life. Just kidding. Or was I? Oh well. Congratualtions, or not, actually not. Get a life right now. I found a cheap life on eBay, but cheap lives are rare. Well, good luck in finding one. Not! Okay go kill yourself, but I wasn't meaning that. So go sit in the corner in your house. I do not care which, just stay there and rot. If you are not in a place with a corner, then lucky you. Find one if you can. There is no other option because I said so. Now if you pity yourself for reading this like most do, then do something productive and useful to the environment. My goodness.So SAD SO SADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!Walls of text often go on for how ever long a person is willing to read. Just about now, you should be getting fed up, or you have a "thing" and can't keep reading. go on, I understand. She's blond, isn't she. Thought so. Just, just, just leave, OK? make it easier on the both of us."Lets face it. We all have seen ppl ragekick in Crossfire, especially in Ghost Mode. But there are certain things that you have to look out for before you rage kick the person that you think is a hacker. first of all, look at their k/d, this is their k/d in the game, not the one that you would see in the lobby. if their k/d is somewhere around 27/1, and they happen to be the ACE, then you might wanna consider kicking them. But if their k/d is like 7/4 or something like that, use your common sence and dont kick them, especially if someone on their team has more kills than them. Second of all, dont get mad just because he keeps getting lucky shots on you and other players. thats why its called 'ragekick'. because people get really p!ssed off at them because they always get killled by that person. Third of all, if you see him going after ghosts with his knife, or getting kill after kill after kill, headshot after headshot after headshot, thats pretty much the only time to kick them. And Last of all... MOST/ALL HACKERS USE AIMBOTS! so if he keeps getting kills and not all of them are headshots, dont spam, " OMG HE HACKS, KICK HIM, JAJA, HACKER HACKER HACKER, WAA WAA WAAAA", becuse it makes ppl wanna kick you for being an annoying fcker. So use common sence and think before you kick. Thank you for your time.
Do I win? -
i hate the kicking system xD
i always complete my 40 kill ghost mode missions in 1 match of 13 rounds always
but unfortunally i sometimes get kicked after spending 10~15 minutes on it!
what i hate about the kicking system is its penalty...
it's like u never played that match!! no kills/deaths count, no exp, no gp!
i think the penalty should be removed, so if u ever get kicked, u didn't waste ur time. -
"A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can create a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look ****ing dumb and weird. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the ****? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the ****? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are ****ed off. You must get a proper *****-slapping to stop making walls of text, but if you are weird then that doesn't apply to you. Walls of text are defeated by deleting them or splitting them into paragraphs. Or some other things that would work but will take hours to think of. People are considered a nuisance if they create walls of text. This might be the end. If you hope this is the end, I am not sure. But if I was not sure then I wouldn't be talking. I should know. Or should I? The best way to make a better and good wall of text is to copy and paste what you previously typed or write. Hey, that reminds me. Walls of text aren't always on the internet! They could be anywhere that is able to produce symbols. D'oh. A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can created a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look ****ing dumb and weird and dumb. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the ****? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the ****? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are ****ed off. Now I just copied and pasted part of this huge wall of text, which is actually not. Wait what? Nice right? Ba boom a rhetorical question right there. Is this the end for the sanity of your eyes? What the **** did you actually read up to here? Or did you skip to near the end and read this? Either way, you fail in life. Just kidding. Or was I? Oh well. Congratualtions, or not, actually not. Get a life right now. I found a cheap life on eBay, but cheap lives are rare. Well, good luck in finding one. Not! Okay go kill yourself, but I wasn't meaning that. So go sit in the corner in your house. I do not care which, just stay there and rot. If you are not in a place with a corner, then lucky you. Find one if you can. There is no other option because I said so. Now if you pity yourself for reading this like most do, then do something productive and useful to the environment. My goodness.So SAD SO SADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!Walls of text often go on for how ever long a person is willing to read. Just about now, you should be getting fed up, or you have a "thing" and can't keep reading. go on, I understand. She's blond, isn't she. Thought so. Just, just, just leave, OK? make it easier on the both of us."
Do I win?
