Why was a verdict already made?

stMaL

Still can't comprehend why a verdict was made before the player even said their side of the story? I am not picking sides here and am still a neutral party, but in a real case scenario, a verdict should not have been concluded without first hearing the voice of the person being questioned.

[MOD]Polleus

The voice of the person in question was heard in private. There was no need to make any of this public. It just created a big mess that could have been avoided. There is no public tribunal here. The decision rested with the appropriate people at G4Box and everything was done that should have been done. We need to stop addressing the subject. I get that you are trying to have a reasonable conversation, but this will only lead to another thread of flaming and arguing over a subject that's already been given an answer. Closing it up. I apologize if that doesn't make you happy.