Presidential Cup Match Reporting
Comments
-
krawzydawg wrote: »We asked for SD's bandicams.
DJEY
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UbIIzQ-xbfc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NJcdM1v_6WE -
Hmh, I see the bracket updated.. so we are not playing fragbots anymore? Did they say they weren't gonna make it?
Why the F did in theory get the win over us????? Our match is scheduled TODAY. Look back a page or 2 and look at my post, WTF? -
TeamLTD has Rescheduled there game with cautious due to the game lagging.
Thursday 9th at 8 30 est
Thanks
The whole team didn't agree to this decision, it was only one member that wasn't even the leader.
We failed to come to the game due to lack of players online.
If this is a DQ or loss on our side, that's fair, as I am the team leader of Cautious, and did not address this when I first heard of the issue.
I am not even sure if the other team came to play. I didn't bother checking with only 1 other person online on my team that went away from keyboard. -
-
http://forum.z8games.com/showpost.php?p=3553286&postcount=193
Official rosters day before lock: http://forum.z8games.com/showpost.php?p=3555505&postcount=131
Roster change 2 days after lock: http://forum.z8games.com/showpost.php?p=3560354&postcount=143 -
It doesn't matter if an admin confirms it. It is a rule.
You had 1 out of 5 of your players on your roster actually play. It is an entirely different team.
oh well, if that's true then it's true. I didn't even see that. You woulda lost if it weren't for that SS
. Gl in the rest of the tourney -
oh well, if that's true then it's true. I didn't even see that. You woulda lost if it weren't for that SS. Gl in the rest of the tourney
I really wouldn't be so uptight about it, but like I said in the lobby this happens everytime we play. -
It doesn't matter if an admin confirms it. It is a rule.
You had 1 out of 5 of your players on your roster actually play. It is an entirely different team.
It does matter if an admin confirmed it... use your head. A similar instance happened in Wogl were in the rules it read that you can't start a match without 4 players but an Admin confirmed and said we could so they had to go with what the admin said and then cleared it up after.
So GG we win. Better luck next time. -
Guess again .It does matter if an admin confirmed it... use your head. A similar instance happened in Wogl were in the rules it read that you can't start a match without 4 players but an Admin confirmed and said we could so they had to go with what the admin said and then cleared it up after.
So GG we win. Better luck next time. -
It's not like I didnt try to warn the team before the match started.It does matter if an admin confirmed it... use your head. A similar instance happened in Wogl were in the rules it read that you can't start a match without 4 players but an Admin confirmed and said we could so they had to go with what the admin said and then cleared it up after.
So GG we win. Better luck next time.
http://imgur.com/a/mKopZI am an admin.
In theory wins
Thank you. -
To DreamWork and In Theory:
This is entirely my fault. I was unaware of the fact that Chris had even locked the rosters. He has not been here for quite some time due to irl things, and I have been handling the rosters. I have been following the roster rule from the original thread which is stated here:
Because of this rule, I have been accepting all roster changes that were made within 24 hours of that team's scheduled match time. Prime's/DreamWork's roster change was made within 24 hours of their match, therefor they were allowed to play with that roster. Assuming DreamWork did get the win score wise (No one posted anything regarding this, please do so) they will advance.2fastSTREAK wrote: »You can have 5 players with up to 3 subs. Rosters may not be changed within 24 hours of a match.
However, as of right now roster changes will no longer be accepted. -
To DreamWork and In Theory:
This is entirely my fault. I was unaware of the fact that Chris had even locked the rosters. He has not been here for quite some time due to irl things, and I have been handling the rosters. I have been following the roster rule from the original thread which is stated here:
Because of this rule, I have been accepting all roster changes that were made within 24 hours of that team's scheduled match time. Prime's/DreamWork's roster change was made within 24 hours of their match, therefor they were allowed to play with that roster. Assuming DreamWork did get the win score wise (No one posted anything regarding this, please do so) they will advance.
However, as of right now roster changes will no longer be accepted.
The thing is, the post was made in the thread in public that the rosters were locked. Whether you missed it or not it was indeed a rule to be followed and as you stated a mistake on your end. If it would of been 1 player changed it wouldn't be such a problem but 4 out of 5 of the people on their team weren't even on the roster that was supposed to play so it was an entire different team actually playing. You should of known the rule but you missed it. I pointed it out to them before the match started and they failed to follow it. -
I am an admin.
In theory wins
Due to the fact logic and I have not been in communication for a couple weeks, I do think this is fair this way. Since logic gave dreamwork the ok, I can not over rule this. Rosters are offically LOCKED. As of now I revoke my decision of who won, and upon s/s, winner will advance. Sorry.To DreamWork and In Theory:
This is entirely my fault. I was unaware of the fact that Chris had even locked the rosters. He has not been here for quite some time due to irl things, and I have been handling the rosters. I have been following the roster rule from the original thread which is stated here:
Because of this rule, I have been accepting all roster changes that were made within 24 hours of that team's scheduled match time. Prime's/DreamWork's roster change was made within 24 hours of their match, therefor they were allowed to play with that roster. Assuming DreamWork did get the win score wise (No one posted anything regarding this, please do so) they will advance.
However, as of right now roster changes will no longer be accepted. -
Do you have proof of you saying this to them? (s/s)The thing is, the post was made in the thread in public that the rosters were locked. Whether you missed it or not it was indeed a rule to be followed and as you stated a mistake on your end. If it would of been 1 player changed it wouldn't be such a problem but 4 out of 5 of the people on their team weren't even on the roster that was supposed to play so it was an entire different team actually playing. You should of known the rule but you missed it. I pointed it out to them before the match started and they failed to follow it.
![[Lethal]](https://wc.vanillicon.com/v2/cb431d80eb4b5dd3df53384f2aeaad77.svg)
Categories
- All Categories
- Z8Games
- 1 Z8 Forum Discussion & Suggestions
- 15 Z8Games Announcements
- Rules & Conduct
- 2.5K CrossFire
- 715 CrossFire Announcements
- 714 Previous Announcements
- 2 Previous Patch Notes
- 323 Community
- 12 Modes
- 393 Suggestions
- 16 Clan Discussion and Recruitment
- 73 CF Competitive Forum
- 1 CFCL
- 16 Looking for a Team?
- 524 CrossFire Support
- 7 Suggestion
- 15 CrossFire Guides
- 37 CrossFire Off Topic