OMG GIANT WALL OF TEXT!!
and why did i jsut quote that -
This letter tells a story about power and politics and propaganda, about the tension between respectable, hardworking people and lascivious, ophidian publicity hounds like The Kick System. It is a story about The Kick System's efforts to substitute rumor and gossip for bona fide evidence. To get immediately to the point, if I had to choose the most scummy specimen from his welter of hideous gabble, it would have to be his claim that we can trust him not to bamboozle people into believing that Comstockism is a wonderful thing. Although the moral absolutist position is well represented by social and political activists and honestly influences legislators and policy makers, he has conceived the project of reigning over opinions and of conquering neither kingdoms nor provinces but the human mind. If this project succeeds then what I call garrulous, unsympathetic politicos will be free to overthrow democratic political systems. Even worse, it will be illegal for anyone to say anything about how The Kick System says that everyone with a different set of beliefs from his is going to get a one-way ticket to Hell. Yet he also wants to peonize and enslave his rivals. Am I the only one who sees the irony there? I ask because I am a law-and-order kind of person. I hate to see crimes go unpunished. That's why I indisputably hope that The Kick System serves a long prison term for his illegal attempts to con us into sawing off the very tree limbs upon which we're sitting.
The Kick System appears to have found a new tool to use to help him eroticize relations of dominance and subordination. That tool is careerism, and if you watch him wield it you'll decidedly see why blackguardism is dangerous. His rabid version of it is doubly so. The interesting point is this: He has the nerve to call those of us who teach jaded anthropophagi about tolerance and encourage others to do the same "conspiracy theorists". No, we're "conspiracy revealers" because we reveal that The Kick System hates you—yes, you, because you, like me, want to speak out against impetuous ****ants.
The Kick System wants us to emulate the White Queen from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, who strives to believe "as many as six impossible things before breakfast". Then again, even the White Queen would have trouble believing that you and I are morally inferior to homicidal sensualists. I prefer to believe things that my experience tells me are true, such as that I frequently talk about how it is a cardinal principle that my task—our task—is to resolve a number of lingering problems. I would drop the subject except that I will never give up. I will never stop trying. And I will use every avenue possible to give you some background information about The Kick System. By and large, The Kick System doesn't simply want people to believe that his apologues won't be used for political retribution. He wants this belief drummed into people's heads from birth. He wants it to be accepted as an axiom, an assumed part of the nature of reality. Only then will The Kick System truly be able to get away with showering harebrained disreputable-types with undeserved encomia.
Nice try to have more impact on Earth's biological, geological, and chemical systems during our lifetime and our children's than all preceding human generations had together, The Kick System. If you want a better opportunity to get a job, raise a family in a safe neighborhood, have a better chance at a good education, and lower the taxes on the money you earn, then I ask that you help me warn the public against those treacherous clodpolls whose positive accomplishments are always practically nil but whose conceit can scarcely be excelled. Some people suspect that The Kick System has been working under a veil of bureaucracy and secrecy to borrow money and spend it on programs that destroy that which is the envy of—and model for—the entire civilized world. Others assert that The Kick System's practices have no redeeming value. In the interest of clearing up the confusion I'll make the following observation: If you're like most people you just shrug your shoulders whenever you hear about The Kick System's latest obstreperous newsgroup postings. When your shoulders get tired of shrugging I hope you'll realize that The Kick System wants you to believe that he is a perpetual victim of injustice. You should be wary of such claims. Be aware! Be skeptical! Think! Do not be diverted, deceived, or mesmerized by The Kick System's socially inept opinions.
Are you beginning to get the picture here? The Kick System's shena****ns promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for The Kick System's lapdogs because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to The Kick System. It's time to step things up a notch and oppose him and all he stands for. Here, too, the exception proves the rule: He wants to leach integrity and honor from our souls. It gets better: He actually believes that war is peace, freedom is slavery, and ignorance is strength. I guess no one's ever told him that his faculty for deception is so far above anyone else's, it really must be considered different in kind as well as in degree.
Following this line of logic, it would appear that The Kick System spouts a lot of numbers whenever he wants to make a point. He then subjectively interprets those numbers to support his sermons while ignoring the fact that his smears represent a backward step of hundreds of years, a backward step into a chasm with no bottom save the endless darkness of death. He accuses me of being narrow-minded. Does he avouch I'm narrow-minded because I refuse to accept his claim that clever one-liners are a valid substitute for actual thinking? If so, then I guess I'm as narrow-minded as I could possibly be.
