Is anaconda a bit inaccurate ?
I ve got both anaconda and deagle and i feel like its more difficult to to kill somebody at a long distance with the first. It s not supposed TO be like that cause at the item shop says that anaconda is more accurate than deagle.
What are you thinking?
What are you thinking?
Comments
-
No the anaconda is more accurate its damage just goes down at a rangeI ve got both anaconda and deagle and i feel like its more difficult to to kill somebody at a long distance with the first. It s not supposed TO be like that cause at the item shop says that anaconda is more accurate than deagle.
What are you thinking? -
I ve got both anaconda and deagle and i feel like its more difficult to to kill somebody at a long distance with the first. It s not supposed TO be like that cause at the item shop says that anaconda is more accurate than deagle.
What are you thinking?
The reason why people prefers deagle is because they use it for close range. All the snipers use AWM for mid,long range and eagle for close range. and many riflers use deagle for close ranges as well. Good thing about anaconda is that its much accurate once it comes to long range attack. -
No, you have it all wrong, the anaconda is horrible at long range, it loses power, anaconda is good for pretty much only medium range because of its high accuracy and slow fire rate, if you try to shoot someone at long range...say across the way of Egypt, with an anaconda you will need to use pretty much all your ammo in the mag, if you use the deagle at long range(same scenario)you can kill the person with one shot(headshot obviously)if you use the anaconda and you can aim well at medium range you will be able to hs everyone, with the deagle you will be able to kill people but its not as easy to hs. Over all the anaconda is the "pro" of the two in my opinion.IAmYourMom wrote: »The reason why people prefers deagle is because they use it for close range. All the snipers use AWM for mid,long range and eagle for close range. and many riflers use deagle for close ranges as well. Good thing about anaconda is that its much accurate once it comes to long range attack. -
No, you have it all wrong, the anaconda is horrible at long range, it loses power, anaconda is good for pretty much only medium range because of its high accuracy and slow fire rate, if you try to shoot someone at long range...say across the way of Egypt, with an anaconda you will need to use pretty much all your ammo in the mag, if you use the deagle at long range(same scenario)you can kill the person with one shot(headshot obviously)if you use the anaconda and you can aim well at medium range you will be able to hs everyone, with the deagle you will be able to kill people but its not as easy to hs. Over all the anaconda is the "pro" of the two in my opinion.
Thats what im trying to say and look what the others write. . . . -
Actually you got it all WRONG! People use anaconda instead of deagle is because anaconda is more difficult to kill in medium-long range, even in close range you need to aim very accurately , so using a cra.p gun means he is pro-., you get it?
people use cra.p guns or hard to use guns, like AK for extra long range or RPK for long range, and flame scarlighters in this game just to show that they are pro-, not the weapon insteadSo whats the point being more accurate and having low damage? It makes no sense -
I ve got both anaconda and deagle and i feel like its more difficult to to kill somebody at a long distance with the first. It s not supposed TO be like that cause at the item shop says that anaconda is more accurate than deagle.
What are you thinking?
The only shot thats inaccurate is the one you dont aim.If your c-hair is on the dome your ganna get a headshot.I trained myself to keep my c-hair at neck/head height.I get 85% HS every game just by bursting that area.And always remember no matter what that first shot will reg if you AIM!!!! -
Sexperience wrote: »The anaconda IS more accurate.
The problem might be, that your aim fails.
Are you spamming or something because you probably did not even read my thread. I did not say that i cant get kills but its more difficult to kill with anaconda than deagle. So stop saying this **** about my aiming skills .
Oh and something else
It isnt sure that you always buy the right gun. Dont try to make it seem better . Anaconda is a crap and yes i have it too . -
The only shot thats inaccurate is the one you dont aim.If your c-hair is on the dome your ganna get a headshot.I trained myself to keep my c-hair at neck/head height.I get 85% HS every game just by bursting that area.And always remember no matter what that first shot will reg if you AIM!!!!
You are wrong too. If its only my aim inaccurate and not the gun how do you explain the fact that nobody uses uzi to headshot at
long range ( as you say every gun is accurate and its about aim )
The answer is easy : every gun is not the same ,some of them are INACCURATE and if you havent noticed you must be very noob -
I own both of them. I feel like the Deagle is more versatile and is a better SECONDARY WEAPON than the Anaconda. Sure the Anaconda is more accurate and more "pro" as people say, but I wouldn't rely on it as a lifeline in the middle of a fire fight. By the time my AK47 runs out, I don't want to look for heads to aim at. Just show me a random body part and give me something to shoot with.
When you (OP) say that the Anaconda is a bit inaccurate for its stats, I probably wouldn't agree with you. It's ABSOLUTELY more accurate than the Deagle but it IS weaker past close range.
