Zomgz a hacker!
I saw a real life hacker on Alaska! Rofl.
I think I'm going to have to eat my words on this one. XD
Nelo1164 I think it was, he joined and cham/aimbotted through a couple rounds. Didn't get kicked surprisingly enough.
But they did try and he dropped for a second just to come back.
He comes in around round 5.
Here's a replay of it: http://www.mediafire.com/?z2jmyjtkwmz Already reported.
So uh... Suggestion... Patch the hacks lulz.
I think I'm going to have to eat my words on this one. XD
Nelo1164 I think it was, he joined and cham/aimbotted through a couple rounds. Didn't get kicked surprisingly enough.
But they did try and he dropped for a second just to come back.He comes in around round 5.
Here's a replay of it: http://www.mediafire.com/?z2jmyjtkwmz Already reported.
So uh... Suggestion... Patch the hacks lulz.
Comments
-
PurityNDeath wrote: »I saw a real life hacker on Alaska! Rofl.
I think I'm going to have to eat my words on this one. XD
Nelo1164 I think it was, he joined and cham/aimbotted through a couple rounds. Didn't get kicked surprisingly enough. But they did try and he dropped for a second just to come back.
He comes in around round 5.
Here's a replay of it: http://www.mediafire.com/?z2jmyjtkwmz Already reported.
So uh... Suggestion... Patch the hacks lulz.Ironic, isn't it? All this time you have been suggesting that Z8 removes the kick-vote system, because noobs kick legit players. And now YOU need it to kick a guy and you can't get the majority to bother voting.
-
LolliRoger wrote: »Ironic, isn't it? All this time you have been suggesting that Z8 removes the kick-vote system, because noobs kick legit players. And now YOU need it to kick a guy and you can't get the majority to bother voting.
Why is that ironic? -
LolliRoger wrote: »Because he expects it to work, but at the same time he's telling everyone that it needs to be removed because its flawed.
I figured since he said surprisingly enough, he meant that as another example as to why kick voting should be removed, therefore, making it not ironic.
But then again, I think too much. =( -
TheTainted wrote: »I figured since he said surprisingly enough, he meant that as another example as to why kick voting should be removed, therefore, making it not ironic.
But then again, I think too much. =(Legit players are getting kicked because noobs think they are hacking, yet these same noobs allow obvious hackers to remain in the game. To me that make very little sense.
-
TheTainted wrote: »I figured since he said surprisingly enough, he meant that as another example as to why kick voting should be removed, therefore, making it not ironic.
But then again, I think too much. =(
But your right.
I know for a fact hackers never get kiked at least in the games I'm in.
I have never seen a 1 shot kill hacker that kills everyone in 7 seconds voted off.LolliRoger wrote: »Legit players are getting kicked because noobs think they are hacking, yet these same noobs allow obvious hackers to remain in the game. To me that make very little sense.
It's because your using flawed logic, they are not the very same people but they are all noob.
A certain group of noobs may think having a hacker on their team is 'good' as they'll 'win', that's why true hackers don't get kicked in the cases mentioned, it also explains why people who are accused of hacking and complain here about being wrongfully kicked are only kicked 60% of the time instead of 100% of the time.
Different noobs, different agendas all generally idiots however. -
UKDissident wrote: »It's because your using flawed logic, they are not the very same people but they are all noob.
A certain group of noobs may think having a hacker on their team is 'good' as they'll 'win', that's why true hackers don't get kicked in the cases mentioned, it also explains why people who are accused of hacking and complain here about being wrongfully kicked are only kicked 60% of the time instead of 100% of the time.
Different noobs, different agendas all generally idiots however.You might think its flawed, but it isn't. You may think they are different noobs, but they aren't.
You know why? Because these noobs don't THINK legit players are hacking. They just accuse them of hacking and hope that they'll get kicked for it. But as soon as these same noobs encounter a REAL hacker, they all start whispering to the hacker, asking him how and where he got his hacks from and if he's willing to send it to them. This is how sad a large portion of our community is, and this is why good players get kicked, and hackers aren't.
-
LolliRoger wrote: »Legit players are getting kicked because noobs think they are hacking, yet these same noobs allow obvious hackers to remain in the game. To me that make very little sense.
LolliRoger wrote: »You might think its flawed, but it isn't. You may think they are different noobs, but they aren't.
You know why? Because these noobs don't THINK legit players are hacking. They just accuse them of hacking and hope that they'll get kicked for it. But as soon as these same noobs encounter a REAL hacker, they all start whispering to the hacker, asking him how and where he got his hacks from and if he's willing to send it to them. This is how sad a large portion of our community is, and this is why good players get kicked, and hackers aren't.
Then you answered your own question.
In your first quote you said it 'didn't make sense', therefore the position presented by Purity and others was ill founded and therefore you was ridiculing Purity's position (or those trying to tell you what Purity meant).
Then when it's explained further you basically say thats complete nonsense and basically 'I know what the problem is' (quote 2).
Why didn't you just say this from the start?
It's like you are aware that there is a huge problem but pretend there isn't to keep the status quo, but when someone beats it out of you, it's only then you admit it. -
Hahaha. I love it, I don't think a single person really read what I said. XD
For the 10 people that said report it: "Here's a replay of it: http://www.mediafire.com/?z2jmyjtkwmz Already reported."
And yes, when I said "Didn't get kicked surprisingly enough." It was a joke about me getting kicked all the time but a real hacker not getting kicked.
Also to Lolli: I never even tried to kick him, why? He was on my team and I never got to spec him while playing, only during the replay. The other team kept saying he was a hacker but I couldn't see that. Could have just been someone like me. Other people on my team tried to kick him and I said "If he's hacking, I will check and report the replay (which I did) but I don't know if he's hacking or not atm."
The Tainted is a little bit closer on. I still stand by my position the kick vote should be removed. If anything this is as much an example disproving your theory that "If you remove it then hackers will come." since they're already there if they want to be as much as it disproves my argument that hackers simply aren't there. Let him kill them all for 5 rounds without getting kicked, if it's fresh in their minds at the end more people will report him. I wonder if anyone from their team even did.
Like others said, kicking just moves them around. What we need are replays sent in to get them banned and better hack protection to be in effect. Why is it the players responsibility to patrol the game? Especially when they do it poorly. So like I said before, my suggestion here is to "Patch the hacks."
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- Off-Topic - Go To Game OT Forums
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 16 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 5.2K CrossFire
- 955 CrossFire Announcements
- 945 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 1.4K Community
- 122 Modes
- 602 Suggestions
- 85 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 274 CF Competitive Forum
- 19 CFCL
- 26 Looking for a Team?
- 705 CrossFire Support
- 52 Suggestion
- 116 Bugs
- 29 CrossFire Guides
- 166 Technical Issues
- 47 CrossFire Off Topic