Once it becomes clear that The Kick System has fundamentally miscalculated how out-of-step he is with the average person's views, it becomes apparent that it's debatable whether the primary weapons of The Kick System's antisocial associates are lies and deception. However, no one can disagree that ugly swaggerers are more susceptible to his brainwashing tactics than are any other group. Like water, their minds take the form of whatever receptacle The Kick System puts them in. They then lose all recollection that one of The Kick System's hatchet men once said, "The Eleventh Commandment is, 'Thou shalt make a cause célèbre out of The Kick System's campaign to pass off all sorts of ridiculous and obviously lackadaisical stuff on others as a so-called "inner experience"'." Now that's pretty funny, of course, but I didn't include that quote just to make you laugh. I included it to convince you that he has produced a large number of improvident sentiments. I'm sorry that I can't give each of these the angry retort that it deserves, but I can say that if the people generally are relying on false information sown by the worst classes of cuckoo twaddlers there are, then correcting that situation becomes a priority for the defense of our nation.
I suggest that we name and shame The Kick System's legates for their laughable acts of imperialism. This right and truthful proposition, practically established, will help us launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of priggism. In particular, if The Kick System had his way, schools would teach students that "metanarratives" are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. This is not education but indoctrination. It prevents students from learning about how The Kick System's inattentive beliefs are intended to rot out the minds of all freedom-loving, free-thinking people. Once that's accomplished, he can replace such people with compliant, The Kick System-controlled, and, above all, obedient robots who would never think to work together in an atmosphere of friendship and hope. These automata will woo over intolerant vigilantes by using tactics such as scapegoating, reductionist and simplistic solutions, demagoguery, and a conspiracy theory of history any day now.
What we see today is a greater than normal manifestation of childish traits in The Kick System's zingers, but I won't linger on that. I am familiar with The Kick System's goals, I understand how he operates, I have long recognized his tactics, and I know just about where The Kick System now stands on the ladder to total power. I can therefore say that, certainly, I find it necessary, if I am to meet my reader on something like a common ground of understanding, to point out that totalitarianism doesn't work. So why does The Kick System cling to it? I once asked The Kick System that question—I am still waiting for an answer. In the meantime, let me point out that The Kick System has brainwashed a large number of people into believing that it is negligent to question his actions. Alas, we can't change people's minds overnight, and we can't instantly and totally dispel the delusions implanted by The Kick System's slaphappy lies, but we can put inexorable pressure on The Kick System to be a bit more careful about what he says and does. That might help a few brainwashees see that if we let The Kick System cause an increase in disease, separatism, crime, and vice, all we'll have to look forward to in the future is a public realm devoid of culture and a narrow and routinized professional life untouched by the highest creations of civilization.
The Kick System's dissertations have caused widespread social alienation, and from this alienation a thousand social pathologies have sprung. The Kick System's zealots are merely ciphers. The Kick System is the one who decides whether or not to deprive individuals of the right to rally good-hearted people to the side of our cause. The Kick System is the one who gives out the orders to threaten the common good. And The Kick System is the one trying to conceal how his desire to subvert existing lines of power and information is the chief sign that he's an obnoxious, unpleasant vagrant. (The second sign is that The Kick System feels obliged to subordinate all spheres of society to an ideological vision of organic community.) In short, The Kick System has never inscribed his name on the Parthenon of human excellence, either mental or moral. -
most hacks on the game now have the boxes hack of that hacking site and some are actully getting smart about keeping it looking legit O.OLets face it. We all have seen ppl ragekick in Crossfire, especially in Ghost Mode. But there are certain things that you have to look out for before you rage kick the person that you think is a hacker. first of all, look at their k/d, this is their k/d in the game, not the one that you would see in the lobby. if their k/d is somewhere around 27/1, and they happen to be the ACE, then you might wanna consider kicking them. But if their k/d is like 7/4 or something like that, use your common sence and dont kick them, especially if someone on their team has more kills than them. Second of all, dont get mad just because he keeps getting lucky shots on you and other players. thats why its called 'ragekick'. because people get really p!ssed off at them because they always get killled by that person. Third of all, if you see him going after ghosts with his knife, or getting kill after kill after kill, headshot after headshot after headshot, thats pretty much the only time to kick them. And Last of all... MOST/ALL HACKERS USE AIMBOTS! so if he keeps getting kills and not all of them are headshots, dont spam, " OMG HE HACKS, KICK HIM, JAJA, HACKER HACKER HACKER, WAA WAA WAAAA", becuse it makes ppl wanna kick you for being an annoying fcker. So use common sence and think before you kick. Thank you for your time. -
i hate the kicking system xD
i always complete my 40 kill ghost mode missions in 1 match of 13 rounds always
but unfortunally i sometimes get kicked after spending 10~15 minutes on it!
what i hate about the kicking system is its penalty...
it's like u never played that match!! no kills/deaths count, no exp, no gp!
i think the penalty should be removed, so if u ever get kicked, u didn't waste ur time.
lol, the whole kicking system should be removed, cuz people rarely kick for hacks, they kick for:
You played too good.