Those Deagle vs Anaconda videos on YouTube... Yeah, they're mine. I finally decided to come back to this game and check it out again. -
No, you have it all wrong, the anaconda is horrible at long range, it loses power, anaconda is good for pretty much only medium range because of its high accuracy and slow fire rate, if you try to shoot someone at long range...say across the way of Egypt, with an anaconda you will need to use pretty much all your ammo in the mag, if you use the deagle at long range(same scenario)you can kill the person with one shot(headshot obviously)if you use the anaconda and you can aim well at medium range you will be able to hs everyone, with the deagle you will be able to kill people but its not as easy to hs. Over all the anaconda is the "pro" of the two in my opinion.
any way
i got 2 dec and 2 anacondas for my 4 bags
and i prefer the deagle for all ranges -
Anaconda takes much more SKILL to use. I've used deagle in the past and i've recently switched to anaconda and i'm having much more difficult killing with it, both body and headshots wise.
First of all deagle has a much more fast rate of fire and less recoil.. and i don't care what it says in the gun profile the anaconde IS NOT more accurate than the deagle. Anyone who plays crossfire a bit can come to that conclusion easily.
It think the anaconda pays of mostly with looks and the fact that makes you fell like a cowboy lol So unless you're superskilled choose the deagle (much better pistol in every aspect, both power and accuracy) Besides looks the only thing thats in FACT better than the deagle is the reload (which is in deed more fast than the deagle) -
the Conda is if anything, a TINY bit more accurate. I'd just go with the Deagle.
other than that, the Anaconda has a better reload than the normal Desert Eagle, and it's draw speed is also a bit better than the Desert Eagle. but the DE-C out performs the Anaconda all the way, with it's fast reload, and 2+ bullets. -
No gun is as inaccurate as missing when you have the c-hair right on your target. While not fully long range, the OP M12S can often outgun riflers across Egypt (I burst at head).
Understand if you move, stability is down, and if you jump shoot, good luck with a Conda. Deagle may seem more accurate here because it has a higher RoF, you can spam and get lucky hits.
Conda loses range over distance. Is this horrible? Two scenarios:
1. Long range with no ammo in sniper / rifle. Now you can't Conda at that range, but it's long. You have time to reload your primary. If you're using a SMG, I'm not giving you tips, you lag up my gameplay.
2. Close range with sniper / no ammo close range with rifle. Use your Conda, poor range doesn't matter here.
Have a decent aim and AK's one-shotting is spectacular.hackbuster wrote: »random stuff in big font
Anaconda is an aiming gun, has advantage of no recoil - follow the head and click. Deagle's recoil could catch you out for kills sometimes.
It takes more skill, which is why you can't kill with it. Deagle is a spam weapon, requires next to no aiming.Folksingerr wrote: »Anaconda takes much more SKILL to use. I've used deagle in the past and i've recently switched to anaconda and i'm having much more difficult killing with it, both body and headshots wise.
First of all deagle has a much more fast rate of fire and less recoil.. and i don't care what it says in the gun profile the anaconde IS NOT more accurate than the deagle. Anyone who plays crossfire a bit can come to that conclusion easily...
Don't throw in terms you absolutely don't understand. Recoil is null on the Conda because it has a slow RoF. Deagle can't have less recoil than "none". Anaconda is more accurate, you just stated you don't have the skill to use it in the first paragraph. -
I 1-deag at least once a match when I use it, I even 1-shot with my 1911.
But the Ana I hardly ever 1-shot people with. I get the occasional headshot but I've had times where a headshot did 99 damage or something like that. I've never had a headshot with a Deagle or 1911 fail to kill the target unless it just fails to register entirely.
At everyone who says the Deagle is a sprayers gun and the Ana is an aimers gun, a Deagle was my second purchase in this game after a 1911. I would frequently not bring a rifle with, and play Monaco with only my Deagle. I would sit atop the banana side building and pop heads over the cars, and I would thread the needle through windows and counter-snipe with it.
I was hackused in nearly every room I played in, and when I got my AK I would do the same from farther away, I would counter-snipe across the map.
Now it is much more difficult as they severely nerfed the Deag's range-power and they lowered the accuracy, but it is still very possible and I frequently do pull off difficult "rifle range" kills.
I know how to aim, and just yesterday I lined up a double-goldenHS-1-Deag through a window in Fortress.
I have never, EVER, been able to easily kill a target beyond, say, 100 feet with an Anaconda. It's like trying to use a Winchester to snipe, it just doesn't work.
Many Ana users are highly skilled and can take on mulitple enemies, and I do succumb to the occasional Ana user, but the Deagle will always reign supreme.
Why? More ammo, higher ROF, more consistant accuracy (when moving, crouched, jumping, etc), more power (especially at range), more versatility, and less expense.
The Anaconda, much like the Glock and Uzi, is a novelty weapon. You buy it when you are bored and have GP to blow, just to change up the gameplay. As a serious weapon, the Deagle is the king of the pistols...
![[MOD]Zzxq](https://z8games.akamaized.net/cfna/forum/customavatars/20/navatar_5345120.gif){kind=avatar}
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 950 CrossFire Announcements
- 942 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 599 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 700 CrossFire Support
- 52 Suggestion
- 116 Bugs
- 28 CrossFire Guides
- 166 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic