Another sig

iPhoenixi wrote: »

I'm a very unsuccessful hypocritical troller, and I come from the underground, I'm bent on making the world a better world, with a very discrete method.

when I'm not high on cocaine I will go on rant-on message boards because I know I will never be as good as you guys so I must complain to make myself feel better.

=]

You might want to stay away from that. And stay on topic.

KillGod wrote: »

You might want to stay away from that. And stay on topic.

Why would I do that. He asked me who I was, Needed to answer the fellow.

iTzSmarties wrote: »

This is a couple i did last year, i was on a gfx forum and my name was iQ so thats why the name on those sigs are iQ....

I don't think you realized it yet, but the sharing part of this thread is over.

KillGod wrote: »

I can make a better one.

wait is yo avatar callen from yugioh 5ds?

iTzSmarties wrote: »

This is a couple i did last year, i was on a gfx forum and my name was iQ so thats why the name on those sigs are iQ....

LIES !

no jking nice signatures i have a better house.

KillGod wrote: »

alright... Here it is... umm, btw.. I just got bored.. I am not really good at making sigs... I just like making challenges xD but here is my attempt at a sig >.<

I REFUSE TO READ PAST THE FIRST PAGE WITH 'I CAN DO BETTER' THEN THIS? LAWL. the one in the first post is actually pretty good. there could be more done to it, but he has a good sense of balance, colors, making patterns, giving effects to the texture of the stock itself, and put the stock in flawlessly. most sigs in here look liek random ass presets in teh bg with sum random stock that looks completely out of place for the colors and liek it was just stuck in there with sum1 who just used photoshop for their first time.

FamousFoxx wrote: »

LIES !

no jking nice signatures i have a better house.

nice flow, but it looks like a floating head, which is never a good sign.
also, you should scrap the text
whatever that softbrush > lighten thing on his left shoulder is, you should blend it in more and make the focal to accommodate that lighting from the softbrush.

Dj Flamez wrote: »

to be honest, all it looks like your doing, is rendering a focal, pasting a background, then using layer effects on that render, and adding text with more layer effects.
don't take this the wrong way, but looking over simple tutorials will help a lot.

FamousFoxx wrote: »

My text was always crappy, I watched alot of tutorials but never had a chance to get one for text.

Oh, I had a really killer one that went way beyond my head.
I'll try to find it for you.

edit:
couldn't find it, but here are a couple tutorials.
http://ilovetypography.com/2008/04/04/on-choosing-type/
http://typies.*************/2006/11/15-tips-to-choose-good-text-type.html
http://www.thedesigncubicle.com/2008/12/10-common-typography-mistakes/

But yeah, I'll look for a placement one later.

edit again:
urg, i hate filters.
the ************
is bl/og/sp/ot.c/om

tooGAWDLIKE wrote: »

I REFUSE TO READ PAST THE FIRST PAGE WITH 'I CAN DO BETTER' THEN THIS? LAWL. the one in the first post is actually pretty good. there could be more done to it, but he has a good sense of balance, colors, making patterns, giving effects to the texture of the stock itself, and put the stock in flawlessly. most sigs in here look liek random ass presets in teh bg with sum random stock that looks completely out of place for the colors and liek it was just stuck in there with sum1 who just used photoshop for their first time.

Too bad you didn't read the entire freaking thread moron. Read before you talk ****. Got it?
Btw, Only used photoshop on like two or three other occasions.

ArchSonic wrote: »

Defiantly seen my better days in photoshop...

no... just no... xD

So many pages for just one picture.

ArchSonic wrote: »

Yes?

Yes! I like that one ^^

No you may not unless you pay ZP im his um manager lol

Alright... Just made this for meh friend... What do you people think of it?