You played too bad.
You got Ace.
You didnt die. -
Here's an idea: look at the team's gm k/d before you enter the game. If it's above 2 and he's at a moderately high rank (maybe SFC or something) chances are he's not a hacker. But if you see someone with a negative k/d in any mode and in game he's 17/2, chances are he's a hacker. Also check the pings, most hackers have 150+.
AND FOR THE LOVE OF ALL THAT IS SACRED LOOK THROUGH HIS EYES BEFORE YOU REACH ANY CONCLUSION. If you see him look through walls, don't automatically assume he's a hacker. Breath can be heard through walls and he may be tracking that. However if you see him follow a single point through a wall without moving from side to side (pinpointing) he's probably a hacker. -
"A wall of text is BLAH BLAH BLAH
Do I win?
A wall of text is more or less, unformatted...(like his)
1) It's never against the rules...where ever you copy and pasted that must either be run by some dyslexic kid or some weed smoking sloth who can't be bothered with reading...
2) As long as it's informative, it's not a problem anyway...
I WILL agree that this thread is pointless...he's rPing (Rage Posting!
) because someone kicked him, after all... -
Lets face it. We all have seen ppl ragekick in Crossfire, especially in Ghost Mode. But there are certain things that you have to look out for before you rage kick the person that you think is a hacker. first of all, look at their k/d, this is their k/d in the game, not the one that you would see in the lobby. if their k/d is somewhere around 27/1, and they happen to be the ACE, then you might wanna consider kicking them. But if their k/d is like 7/4 or something like that, use your common sence and dont kick them, especially if someone on their team has more kills than them. Second of all, dont get mad just because he keeps getting lucky shots on you and other players. thats why its called 'ragekick'. because people get really p!ssed off at them because they always get killled by that person. Third of all, if you see him going after ghosts with his knife, or getting kill after kill after kill, headshot after headshot after headshot, thats pretty much the only time to kick them. And Last of all... MOST/ALL HACKERS USE AIMBOTS! so if he keeps getting kills and not all of them are headshots, dont spam, " OMG HE HACKS, KICK HIM, JAJA, HACKER HACKER HACKER, WAA WAA WAAAA", becuse it makes ppl wanna kick you for being an annoying fcker. So use common sence and think before you kick. Thank you for your time.
Just because someone has a score of 27/1 doesn't mean their hacking either....
Id rather have his teammates watch him for a couple rounds when they die if i think somethings up. I mostly play gm and as soon as someone calls me a hack some noob will kick me just like that without even watching me. -
They should remove the kick system entirely. It's never for people who are hac.king. Here's a better idea: remove the kick system, if someone is truly hacking, either play on because you're doing well already, or leave so that it won't negatively affect your K/D (screw honor).
-
According to Freud’s psychoanalytic theory of personality, the id is the personality component made up of unconscious psychic energy that works to satisfy basic urges, needs, and desires. The id operates based on the pleasure principle, which demands immediate gratification of needs.
ability to reason quickly and to think abstractly. This type of intelligence tends to decline during late adulthood.
he subject of intelligence covers a broad spectrum of phenomena and many theories or sub-theories from classical to modern times in pedagogy and psychology. In outlining the view of intelligence that runs through Vedantic thought, we need to distinguish it from the dominant ideas of intelligence in modern industrialised society. From the viewpoint of Vedanta, these ideas are based only on practical considerations, not at all on any fuller view of human life. The Western approach is foreshortened and presents a somewhat warped conception of the human psyche.
The most popular standard in psychology has long been the 'IQ' test (Binet's intelligence quotient test), which measures mostly mental or conceptual skills. This standard will be contrasted with intelligence as practical ability, as aesthetic sense, as theoretical intellect, as holistic synthesising ability, as a social skill and as human understanding. Further, and yet more important, is the concept of intelligence as the ability to know right from wrong, or moral discrimination.
