Did you get goosebumps?

I want to kick her in the face.

IL1keDrenKip wrote: »

I want to kick her in the face.

your so mean Dren, that was me when i was 10.

Uhm, I've seen better.

She only relies on the "Cute" factor, her voice isn't amazing.

one will have to see how her voice will change, but most of those kids find theirselves with an average voice after puberty. other than that its a good performance for her age.
song is a pain in the ass though. i ve recently seen a girl (about 7 years of age) on youtube, playing satriani solos on the guitar. mindbending. forgot her name though.

IL1keDrenKip wrote: »

I want to kick her in the face.

ROFL DREN
like this??!?!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4M6nJunPcic

[mod]ladyshy wrote: »

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k-nd1faecay

i got duckbumps. S: What... An... Amazing... Little... Girl! Oh my god! Angel *.*

you didnt buy me zp so i still dont like you

MyAWP1 wrote: »

i see no talent in singing; sorry
i also find it pathetic how shows like Americas got Talent allow singing in the competition. There are enough out there including the famous of most... american idol lol

it's all nice and stuff if you have a beautiful voice and you can sing but it is not worth anything. that's why there are pirated songs

American idol is an insult, no good singer has ever come out, they want the most homosexual, lesbian, money leeching beast that shows up with the ugliest hair.

Syriixist wrote: »

American idol is an insult, no good singer has ever come out, they want the most homosexual, lesbian, money leeching beast that shows up with the ugliest hair.

its funny when some hillbilly comes on with buck teeth and sings well

syriixist wrote: »

i must agree, always funny.

britains got talent and americas got talent is better