Mental intelligence, as it becomes established in the growing mind, gradually comes to be informed by the 'intellect', which is the traditional name for the higher forms of intelligence (equivalent to the Vedic buddhi and Classical Greek nous). The meaning of intellect cannot be defined in clear, concrete terms because it is an 'inner' intuition. It is sometimes called the conscience, the power of ethical judgement or our faculty of moral discrimination.
A few years ago, a book called the "Bell Curve" was written about intelligence and it stirred up so much controversy that one of the authors went into hiding for fear of his safety. At its core, we can define intelligence as the capacity for goal-directed, adaptive behavior. This type of behavior is that which helps us achieve the goals we set and the challenges we face. If we are stuck in a very bad situation, those with a lot of intelligence should be more likely to find a solution or a way out of the bad situation than those without a lot of intelligence. In addition, intelligence is not just inborn, but increases with experience. Thus high intelligence is both innate and socially influenced.
Beliefs, assumptions, concepts, and information retrieved from memory form a mind-set or mental model that guides perception and processing of new information. The nature of the intelligence business forces us to deal with issues at an early stage when hard information is incomplete. If there were no gaps in the information on an issue or situation, and no ambiguity, it would not be an interesting intelligence problem. When information is lacking, analysts often have no choice but to lean heavily on prior beliefs and assumptions about how and why events normally transpire in a given country.
A mind-set is neither good nor bad. It is unavoidable. It is, in essence, a distillation of all that analysts think they know about a subject. It forms a lens through which they perceive the world, and once formed, it resists change.
By paying attention to their feelings of surprise when a particular fact does not fit their prior understanding, and then by highlighting rather than denying the novelty. Although surprise made them feel uncomfortable, it made them take the cause [of the surprise] seriously and inquire into it....Rather than deny, downplay, or ignore disconfirmation [of their prior view], successful senior managers often treat it as friendly and in a way cherish the discomfort surprise creates. As a result, these managers often perceive novel situations early on and in a frame of mind relatively undistorted by hidebound notions. -
According to Freud’s psychoanalytic theory of personality, the id is the personality component made up of unconscious psychic energy that works to satisfy basic urges, needs, and desires. The id operates based on the pleasure principle, which demands immediate gratification of needs.
ability to reason quickly and to think abstractly. This type of intelligence tends to decline during late adulthood.
he subject of intelligence covers a broad spectrum of phenomena and many theories or sub-theories from classical to modern times in pedagogy and psychology. In outlining the view of intelligence that runs through Vedantic thought, we need to distinguish it from the dominant ideas of intelligence in modern industrialised society. From the viewpoint of Vedanta, these ideas are based only on practical considerations, not at all on any fuller view of human life. The Western approach is foreshortened and presents a somewhat warped conception of the human psyche.
The most popular standard in psychology has long been the 'IQ' test (Binet's intelligence quotient test), which measures mostly mental or conceptual skills. This standard will be contrasted with intelligence as practical ability, as aesthetic sense, as theoretical intellect, as holistic synthesising ability, as a social skill and as human understanding. Further, and yet more important, is the concept of intelligence as the ability to know right from wrong, or moral discrimination.
Mental intelligence, as it becomes established in the growing mind, gradually comes to be informed by the 'intellect', which is the traditional name for the higher forms of intelligence (equivalent to the Vedic buddhi and Classical Greek nous). The meaning of intellect cannot be defined in clear, concrete terms because it is an 'inner' intuition. It is sometimes called the conscience, the power of ethical judgement or our faculty of moral discrimination.
A few years ago, a book called the "Bell Curve" was written about intelligence and it stirred up so much controversy that one of the authors went into hiding for fear of his safety. At its core, we can define intelligence as the capacity for goal-directed, adaptive behavior. This type of behavior is that which helps us achieve the goals we set and the challenges we face. If we are stuck in a very bad situation, those with a lot of intelligence should be more likely to find a solution or a way out of the bad situation than those without a lot of intelligence. In addition, intelligence is not just inborn, but increases with experience. Thus high intelligence is both innate and socially influenced.
Beliefs, assumptions, concepts, and information retrieved from memory form a mind-set or mental model that guides perception and processing of new information. The nature of the intelligence business forces us to deal with issues at an early stage when hard information is incomplete. If there were no gaps in the information on an issue or situation, and no ambiguity, it would not be an interesting intelligence problem. When information is lacking, analysts often have no choice but to lean heavily on prior beliefs and assumptions about how and why events normally transpire in a given country.
A mind-set is neither good nor bad. It is unavoidable. It is, in essence, a distillation of all that analysts think they know about a subject. It forms a lens through which they perceive the world, and once formed, it resists change.
By paying attention to their feelings of surprise when a particular fact does not fit their prior understanding, and then by highlighting rather than denying the novelty. Although surprise made them feel uncomfortable, it made them take the cause [of the surprise] seriously and inquire into it....Rather than deny, downplay, or ignore disconfirmation [of their prior view], successful senior managers often treat it as friendly and in a way cherish the discomfort surprise creates. As a result, these managers often perceive novel situations early on and in a frame of mind relatively undistorted by hidebound notions.
touch my body. -
"A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can create a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look ****ing dumb and weird. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the ****? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the ****? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are ****ed off. You must get a proper *****-slapping to stop making walls of text, but if you are weird then that doesn't apply to you. Walls of text are defeated by deleting them or splitting them into paragraphs. Or some other things that would work but will take hours to think of. People are considered a nuisance if they create walls of text. This might be the end. If you hope this is the end, I am not sure. But if I was not sure then I wouldn't be talking. I should know. Or should I? The best way to make a better and good wall of text is to copy and paste what you previously typed or write. Hey, that reminds me. Walls of text aren't always on the internet! They could be anywhere that is able to produce symbols. D'oh. A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can created a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look ****ing dumb and weird and dumb. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the ****? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the ****? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are ****ed off. Now I just copied and pasted part of this huge wall of text, which is actually not. Wait what? Nice right? Ba boom a rhetorical question right there. Is this the end for the sanity of your eyes? What the **** did you actually read up to here? Or did you skip to near the end and read this? Either way, you fail in life. Just kidding. Or was I? Oh well. Congratualtions, or not, actually not. Get a life right now. I found a cheap life on eBay, but cheap lives are rare. Well, good luck in finding one. Not! Okay go kill yourself, but I wasn't meaning that. So go sit in the corner in your house. I do not care which, just stay there and rot. If you are not in a place with a corner, then lucky you. Find one if you can. There is no other option because I said so. Now if you pity yourself for reading this like most do, then do something productive and useful to the environment. My goodness.So SAD SO SADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!Walls of text often go on for how ever long a person is willing to read. Just about now, you should be getting fed up, or you have a "thing" and can't keep reading. go on, I understand. She's blond, isn't she. Thought so. Just, just, just leave, OK? make it easier on the both of us."
Do I win?
damn.. very LONG wall of text makes my eyes hurt
on topic , i just F12 or if its someone thats annoying me , from spraying a M12s or scar -
"A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can create a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look ****ing dumb and weird. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the ****? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the ****? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are ****ed off. You must get a proper *****-slapping to stop making walls of text, but if you are weird then that doesn't apply to you. Walls of text are defeated by deleting them or splitting them into paragraphs. Or some other things that would work but will take hours to think of. People are considered a nuisance if they create walls of text. This might be the end. If you hope this is the end, I am not sure. But if I was not sure then I wouldn't be talking. I should know. Or should I? The best way to make a better and good wall of text is to copy and paste what you previously typed or write. Hey, that reminds me. Walls of text aren't always on the internet! They could be anywhere that is able to produce symbols. D'oh. A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can created a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look ****ing dumb and weird and dumb. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the ****? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the ****? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are ****ed off. Now I just copied and pasted part of this huge wall of text, which is actually not. Wait what? Nice right? Ba boom a rhetorical question right there. Is this the end for the sanity of your eyes? What the **** did you actually read up to here? Or did you skip to near the end and read this? Either way, you fail in life. Just kidding. Or was I? Oh well. Congratualtions, or not, actually not. Get a life right now. I found a cheap life on eBay, but cheap lives are rare. Well, good luck in finding one. Not! Okay go kill yourself, but I wasn't meaning that. So go sit in the corner in your house. I do not care which, just stay there and rot. If you are not in a place with a corner, then lucky you. Find one if you can. There is no other option because I said so. Now if you pity yourself for reading this like most do, then do something productive and useful to the environment. My goodness.So SAD SO SADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!Walls of text often go on for how ever long a person is willing to read. Just about now, you should be getting fed up, or you have a "thing" and can't keep reading. go on, I understand. She's blond, isn't she. Thought so. Just, just, just leave, OK? make it easier on the both of us."
Do I win?
I read the entire thing, I should go /wrist now. -
"A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can create a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look ****ing dumb and weird. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the ****? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the ****? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are ****ed off. You must get a proper *****-slapping to stop making walls of text, but if you are weird then that doesn't apply to you. Walls of text are defeated by deleting them or splitting them into paragraphs. Or some other things that would work but will take hours to think of. People are considered a nuisance if they create walls of text. This might be the end. If you hope this is the end, I am not sure. But if I was not sure then I wouldn't be talking. I should know. Or should I? The best way to make a better and good wall of text is to copy and paste what you previously typed or write. Hey, that reminds me. Walls of text aren't always on the internet! They could be anywhere that is able to produce symbols. D'oh. A wall of text is something that is frowned upon in most, actually virtually all Internet societies, including forums, chat boards, and Uncyclopedia. You should not make walls of text because it can get you banned anywhere unless it is a place that encourages walls of text. I highly doubt any place does support something so irritating and annoying, but anything can exist, but not really because unless you are in heaven then that can happen. But no one actually knows that was just a hypothesis, a lame one that is. Actually not really lame. You can created a wall of text supporting site, but you would be hated if you do that, so do not. But you can if you like, but I discourage that. Now on to the actual information of walls of texts. The wall of text was invented when the Internet was invented, but actually it was slow at that time. So whenever it became fast. But there would need to be some free or not free community for people, and that community would be able to have walls of text. But that community probably wouldn't have actually invented the wall of text. So basically, no one except God knows when or where or how the wall of text existed/was invented. Noobs probably invented, but probably not. Who knows. Walls of texts are usually filled with a lot of useless information and junk. Information and junk can be the same, but only if the information is junk or the junk is information. But who cares. The information/junk inside a wall of text are usually related to whatever the wall of text is located, but the best walls of text, which are actually the most irritating, most eye-bleeding ones, are completely random. Walls of text usually make the reader asplode or have their eyes bleed and fall out of their sockets. A number of people can stand it, but not read them. Actually some people can stand and read them. Those people do not have short attention spans. These are boring and patient people who have no life or have all the time in their hands, which are the same, but not really. The punishment of what making walls of text varies of the strictness of the community. But it doesn't really matter. Nobody cares. Walls of texts should be free of links, different font colors, strange characters, which are those other symbols used in society, and capital letters because it ruins the whole purpose of the infamy of walls of texts. It makes them look ****ing dumb and weird and dumb. Walls of texts are obviously free of huge spaces and outstanding things like capital letters. Of course, paragraphs should never be in a wall of text. Walls of text are known to create nausea, confusion, head explosion, and others. The others being something I can not think of either because I am lazy or if I do not feel like it or I can not actually think of anything. Like what the ****? That was a rhetorical question right there. What the ****? You are actually not requesting a satisfactory answer, you just say that because you try to be funny or you feel like it or if you are ****ed off. Now I just copied and pasted part of this huge wall of text, which is actually not. Wait what? Nice right? Ba boom a rhetorical question right there. Is this the end for the sanity of your eyes? What the **** did you actually read up to here? Or did you skip to near the end and read this? Either way, you fail in life. Just kidding. Or was I? Oh well. Congratualtions, or not, actually not. Get a life right now. I found a cheap life on eBay, but cheap lives are rare. Well, good luck in finding one. Not! Okay go kill yourself, but I wasn't meaning that. So go sit in the corner in your house. I do not care which, just stay there and rot. If you are not in a place with a corner, then lucky you. Find one if you can. There is no other option because I said so. Now if you pity yourself for reading this like most do, then do something productive and useful to the environment. My goodness.So SAD SO SADDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD!Walls of text often go on for how ever long a person is willing to read. Just about now, you should be getting fed up, or you have a "thing" and can't keep reading. go on, I understand. She's blond, isn't she. Thought so. Just, just, just leave, OK? make it easier on the both of us."
Do I win?
+1 +1 +1
______________________________
-Haley.♀
![]Rascal](https://z8games.akamaized.net/cfna/forum/customavatars/72/navatar_7594972.gif){kind=avatar}
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 951 CrossFire Announcements
- 942 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 600 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 703 CrossFire Support
- 52 Suggestion
- 116 Bugs
- 29 CrossFire Guides
- 166 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic